4.9 sub
4.11 under review   Invitation 2
4.15  Accept review 1   Complete review 1
6.10  Accept review 1   Complete review 1  send email to urge submission
6.17  Accept review 1   Complete review 1
Why not continue to invite since the reviewer has not agreed to review for two months?
Waiting is meaningless. There has been no progress in urging submission

(0) 讚！ | 牛乳局局长

3.29 Submission
4.15 Major Revision
6.3 Major Revision Resubmission (requested extension for 1 month)
6.6 Minor Revision
6.8 Minor Revision Resubmission
6.10 Acceptance
Thank you to editor Katsuhiko Ariga, very nice, response very fast

(2) 讚！ | 加油

My situation is similar to yours, we are probably assigned to the same editor. This editor works too slowly, it's really frustrating

(0) 讚！ | ioioioioio

Have you sent a reminder? It's almost been half a year, and I reminded once in the middle. The editor added another reviewer, but it's been almost two months again and the reviewer hasn't even started reviewing. It's such a waste of time

(1) 讚！ | 不知先生

Submitted on April 26, 2024
With editor on April 28, 2024
A reminder was sent on May 28, 2024, but still no response from the editor (selected 'with editor' when submitting). The status of the article remains 'with editor' as of April 28, 2024. I have no energy to complain anymore. This is really taking advantage of others. I will definitely not submit to this journal next time

(0) 讚！ | kb24

Brother, did you make any major or minor revisions? Did the second review decide without sending it to the editor?

(0) 讚！ | 十年111

2024.01.03 Submission;
2024.01.08 Assigned to Editor Shuo Bai, very nice;
2024.01.22 External review returned;
2024.02.11 Revised;
2024.02.11 Accepted.
Quality control is good, there is room for improvement, and the factors will increase

(0) 讚！ | 月创醉天

6.3, still with editor

(0) 讚！ | searchpaper

Submitted from ASS, on 3.29 received first round of comments on 4.22, with 1 rejection and 3 revisions. The revisions provided by the editor, two reviewers raised similar questions. Returned for revision on 5.10, resubmitted on 5.23 (R2). One reviewer suggested further improvement in the quality of the article. Resubmitted on 5.27 and accepted on 5.31. The whole process took two months from submission to acceptance. Special thanks to Professor Bai Shuo for selecting this manuscript

(0) 讚！ | hxzhicheng

It has been under review for nearly five months, unbelievably slow

(0) 讚！ | ioioioioio

Have you sent for external audit? What are the specific reasons?

(0) 讚！ | lark1532

Submitted on May 13; with editor on May 14
Now it's May 30; still with editor

This journal is so slow! Think twice before submitting

(0) 讚！ | searchpaper

The selected edit is not correct, right?

(0) 讚！ | zhoumu

I have also been submitting for a long time, and now it's taking longer for the editors to review before witheditor. Why is it so slow recently?

(0) 讚！ | 努力的小小少年

It's okay, I completed three reviews in one week, and I will have the revisions ready by the 19th

(0) 讚！ | 十年111

Please translate the following paragraph into English and Japanese, and title them as ":" and "

(0) 讚！ | xiao tang

Please translate the following paragraph into English and Japanese

(0) 讚！ | xiao tang

20240428 submit
20240430 with editor
20240517 with editor
It's been over half a month and it's still with the editor, the review process is indeed very slow

(0) 讚！ | 独家记忆

Can I use antibiotics to remove white spot algae?

(0) 讚！ | xiao tang

Not yet invested

(0) 讚！ | xiao tang

Weixin AISWEI official account

(0) 讚！ | dqwfqf

I am as confused as you are

(0) 讚！ | dqwfqf

It's been over four months now, and there is only one reviewer who has completed the review. I feel frustrated. I chose that editor at that time, and it turns out it was not a good choice as I heard people say

(0) 讚！ | 小花花a

Record the submission

(0) 讚！ | jjzlw

What's going on with this journal? It's been five months since submission and it's still under review

(0) 讚！ | iiiiiiii