The submission process is long, the editor-in-chief is irresponsible. I submitted my paper in December 2023 and it was not sent back for revisions until May 2024. Both reviewers suggested minor revisions, but after resubmitting, I was informed in August that my paper was rejected. I could see from the submission platform that the external reviewers agreed with the revisions and recommended publication. However, the reason for rejection was that the editor-in-chief felt the paper did not align with the journal's direction. I don't understand why it was accepted during the initial review. Furthermore, I received the recommendation for publication from the external reviewers in May, but was only informed in August. It's really frustrating.

(1) 讚！ | 吴

Isn't that a rejection? Why not explain the reason?

(0) 讚！ | 副叫兽

A few days after submitting my manuscript, they replied to my email saying that my paper title is very similar to the title of a paper in a link they provided, and asked me to explain. I checked the link they sent, and there was no paper similar to mine. Have any of you experienced this before? I have already resubmitted to a different journal

(0) 讚！ | 爱编程的小小曾

Just a note, as of 11.28, editing and the system are still in the PA phase, with the main focus on the offline status~

(0) 讚！ | 孤军奋战的人

Brothers, you can add me, and notify me of any news

(0) 讚！ | ikun111

The warning from the Chinese Academy of Sciences is a joke. The SCI database is not under its control. For example, some journals are not warned by the Chinese Academy of Sciences, but are kicked out by the SCI database; while some journals are warned by the Chinese Academy of Sciences, but the SCI database does not remove them. Those who understand, understand. So this warning is a bit of a joke, haha

(0) 讚！ | ikun111

Just invested, jotting it down

(0) 讚！ | ikun111

Pending approval has been since August 2nd. I do not have the contact information of the editor. How can I obtain it?

(0) 讚！ | 孤军奋战的人

The submission system allows you to check the status of your manuscript. If it is "with editor" or "under review," you can directly email the editor for an update

(0) 讚！ | 副叫兽

Submitted on June 6, 2023; revised according to the first review on August 2, 2023. After that, there was no news. Four reminder letters were sent during this period, but there was no response

(0) 讚！ | 孤军奋战的人

May I ask what the current status is now? Has the speed of this journal slowed down now?

(0) 讚！ | 孤军奋战的人

How are things going now? Any progress?

(0) 讚！ | jlj931126

How fast are you going?

(0) 讚！ | jlj931126

Does anyone know the review speed of this journal?

(0) 讚！ | 奈良云彻

No matter how much the Chinese Academy of Sciences warns, they cannot control whether someone is indexed in SCI.

(0) 讚！ | 就完事了水

The quality of this journal is still good. It is a bit unfair to be included in the warning list.

(0) 讚！ | DAZHE

In reality, basically, those teachers from ordinary undergraduate universities or junior colleges in humanities, social sciences, and physical education who independently conduct research and make improvements in the field of artificial intelligence, are almost always accurate when checked.

(0) 讚！ | klasnic

2022.3.1   Submit manuscript
2022.3.2   Assign academic editor, invite reviewers
2022.3.4   External review
2022.5.8   Editorial decision
2022.5.14 Major revisions
2022.6.29 Upload revised manuscript
2022.6.30 External review
2022.7.8   Editorial decision
2022.7.10 Acceptance
2022.7.12 Quality check
2022.7.13 Handover to publication
The reviewers' comments were very professional and strict, and the editing process was very fast. The speed of acceptance depends on the speed of the reviewers' review and also luck. The time from submission to publication in this journal is at least 4-6 months.
For Hindawi Publishing, if you see acceptance within a month, it can be basically confirmed that it was submitted through special channels. Have you not noticed that many special issues have a bunch of articles in fields like art, philosophy, language, and sports, which use various machine learning or artificial intelligence algorithms? They are all bought by the authors through channels. Complexity is not as serious in this aspect. Finally, if Chinese journals can be made open access on CNKI, the publication quantity will greatly increase, and I believe no one would be willing to spend money to submit to SCI.

(3) 讚！ | 伪装

Will this journal be kicked out by WOS? Why can't I retrieve data from after 2016?

(0) 讚！ | 伪装

Master, I am just waiting for it to quickly hire after graduation. However, I found that some reviewers are fast, taking less than a month. And some reviewers are slow, taking a year to provide feedback.

(0) 讚！ | 伪装

This journal is not very fast. The review comments are still good, and being warned is indeed unjust. The review comments are still very professional. It is helpful for improving the paper. Maybe there are too many Chinese people who get published. Are you pursuing a master's or a doctorate?

(0) 讚！ | lczhlydn

There is no necessary connection between warnings and submissions. If the school acknowledges it, you can still submit. This journal doesn't necessarily have a fast response.

(0) 讚！ | C& AGW

We graduate without looking at warnings or alerts. Originally thought it would be quick, now regret investing. Not only are there warnings, but the review process is also super slow. The cost-effectiveness is too low.

(0) 讚！ | 伪装

The moderate warning has been issued, why are you still investing?

(0) 讚！ | lczhlydn

Why is the review process of this journal so slow? It has been over a month and it is still under review. The submission experience is terrible. The papers downstairs get accepted in just two weeks, which seems fake. Experts, how long does it usually take to receive external review comments?

(0) 讚！ | 伪装