9.14 submitted
9.21 Awaiting reviewer assignment
10.08 Awaiting reviewer scores
10.28 major revision
11.5 resubmitted
11.10 Awaiting reviewer scores
11.11 Accepted

The changes in the submission status can be referred to by everyone.

(0) 讚！ | 不吃葱的喵酱

Angew arbitration was rejected, and directly switched to Catalysis Chemistry Journal.

(0) 讚！ | tianshi

9.18 Submit
9.18 Awaiting Admin Assignment
9.20 Awaiting Reviewer Selection
9.30 Awaiting Reviewer Assignment
10.06 Awaiting Reviewer Scores
10.09 Awaiting AE Decision
10.10 Awaiting Reviewer Scores
10.19 Awaiting AE Decision
10.19 Major Revisions - 3 reviewers gave minor revisions, less than 20 comments
10.23 Resubmitted
10.24 Awaiting Reviewer Assignment
10.24 Awaiting Reviewer Scores
11.04 Awaiting AE Decision
11.05 Accept

You can refer to the changes in the submission status.

(1) 讚！ | tianshi

May I ask how long it takes for Argue to receive a response after the submission is rejected?

(0) 讚！ | smd

Just because your article is accepted does not mean you can claim how great this journal is, the public's eyes are sharp. As you said, there are many articles by top catalysts in this journal, which precisely indicates how serious the circle-jerking is in this journal. Of course, there are a few high-quality articles by non-top catalysts in this journal, but they are also few in number.

(0) 讚！ | LLLPPP213

Based on past submission experiences, whether a manuscript is sent for review or accepted for publication depends mainly on the quality, depth, and innovation of the article. If the quality is not good, even if it is authored by a famous person, it may still be rejected in the initial review.

Looking at the recent publications, there are indeed many articles by well-known experts in the catalysis field, which largely indicates that the articles are recognized by authoritative experts in the field. At the same time, there are also many articles from lesser-known research groups, so one cannot conclude that as long as an article is authored by a big name, it will be accepted.

To say that 99% of the articles are from China is an exaggeration. It appears that nearly 10% of the articles are purely from foreign correspondence, and there are also cases of international and domestic collaboration.

(0) 讚！ | Pingguo

Fairness, objectivity.

(0) 讚！ | Pingguo

At first, I thought I had seen it wrong, and I thought he was evaluating JC.

(2) 讚！ | 西域村夫

Are you out of your mind, do you even know what you are talking about, crazy person.

(1) 讚！ | 2027要毕业

The only benefit of this journal for outsiders is that you can receive a rejection notice the day after submission, without wasting time.

(1) 讚！ | 小黄车

This journal does not accept submissions without letters from famous scholars, and 99% of the articles are contributed by Chinese authors. Although manipulating the impact factor can temporarily increase the impact factor and ranking, it is not recognized by foreign countries because the culture of clique is too serious. It is a long way to go to run a good domestic journal

(0) 讚！ | LLLPPP213

I think this journal is okay, with big names as correspondents. I reviewed it for two months and had to supplement a lot of quantum efficiency experiments, which was a headache

(0) 讚！ | Ph.D candidate

The circle culture of this journal is too serious, with many mediocre quality papers, but the corresponding authors are either prominent groups or big names domestically. Ordinary people are generally not invited to review, unless the innovation is very strong. A paper from our group was rejected within a week of submission because we didn't conduct quantum yield tests. After resubmitting to a German journal of applied chemistry, it was accepted. If domestic journals want to excel globally, they need to abandon this circle culture in order to expand their influence on a worldwide scale

(2) 讚！ | LLLPPP213

It feels quite difficult. The reviewers are very strict. I added a lot of synchrotron radiation and my head hurts

(1) 讚！ | qq572020211

Based on my previous submission experiences, the speed of initial review is often closely related to the content of the submission. When the submission is substantial, in-depth, and highly innovative, it often quickly moves on to the external review stage. However, if the submission is relatively small in scope or lacks significant innovation, the initial reviewers may need to spend more time evaluating the quality and value of the submission

(1) 讚！ | 探索自然

The final decision given for the submitted article is to resubmit after rejection. Overall, the depth and systematic nature of the work are still insufficient, and it has not reached the level required for publication. The reviewers provided many constructive suggestions, and the editor gave the opportunity to resubmit after rejection. It is necessary to seriously revise the article with dedication in order to hopefully be accepted upon resubmission

(1) 讚！ | CO2转化

Guessing it is an expert during the initial review

(1) 讚！ | 王浩然

The research group's highly original work, which has been submitted to other journals, has been delayed. Worried about being scooped by others, they contacted CJC to explain the situation. After the associate editor expedited the process, the paper was accepted in about a week and published in about two weeks. Very efficient!

(1) 讚！ | 王浩然

Recently submitted a new article, the editor and reviewers were very diligent and responsible, providing many constructive suggestions, and after 3 rounds of revisions, the article was accepted. Through the submission and revision process, the quality of the article greatly improved. I learned a lot from it and am very grateful to the editor

(1) 讚！ | 天马行空

The review comments have come back, it is obvious that the reviewer is from China. There are less than two hundred words and several spelling mistakes. It is clearly biased, reviewing people instead of the content

(0) 讚！ | 朱平

Awaiting AE Decision. When will we know the result?

(0) 讚！ | 朱平

Hello, may I ask what does "awaiting reviewer selection" status mean? Does it mean it's under review? What happened to the article afterwards?

(0) 讚！ | sdsxy

Domestically, it may be considered a prestigious journal, but compared to the established journal Angew, it is still lacking. Whether it is prestigious or not, we do not know. The quality comparison with ACS Catalysis is not clear, but internationally, the reputation of foreign journals is still higher than that of CJC. Both domestically and internationally, it is all about connections in the industry - having influential figures and acquaintances makes a big difference

(0) 讚！ | 打假专业户

Actually, the quality of angelw's posts has significantly decreased, especially the catalysis-related articles. So, don't be surprised if you can't laugh

(0) 讚！ | 催而化之

Although many catalytic journals have higher impact factors than CJC, such as ACB and nature catalysis, CJC is still recognized as a leading journal in the field of catalysis. Currently, this journal places great importance on the depth of mechanism research and providing concrete evidence. In situ characterization and theoretical calculations seem to have become standard practices. The reason for this is that CJC neither focuses solely on high citation potential articles like nature catalysis nor artificially boosts its impact factor through special means like some other journals. It is one of the few journals that prioritize scientific significance, audience, work quality, and innovative significance. There is reason to believe that it is an outstanding representative of domestic catalytic journals! It is worth having and investing in. It may even increase its impact factor significantly!

(0) 讚！ | 催而化之