期刊簡介 | |||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
期刊名稱![]() | COMPOSITE STRUCTURES LetPub Score 8.2
64 ratings
Rate
Reputation 8.3 Influence 8.0 Speed 6.5 | ||||||||||||||||||||
期刊簡稱 | COMPOS STRUCT | ||||||||||||||||||||
ISSN | 0263-8223 | ||||||||||||||||||||
h-index | 130 | ||||||||||||||||||||
CiteScore |
| ||||||||||||||||||||
自引率 (2023-2024) | 9.50%自引率趨勢 | ||||||||||||||||||||
掲載範囲 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||
官方網站 | https://www.journals.elsevier.com/composite-structures | ||||||||||||||||||||
在線稿件提交 | https://www.editorialmanager.com/COMSTR | ||||||||||||||||||||
開放訪問 | No | ||||||||||||||||||||
出版商 | Elsevier BV | ||||||||||||||||||||
主題領域 | 工程技术 | ||||||||||||||||||||
出版國/地區 | ENGLAND | ||||||||||||||||||||
發行頻率 | 月2回刊行 | ||||||||||||||||||||
創刊年 | 1983 | ||||||||||||||||||||
每年文章數 | 999每年文章數趨勢 | ||||||||||||||||||||
黃金OA百分比 | 8.91% | ||||||||||||||||||||
Web of Science 四分位 ( 2023-2024) | WOS Quartile: Q1
| ||||||||||||||||||||
索引 (SCI or SCIE) | Science Citation Index Expanded | ||||||||||||||||||||
鏈接到PubMed Central (PMC) | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=0263-8223%5BISSN%5D | ||||||||||||||||||||
平均審稿時間 * | 來自出版商的數據: 來自作者的數據: About 3.0 month(s) 來自Elsevier的數據: Average 7.9 Week(s) | ||||||||||||||||||||
競爭力 * | 來自作者的數據: Moderate 來自Elsevier的數據: 48% | ||||||||||||||||||||
在線文章發布時間 | 來自Elsevier的數據: Average 5.1 Week(s) | ||||||||||||||||||||
參考鏈接 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||
*所有的審稿過程指標,如接受率和審稿速度,僅限於用戶提交的稿件。因此,這些指標可能無法準確反映期刊的競爭力或速度。 |
|
首頁 上一頁 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 下一頁 末頁 (頁 | |
[COMPOSITE STRUCTURES] 的評論 | 撰寫評論 |
作者: momo_n+1 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 4.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2025-04-14 11:21:43 評論於 The submission was assigned to Nicholas Fantuzzi for editing. Despite encountering Christmas, it took 2 months for the initial submission to be reviewed. However, the subsequent revised version and DIP were processed quite quickly. 11th December: Submission 23rd January: Review (invited 5 reviewers) 19th February: Minor revisions after first review (4 reviewers, felt like major revisions, wrote a 40-page response) 3rd March: Submitted R1 version 28th March: Minor revisions after second review (3 reviewers had no comments, one reviewer provided 7 comments) 1st April: Submitted R2 version (editor only invited one reviewer, likely the one who provided comments) 6th April: Reviewer completed their review 13th April: Decision in Principle (DIP) 14th April: Acceptance ![]() ![]() |
作者: what can I say 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 6.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2025-03-28 09:46:09 評論於 Typically, 2-6 reviewers are needed. If the editor invites N people and n agree to review, but some of them forget to review, resulting in only m reviews returned, then there are m reviewers (N>n>m). ![]() ![]() |
作者: 科研小渣渣 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-03-27 20:23:18 評論於 How many reviewers' opinions are generally needed? ![]() ![]() |
作者: Nuyoah- 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-03-27 20:08:15 評論於 It's not me, but I feel that we have been very bored for such a long time. ![]() ![]() |
作者: what can I say 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 6.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2025-03-26 09:25:33 評論於 In the second article, which is edited by Nicholas from Italy, the average time from submission to acceptance is close to 6 months. Here is the timeline for the second article: October - with editor, stayed in editor's hands for two months before being sent for review December - under review January - decision in process, delayed for half a month February - revision February - submitted February - under review Early March - required review complete Late March - decision in process, delayed for half a month End of March - Acceptance ![]() ![]() |
作者: 笑笑 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 4.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2025-03-03 20:59:07 評論於 Feb 18, submit revision Feb 28, accept The first round of review is really slow, but it gets faster later on. ![]() ![]() |
