In the first review, there were two reviewers. One of them raised 20 questions, which were quite sharp; the other raised 10 questions. The questions raised by the reviewers were all constructive and meaningful. The submission experience was good.

(0) 讚！ | killer

2023.02.20  Submission
2023.03.08  Review
2023.04.06  Major revision
2023.04.26  Revised
2023.05.30  Minor revision
2023.05.31  Revised
2023.06.16  Accepted

(0) 讚！ | killer

22.9 Submission, handled by the editor
23.3 Returned with first review comments, two reviewers
23.4 Re-submission
23.6 Accepted
It's a bit slow, maybe because the method is a bit niche and I'm a beginner, but the fast second review is a pleasant surprise.

(0) 讚！ | 某某学科爱好者修炼手札

7.13 submit - Submitted on July 13th
7.15 with editor - With the editor on July 15th
10.28 一审结束，大修 - First review completed, major revisions required on October 28th
11.15 修回 - Revised on November 15th
12.22 接收 - Accepted on December 22nd
挺好的计流的期刊，虽然比不上第一梯队的，国外比较认可。可惜整个流体在中科院的分区都不高，忧伤 - It's a pretty good journal for fluid mechanics, although it doesn't compare to the top-tier ones, it is well-regarded internationally. Unfortunately, the overall ranking of fluid mechanics in the Chinese Academy of Sciences is not high, which is regretful and sad.

(5) 讚！ | Komi

2021-5.22 Submission
2021.5.29 Under review
2021.7.22 Major revision
2021.9.25 Notice of acceptance
2021.10.15 Online publication

(0) 讚！ | leeroket

The speed is relatively fast.

(0) 讚！ | leeroket

Submitted, will be reviewed in a week, outcome unknown, likely to be rejected.

(1) 讚！ | xqb

Do you know in which zone this journal is recognized in universities?

(0) 讚！ | mei6

20.12.21 Submission
Completed required reviews on a day in March
20.4.8 Received two review comments, made modifications
20.4.25 Uploaded revised manuscript
5.6 Second review started
5.27 Completed required reviews
5.30 Decision in progress, returned to editor for further processing
6.2 Accepted

(0) 讚！ | Fluid-LBM

4 months to the first trial results, changed for one month, received after the select, a total of about 7.8 months, feeling slightly slower.

(1) 讚！ | 把球给我，我要回家了~

The next day after submitting the manuscript, the text of the article needs to be modified. After the modification, the select will be made. The next day, with the editor, then one and a half months or with the editor, just wrote the email.Feel the journal is slow.

(0) 讚！ | hhp

From submission to acceptance for a total of eight months.The review was slightly slower, four months of first-instance opinion, two reviewers, one overhauled a minor repair, and repaired for two months, and then accepted it two months later.Fluid mechanics, a second-rate journal of computational fluid dynamics, has a large gap relative to jfm and jcp.

(0) 讚！ | zqxu@mail.ustc.edu.cn

The review time is quite satisfactory, not at all.Immediately after the accept, I hang on the Internet.

(0) 讚！ | Anonymous

Submitted in June last year, only responded in September this year. Fortunately, I replied to Xiao Xiu. During the period, I reminded me that the review reply did not arrive. I thought it was the rhythm of rejection.It was published last week, and this is really fast.

(1) 讚！ | 匿名

Entering the review within one week, the review process is also very fast!I received a reply in about 2 months, but I was rejected!The length of review time varies, and the short review time of my article may be related to the direction.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

Nothing good or bad to say about this journal. The review period is standard (~3 months) and the online submission system updates the status of your paper frequently.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

for two months, has been "With Editor",I will not return to the mail.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

7月11号under review, it has been under review until December 10th, it has been 5 months.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

IF 1.433(2011)

(1) 讚！ | 匿名

Journal Homepage URL: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find ... ome/365/description

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

I submitted the manuscript on July 2nd. After the technical review, I will return it on July 10th for technical modification. Because it is a small problem (the table does not use the three-line table), the day is changed, the submitment is made, 7On the 11th, under review, now August 16th, has been under review.The follow-up situation will continue to follow.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名