Submitted-13 march
WE-13th march
WE date changed- 14th March
Under review-17 march
Major revision-01 april
Accepted-14 april

(0) 讚！ | Composite

I have been waiting for 2 weeks, and none of the 5 reviewers have accepted it.

(0) 讚！ | 反派

Submitted: 2025.01.20
With editor: 2022.01.20
Under review: 2025.01.22
Major revision: 2025.03.10
Revised submission: 2025.03.29
Accept: 2025.03.29

The efficiency is very fast, thanks to Editor Uday Vaidya!

(0) 讚！ | Primary scholar：Mr.G

20250311 submit
20250311 with editor
20250315 under review
I have sent out four invitations ten days ago, but none have been accepted.

(0) 讚！ | GAIJIN

May I ask when will we have the results?

(0) 讚！ | AMNMMH

2025.03.19 submitted
03.20 decision in process
03.22 reject
The editorial department said that the acceptance rate is currently less than 10%.

(0) 讚！ | Southern penguin

2025.3.9 with editor
2025.3.16 under review (8 reviewers)

(0) 讚！ | YH@0103

Boss, boss, I would like to ask how long it took from submission to review, and then how long it took to receive feedback.

(0) 讚！ | 肖en-d

12 were sent, 8 were accepted, it has been a week since RRC, gradually 5 people have returned their opinions. Does this journal require all reviewers to return their opinions before making a decision?

(0) 讚！ | 流水岩碎拳

The submission timeline is as follows: the first round of results was returned by Editor-in-Chief Wang Hao, but by the second round, he had already left, resulting in a much slower processing speed. The article was submitted after being rejected by Angew and AFM.
24.10.15 submit
10.15/16 with editor
10.24 under review
11.11 three reviews completed
11.22 fourth reviewer added
11.27 required reviews completed
12.1 decision in process
12.4 major revision
Four reviewers raised about 20 questions, requiring additional experiments. The reviewers' comments were longer than the main text.
12.28 revision with editor
25.1.21 with editor
1.27 under review with 2 reviewers
2.16 under review with additional 2 reviewers
2.22 required reviews completed
2.23 decision in process
3.8 accepted.

(1) 讚！ | zaneparker

Directly inviting 12 people to submit contributions, within less than two days, 8 people have already agreed. It's too overwhelming.

(0) 讚！ | wrxwrx

Do all authors need to click on the confirmation link after submitting the manuscript?

(0) 讚！ | zhoushangyan

It won't have any impact, my situation is the same as yours, received it yesterday, handled by editor Uday.

(0) 讚！ | zhongzhong是只小猫

Please translate the following paragraph into English: 

"Looking at the journal homepage, Wang Hao is no longer serving as the editor-in-chief. The article revisions were handled by Editor Wang. The status now is 'decision in process.' Will this have any impact on the handling of the manuscript? Should we send an email to inquire about it?"

(0) 讚！ | LET IT BEE

Is there any follow-up? How long have you been waiting?

(0) 讚！ | lilian4139

May I ask what happened next?

(0) 讚！ | lilian4139

Excuse me, is JMST fast? Is there a timeline that I can refer to?

(0) 讚！ | lilian4139

Is there any follow-up?

(0) 讚！ | lilian4139

Is it useful to send a follow-up email? I've been waiting for over half a month with the editor, and I'm debating whether or not to send one.

(0) 讚！ | 不愿意透露姓名的草根科研者

So slow, terrible editing efficiency. The arrogance of the journal is much higher than the quality of the journal, ciao.

(0) 讚！ | Hanker

This journal is too trashy, biased against Chinese submissions, pure torture, and I will never submit to it again in the future.

(0) 讚！ | kakarot

I submitted my manuscript in early July and it has been five and a half months since then, but it is still under the first round of review. Despite my efforts to push for a response, there has been no progress. I am speechless and hesitant to submit to this journal again.

(0) 讚！ | AMNMMH

We can directly submit the article and start looking for the next journal in advance.

(0) 讚！ | 超级马力

Editor 4 asked for minor revisions, to update the references, but now they are not responding...

(0) 讚！ | hzxdb

Can it go directly from "with editor" to "decide in process," or is it necessary to go from "with editor" to "under review" first?

(0) 讚！ | SCARECROW1