DIP 2 week is finally back

(1) 讚！ | abcdef123456

Dip has been inactive for two weeks, not sure if we can urge him to submit the draft

(0) 讚！ | Yi-NIT

"Dip has been fast for 10 days, I don't know what's going on."

(1) 讚！ | wxq432700

It has been a week since I submitted my application, but there is still no news. The editing process seems a bit slow

(0) 讚！ | Yi-NIT

I was also rejected by the two editors

(0) 讚！ | ximenglucky

I am in the same situation. Three out of the three suggestions were accepted after submission for review, but the editor did not provide any explanation for rejection. It was a waste of one month's time and I don't understand what went wrong. The editor did not even sign their name, only a signature of "editor office"

(0) 讚！ | 环境杀我

I submitted the article in early April like you did. The editor sent it for review and three reviewers suggested minor revisions. The editor had no reason to reject the suggestions but decided to resubmit it. I don't understand what the editor is thinking. If they don't need the article, they could have just not sent it for review. What does it mean to waste someone's time?

(0) 讚！ | 环境杀我

The editor sent it for review to three reviewers. All three reviewers provided minor revisions. At the decision stage, the editor directly rejected it without any reasons and suggested submitting it elsewhere. I don't know what the editor was thinking, there weren't even any reasons given

(0) 讚！ | 环境杀我

How are you, OP?

(0) 讚！ | wdchenchen

Pretty good, not bad

(0) 讚！ | SeiSei

Submission in March 2024, rejection with suggestions for revisions (2 of which were cited) and invitation to resubmit. It seems this situation is not uncommon. This journal is such a hassle, maybe you should just avoid submitting to it and save us all some time~~~

(1) 讚！ | wszwsz

I submitted a paper on communication. It seems that the number of figures should not exceed four, and there doesn't seem to be a strict limit on the number of words. I included over 6,000 words with references. The journal's website has a PDF of the submission guidelines that you can download and refer to

(0) 讚！ | 科研小渣渣ing

When submitting your contribution, do you prefer communication or a full-length letter? Are there any specific word count and image requirements?

(0) 讚！ | book_liu

Oh my, why hasn't my paper, which was accepted in October last year, been formally published yet? There's only an In Press, Journal Pre-proof version online. I want to ask if there's any page charge to be paid afterwards? Could it be because I haven't paid the page charge yet? But there's no link for me to pay~ strange

(0) 讚！ | 科研小渣渣ing

2024/3/19 submit
2024/3/22 with editor
Hope for a good result

(0) 讚！ | 未来大牛的司机

Is there a specific word count or number of images required for submissions? And when submitting, is it generally preferred to choose communication or full research?

(0) 讚！ | book_liu

Playing like this, you'll end up playing yourself out sooner or later

(1) 讚！ | TheSoleOne

The same, feel like wasting the time of the contributors, playing with others!

(2) 讚！ | undefined

I feel the same way, there seems to be a problem with this editor

(2) 讚！ | undefined

Two reviewers recommended minor revisions, but the editor rejected it directly. What's going on?

(1) 讚！ | undefined

Classmate, how long has your submission process been?

(0) 讚！ | 姜棕熊

Both reviewers did not provide any comments on the manuscript (which is quite strange that both did not), they only gave specific suggestions, which were all superficial issues. Both reviewers recommended minor revisions (of course, the editor did not specify this, and there is no editor listed on the journal's website). I suggest submitting to another journal. If rejected, it is better to reject at the pre-review stage to avoid wasting time. I have seen other people's comments with similar experiences, not sure if this is common

(4) 讚！ | 高分子合成化学从业者

Submitted one month ago, with three reviewers, received email notification of rejection and suggestion to resubmit. 
All three reviewers suggested minor revisions for publication. 
??? The editor rejected without stating any reasons, even though all reviewers agreed. 
If the editor felt the article was not suitable, they could have rejected it in the with editor stage. 
Why did they reject without giving any reasons, even after all reviewers agreed?

(3) 讚！ | 三月

Please translate the following paragraph into English and Japanese, and title them respectively as "English Translation:" and "Japanese Translation:"

(1) 讚！ | wuyu-

9.13 submit
9.14 with editor
9.16 under review
9.23 under review
10.3 rrc
10.22 dip
10.27 revise
11.7 submit-with editor
11.17 with editor
11.19 dip
11.23 with editor (Editorial email notification received）
12.19 revise
12.25 submit-with editor
1.8 accept

(4) 讚！ | 玄武盾