The  is very poor. However, the issues addressed in the work happened to be the same as those raised by the editor, and they were resolved thoroughly.

The work was too biased and went through two years of peer review. It was hard work for the reviewers, but it feels like they didn't review it carefully and didn't raise any issues.

Another paper is about to be submitted and is likely to be accepted, addressing another issue.

A few years ago, there were many publications from Chinese authors, but recently there have been noticeably fewer. There used to be many articles on PDEs, but now the articles are more closely related to physics. Mathematical problems arising purely from physics are much more likely to be accepted. The preferences have become more standardized

(0) 讚！ | abcbb

23.5.5 Editor invited, preparing to withdraw the submission, a garbage journal, blacklisted.

(0) 讚！ | leeroket

2023.3.26 Submission
2023.3.28 Editor invited
2023.4.23 Editor invited
Too slow, please be cautious.

(0) 讚！ | leeroket

In the direction of power system, the quality of articles in this journal is a little higher than that of Advances in Mathematics. Among the journals one level lower than Journal of the European Mathematical Society, Annales Scientifiques de l'École Normale Supérieure, Geometric and Functional Analysis, etc., there is only Communications in Mathematical Physics.

(19) 讚！ | 南大陈冠希

I feel that this journal does not allow mathematical methods that are physically challenging.In other words, don't question well-established results; respecting academic authority is more important than respecting scientific truth.What is said is that if you offend academic authority, what good is it for yourself?Respect the authority, go to the middle of the two ends, peace and security, what is wrong?

(0) 讚！ | rtm6898

"As long as there are innovative articles, there must be suitable journals!" ---- That is to encourage people, this is not the case, depending on the degree of innovation, kinship, and luck..Thomas Young, in the famous Young's double-slit experiment in 1801, discovered the interference properties of light.A paper was written for this purpose, but the paper was published in nowhere, and it was printed as a booklet. It is said that only one book was printed after the release.

(1) 讚！ | trxtrxtrx

I used a previous article to select for CIMP, 7 days was rejected, and later changed to a journal for 4 months, CIMP is indeed the best journal in mathematics and physics!As long as there are innovative articles, there must be a suitable journal!To downstairs

(0) 讚！ | CIMP

俺The manuscript is submitted to PRD, and the manuscript is directly rejected in 5 days; the JPA is returned to the JPA, and the manuscript is directly rejected in 9 days; the CIMP is re-submitted, and the manuscript is directly rejected in 38 days;37 days directly rejected; now IJTP, ...

(0) 讚！ | rtgedm

CIMP refuses to engage in extremely fast speed, the basic inappropriate one week will refuse to review.Nowadays, many parts of this journal are PDE or purely mathematical physics, and there are few other articles.

(0) 讚！ | Xi-Nan Ma

Editor assigned 40 days later, the editor will directly reject the draft (noSend an external trial).It is much faster than the 4 months downstairs.

(0) 讚！ | MGD

Immediately rejected without external review. After 4 months I wrote to theEditorial Office and they immediately reply that You paper is still under review, but I will contact the editor in case there is need of reminders.Https://scirev.sc/reviews/communications-in-mathematical-physics/

(0) 讚！ | cimp12345

How long does it take for the journal to be assigned to the review process?

(0) 讚！ | Anonymous

To Downstairs "Masiin": It seems that it is impossible to judge whether or not "one manuscript is more than one select", whether it is "violation of academic ethics".People say, "Even if you receive the email of the manuscript, you don't give "," and there is no rejection letter, indicating that the journal is not accepted; it should be able to select for other journals, not counting multiple submissions.Besides, the journal's editor's handling of manuscripts is very disrespectful to the author and is not worth promoting.On the other hand, how do you know the article? "The problem solved is very similar to the folk science"?I can see without seeing it?

(0) 讚！ | CMP

You do violate academic ethics, and do not say how your article is doing, seeing what you mean isThe manuscript has been submitted, CIMP has not rejected you, your article has been accepted by other journals, and the problem you see is very similar to the folk science.

(1) 讚！ | 麻希南

Communications in Mathematical Physics This journal is a reputable journal in the field of mathematical physics, as Stephen Hawking has published a very famous paper on it.I don't know how to select once and for all, and I don't even give the email of the manuscript. Of course, there is no rejection letter.The purpose of the manuscript is to try to solve one of the most controversial problems in classical physics. I don't know if there is no innovation or over-innovation, or to offend too many people, violating the rules of the academic world, making the editor so disgusted.But there is no way to go, but it was published in another SCI journal.For more than a year, I haven't received a comment from others, although I have pointed out obvious errors in ten author papers and classic textbooks.I have been waiting for it, people are ignoring, high hanging free of war cards, really boring.

(0) 讚！ | runningwater

Such a good journal is listed as a university physics by the Chinese Academy of Sciences, and it is still a three district.I really don't understand!If placed in a math class, it must be a district!

(0) 讚！ | Anonymous

If the impact factor can be 3, it would be fine.

(0) 讚！ | Anonymous