作者: ctfnm 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-02-28 20:06:32 評論於 Why was it rejected? Does it not fit the scope of the journal? It's okay, brother, I believe your next submission will be successful. ![]() ![]() |
作者: 大大大大菜狗 領域: 材料科学 審稿時間: 2.0 month(s) 結果: 拒稿 撰寫評論 |
2025-02-28 19:48:37 評論於 Received a rejection letter today after 41 days of waiting. ![]() ![]() |
作者: ctfnm 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-02-26 10:58:19 評論於 Like you, the missing editor has been gone for over thirty days. ![]() ![]() |
作者: 大大大大菜狗 領域: 材料科学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-02-25 11:15:08 評論於 Jan 18, 2025 Submit Jan 23, 2025 With Editor As of now, the status remains unchanged. ![]() ![]() |
作者: 科研小菜鸡0_+ 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 1.0 month(s) 結果: 拒稿 撰寫評論 |
2025-02-12 16:50:46 評論於 0203 was directly rejected, the direction was not in line. ![]() ![]() |
作者: wxsoong 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 3.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-02-06 16:00:52 評論於 Will two reviewers from RRC result in rejection? ![]() ![]() |
作者: 机械师1988 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-01-24 19:25:42 評論於 Submitted on January 3, 2025, ongoing WE Updated on January 23, 2025, continuing WE ![]() ![]() |
作者: glaa 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-01-22 17:12:36 評論於 Is it over already? ![]() ![]() |
作者: 笑笑 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-01-21 18:47:14 評論於 It's over, major overhaul. ![]() ![]() |
作者: glaa 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-01-16 19:23:21 評論於 Is it not over yet? ![]() ![]() |
作者: mensheng 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 7.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2025-01-15 16:54:11 評論於 2024.6 Submission 2024.11 Major revision 2025.1 Acceptance ![]() ![]() |
作者: glaa 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-01-14 20:18:09 評論於 My return has been processed, and 0107dip is still pending. ![]() ![]() |
作者: 笑笑 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-01-13 15:44:33 評論於 Are you still in dip? I saw you rrc-ed a long time ago. ![]() ![]() |
作者: 笑笑 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-01-13 15:42:56 評論於 I'm sorry, could you please provide the text you would like me to translate into English? ![]() ![]() |
作者: glaa 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-01-13 13:56:18 評論於 Has the dip ended? ![]() ![]() |
作者: 笑笑 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-01-09 10:11:50 評論於 It has been a week already... ![]() ![]() |
作者: glaa 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-01-08 09:15:47 評論於 How long does dip last? ![]() ![]() |
作者: keithiscxc 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 4.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2025-01-07 17:07:07 評論於 Received at Editorial Office 18 Aug 2024 Article revised 26 Dec 2024 Article accepted for publication 6 Jan 2025 Nine reviewers were contacted, five accepted the invitation, and four provided valid feedback. One reviewer clearly did not read the article and provided irrelevant comments. I requested an extension of one month for revisions. Upon resubmission, I noticed that only four reviewers were invited by the editor, presumably the ones who provided valid feedback. However, there is a question regarding another article I submitted during the revision period. This second article is in a completely different field (the first article focused on structural vibrations, while the new submission is on energy-absorbing materials) and has been in the "with editor" status for over a month. As of now, the first article is either accepted or still "with editor." Is it not possible for the journal to handle both of my articles simultaneously? ![]() ![]() |
作者: 笑笑 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-01-03 16:54:15 評論於 January 2, 2025, Decision in Process. ![]() ![]() |
首頁 上一頁 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 下一頁 末頁 (頁 |
Contact us