3.18 submit
3.19 with editor
6.3 dip
6.5 reject

(1) 讚！ | kk5678

2023/06/03, submitted;
2023/09/16, Major Revision1;
2023/12/11, Major Revision2;
2024/02/19, Minor Revision;
2024/05/22, Accept.

Average review time is 3 months. CAGEO is quite friendly to freshmen in research, as long as the writing is acceptable, they usually give major revisions. This was my first paper submitted to CAGEO. The only drawback is the long review period, it took nearly a year from submission to acceptance, and one of the reviewers for MR2 dropped out midway. Overall, CAGEO is good, after all, it is a SCI Q2 journal

(0) 讚！ | Voruarn0362

Can co-authors of a manuscript see the review status code?

(0) 讚！ | v发货吧v

The review process is really slow, I suggest future submitters to consider carefully. Submitted on 3.18, with editor on 3.19 and still with editor. I've already contacted the editor to speed up the process

(1) 讚！ | kk5678

Submitted on 1/14, rejected by editor on 1/16, very fast. The direction proposed was completely in line but lacked innovation, and a review article was provided as reference. The journal is of very high standard, and the 5500-word limit was indeed difficult to meet. Spent a long time reducing the word count before submitting

(0) 讚！ | 一蓑

Submitted on 22.10.16 and returned after major revisions on 23.1.4. One of the suggestions was rejected, but the other feedback was quite helpful, including issues with the code. It was confirmed that the C/C++ code I submitted was affected by system environment problems. I was given two months to make revisions, and the code must be made public. Otherwise, it will be rejected. However, it seems that there are certain categories of articles that do not require code submission. Overall, it feels a bit slow. This is my first submission and first experience with this kind of feedback. Let's see how it goes

(3) 讚！ | draw123draw

6.8, submit first draft

(0) 讚！ | mapman

10.9, major revision, with a two-month revision deadline. Three experts reviewed the manuscript, two gave positive feedback, and one directly suggested rejection. 11.26, submitted revised manuscript

(1) 讚！ | mapman

May I ask if co-authors of this journal can view the status of the manuscript review?

(0) 讚！ | 羊咩咩

Do you want to make your source code public?

(0) 讚！ | 无昵称用户

Is there any follow-up from the original poster?

(0) 讚！ | nanshou

Submitted on June 8, 2023. Still under review. Very slow, please be careful when submitting

(1) 讚！ | mapman

9.16, Decision in process,
9.17, Major Revision before Nov 15, 2023

(0) 讚！ | Voruarn0362

2021.04.13 submit to journal
2021.04.19 With Editor
2021.05.10 Under Review
2021.05.28 Under Review
2021.08.02 Required Reviews Completed
2021.08.08 Decision in Process
2021.08.24 Major Revision until 2021.10.22
2021.09.21 Resubmit
2021.10.04 With Editor
2021.10.05 Under Review
2021.10.18 Under Review
2021.11.27 Required Reviews Completed
2021.11.28 Decision in Process
2021.11.30 Minor Revision
2021.12.03 Resubmit
2021.12.04 With Editor
2021.12.08 Accept

(10) 讚！ | DDSSD

Update, August 3rd, Under Review.

(0) 讚！ | Voruarn0362

I just submitted, is it taking this long?

(0) 讚！ | zzr

May 24th, first submission.
May 30th, rejected, reason for rejection: iThenticate similarity score higher than 10%, does not meet requirements.

June 3rd, revised and resubmitted as "submitted to journal".
June 13th, "with editor".
Currently, July 14th, still "with editor", sent email to request an update.

(0) 讚！ | Voruarn0362

Does anyone have already submitted or prepared to submit CG?

(0) 讚！ | Hakertop

Received at Editorial Office
30 Mar 2021
Article revised
2 Oct 2021
Article accepted for publication
25 Oct 2021

In between, the first major revision was submitted in June.
Experiments were conducted in July.
Revised in August.
Minor revisions were requested in September (around 28th), and the revised version was returned within a week (by 2nd October). Acceptance took approximately twenty days.
The official website's processing speed is not accurate. I noticed that the duration for the latest papers is around five to six months.

(1) 讚！ | llcc

Is there any follow-up from the original poster?

(0) 讚！ | Ceciliaanne

First instance: Nearly 4 months
Second instance: 2 months
Third instance: Over 20 days

(0) 讚！ | 一颗青柠

Submitted the paper on July 2, 2020.
A month later, it had not been reviewed, so I followed up.
Submitted for review on September 9, 2020.
Followed up twice in between.
Received feedback around January 15, 2021.
Sent the revised article back on February 6, 2021.
A month later, it is still not under review, so I followed up.
The editor sent the revised article for review on March 15, 2021.
It is now April 19th, and it is still under review. It seems like I won't be able to graduate on time. The review process is taking too long. Everyone, be cautious when submitting.

(0) 讚！ | libra9610

Since changing the editor-in-chief, the speed of reviewing has become much slower.

(7) 讚！ | cugGIS

2020.07.02 Paper submitted; 2020.09.09 sent for review. It is currently waiting for the first review results.

(1) 讚！ | libra9610

The review speed is fast, the review comments are pertinent, the two revisions are accepted, the publication speed is fast, the editor is very responsible

(0) 讚！ | jji