How long does it usually take to receive the final review comments after submission?

(0) 讚！ | 那年听风

When will the feedback from the first review come back?

(0) 讚！ | 那年听风

When did you finally come back with your opinion?

(0) 讚！ | 那年听风

The second article in the series. Multiple techniques were employed to determine the sequence, site amino acids, and configuration of polytropicin. It was submitted on May 31, 2021, and a reminder was sent during the review process. On August 17, major revisions were requested, with significant changes to the text and detailed explanations provided. The revised version was resubmitted on August 20 and accepted on September 7. The reviewers and editors were very diligent and recommended it!

(0) 讚！ | 张

The provided text "2021.7.26 accept" is already in English and does not require translation. It simply indicates accepting something on July 26th, 2021.

(0) 讚！ | 超钰

"Returning to Second Repair on July 9th, 2021. With editor - Is it normal to be in this state all the time now?"

(0) 讚！ | 超钰

Submitted at the end of November 2019, a minor revision was required in one and a half months, and then it got accepted after revisions were made. It was officially accepted in April 2020. The paper is about chromatographic mass spectrometry analysis. Editors and reviewers are very responsible. Take your paper seriously and you will get a good result.

(0) 讚！ | 张

Received: 3 June 2020; Revised: 8 August 2020; Accepted: 1 September 2020; Online: 14 September 2020. Two months after submission, comments on minor revision were raised. Three weeks after the submission of the revised manuscript, the notice of acceptance was received. One weeks later, it was proofread. The whole process took about three months and it was relatively smooth, and the overall feeling was not difficult.

(0) 讚！ | lxxxx12

It took about 4 months before and after. It was submitted before February. Under review before March 6; March 11 required reviews completed; March 14 with editor; March 24 major revision; April 21 revision submitted to journal; April 24 with editor; April 25 under review; May 9 with editor; May 13 decision in process; May 14 accept. It was generally very fast. During the period of major revision, I delayed my reply for a month, and I also corrected the author. The editor was serious and two experts’ opinions were given.

(3) 讚！ | bxz

Magazine editing is very good, after the draft is actively processed, the external audit time is a bit long.Requires rigorous data and writing specifications.It should not be difficult to analyze old-fashioned journals, but the impact factor has not gone up, unfortunately.

(0) 讚！ | 67762019@qq.com

Magazine editing is very good, after the draft is actively processed, the external audit time is a bit long.Requires rigorous data and writing specifications.It should not be difficult to analyze old-fashioned journals, but the impact factor has not gone up, unfortunately.

(0) 讚！ | 67762019@qq.com

analysis method article is only an internal audit. It is recommended to re-attend after the revision. It mainly raises four questions, including language problems.Currently being actively revised, I don’t know what the results will be in the future.

(0) 讚！ | Anonymous

A good journal with high requirements for the rigor of experiments and data, and low innovation requirements.In order to publish three articles, I hope that everyone will contribute to the manuscript and quote more articles from CHROMATOGRAPHIA.

(2) 讚！ | 651287561@qq.com

German journal, the editor is very responsible, the communication is very smooth, the work efficiency is very high, the first submission, it is received, very excited, very good journal

(0) 讚！ | 望觞

Very regular journal received a few articles about two months or so received notice affecting factors also improved

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

this journal our laboratory basic staffThe school requires a degree certificate to have SCI, so... This journal has lower requirements, and the analysis class is quite good. The lab has not selectd for

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

and I selectd for four months.One month with editor, three months of reviewing the manuscript has not been completed yet, I feel that I have to endless trials..

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

Why did I select for a month with the editor?Depressed...

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

It’s almost two months since I’ve been there. I haven’t commented yet. I’ve changed the status of the reviewer for a month. Maybe the first two comments are inconsistent!Hope good news!

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

The journal is still very fast. After the select, it will be returned to the revision opinion one or two months later. It will be overhauled and carefully revised according to the reviewer's suggestion. The experiment that cannot be added also explains the reason carefully..The reply was received less than one month after the return.Editors and reviewers are pretty good.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

Reviewing speed is faster, less than 2 months received a reply, after the revision, soon accepted

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

because there are fewer readers in pharmacy, so do not acceptArticle for drug analysis.The editor's reply was quite fast. I replied in 5 days.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

I tried to select for a result for less than 1 month. Overhaul, the key is that English is not well expressed.Received ten days after the repair, and soon cleared the sample, there is a network version a week after the sample.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

09, two of the 10 years of submitment are relatively smooth.This year's rejection was rejected, and journals demanded innovation.It feels more and more difficult to select....

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

I submitted a manuscript, the novelty is general, the same method, and another analysis system; two reviewers, one reviewer said that it is not novel, and lists a large amount of literature description;The two reviewers said the article was very good and raised some minor questions.Editor's comment: Overhaul, it is recommended that the author focus on the innovation of the article.The review is about 5-6 weeks. After 2 weeks, the manuscript is revised and accepted after 4 weeks. The proof is very fast.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名