I am very grateful for your help and support

(0) 讚！ | 无无无su

My experience is very similar to yours, and I also applied for terahertz. May I ask how long the initial review by the editor usually takes?

(0) 讚！ | Ptkk

After review by our topical editor, we regret to inform you that this manuscript does not meet the publication criteria of CPL. The submission should be written in good English, contain enough novel physics, and make an essential submission in a specific research area. The manuscript was rejected directly one day after review, and I am a little confused...

(2) 讚！ | williamys

It was an article related to Terahertz. It was submitted the day before the winter vacation, and the review comments came back in more than 20 days. Two reviewers each asked a small question, where the practical application was. It was accepted in one and a half month, it was quite easy, and it was recommended by the editor. I hope everyone supports domestic journals.

(1) 讚！ | Terahertz

speed is OK, the reviewer is very professional, giving a better question.Soon before, it took a lot of time to accept.

(10) 讚！ | 395687037@qq.com

The review request is still quite high, and it needs to be answered well. In addition, the English requirements are higher, and the revision is directly accepted.

(0) 讚！ | Anonymous

The thesis finally had a result. Although the reviewer was changed during the period, the responsibility of the editorial teacher is very commendable, and the work attitude is very serious and friendly.

(2) 讚！ | 匿名

Good domestic physics journal.The review speed is faster and the editor is very serious.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

The speed of reviewing is still OK. Generally, the initial review can be completed in three weeks. It takes more than 2 months to receive the acceptance notice. I selectd in June and received the acceptance notice in mid-August.I feel that the speed of reviewing is related to the reviewer. Generally, it will not be delayed. The editor is very responsible.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

After more than a month of trial, a reviewer is fully drafted, which is tooNow, I have to re-review the manuscript, oh, depressed.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

published a short article in 2008, the speed is faster, it is estimated that more than 2 months have the results of the review, minor repairAfter the re-review speed is slower, it is estimated that it took 2 months (during the summer vacation) to be published relatively quickly. It is estimated that after 6 months, the overall feeling is good. Before the final draft, the editor sent foreign experts to modify the errors on many statements.And with the amendment to let the author confirm, I feel very responsible!

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

There is a reviewer who directly and very responsibly put forward a lot of pertinent opinions, and the other directly said that I can't understand, let me write Chinese.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

Ask the insect friends you have selectd on. I will call the official website directly and contact the editor to ask about the status.Tel: (010)82649490, 82649024 I selectd in November of the 12th, and now I am looking for the fourth reviewer. I have not responded to any comments, and I am worried.

(1) 讚！ | 匿名

The article was submitted on May 29. At first, it was reviewed by two reviewers. One month later, one reviewer had reviewed it, and the other reviewer did not reply. So the editor gave the second reviewer the manuscript, and I waited for another month and a half, but he still did not review it. I called the editor, and after 5 days, it was finally reviewed by the second reviewer. Both review comments suggested modifying some inappropriate language. I changed the draft the next day and resubmitted and my paper was accepted one day later!

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

A journal that is getting more and more junk, before writing a comment hard changed to letter, no one else pointed out the mistake, I don’t know if it was like this, I was pulled into the blacklist, recently selectd twice.They are not directly sent to the trial, the Chinese academic sorrow ah

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

editor is quite serious and responsible, people are also very good!It was only when the external review was conducted that a reviewer had a slower review.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

CPC's review speed is getting slower and slower. It is fixed in 1~2 months before submission. It will take at least half a year.Some reviewers are extremely irresponsible, and they will not reply within two or three months beyond the time required for review.What's more, after a few months of delay, it is not a good thing for CPL to respond to you.It is recommended that friends who select for CPL should immediately report to the CPL when the reviewer is overdue and inaction, and promptly change the reviewer.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

The review is very fast, the proposal is given within one month, and the return of the revised opinion is also very fast, given in a few days.See the journal quickly, and see the journal in the third month from the submission.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

Publishing faster

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

is obviously not as good as Chinese physics B, it is recommended to change cpb,

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

journal is not bad,The editor is also very serious and responsible. The speed of the reviewer of your manuscript distribution depends on the speed. If the domestic reviewer may be slower, the foreign one will be very fast, but the request may be stricter.In short, it is ok, and the manuscripts for the publications are fast.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

In July of this year, the publishing fee rose from the original 900 to 1200

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

Journal Homepage URL: http://cpl.iphy.ac.cn/

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

Review the speed of reviewers, some faster and slower!But the editing speed is very fast!And seriously!!Worth submitting!

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

I don’t see it so fast. I selectd as if there is a reviewer who has exceeded the deadline and has not returned to review the comments

(0) 讚！ | 匿名