So fast

(0) 讚！ | Bibi

Waiting  for the acceptance

(0) 讚！ | Bibi

Hi.
Has anyone ever encountered a situation where, during the initial evaluation, there were two reviewers, and after submitting the revised version , a third reviewer was also invited to evaluate (by editor) ?

What is the reason for this situation And how will it proceed?

(0) 讚！ | Science enthusiast

Are you making the decision on February 21st and then receiving it on March 11th?

(0) 讚！ | 冰寒之树

Did you make the decision on February 21st and then receive it on March 11th? Was there any minor adjustments in between?

(0) 讚！ | 冰寒之树

How long will it take for the rework to come back with results? Can someone kindly reply? He is my eldest son.

(0) 讚！ | 冰寒之树

Has the country's pottery now canceled the recommendation of reviewers? I only saw opposition to reviewers when submitting papers!

(0) 讚！ | Danyer

Received the job offer notification on March 11, 2025. Thank you to editor Pietro Vincenzini, thank you to the editors, thank you to the two reviewers, the processing speed was very fast.

(0) 讚！ | zhangsan

@15735658814@163.com 

This was my question too, and no one answered it until I found the answer myself through searching!

After the article is placed in the "under review" status, the corresponding author will receive an email for track submission. 

More info : Search "  Elsevier: Using Elsevier's "Track your submission" service " youtube.

(0) 讚！ | Science enthusiast

I feel like I am watching the deputy editor, which deputy editor are you handling?

(0) 讚！ | 老牛哥

2025.2.7 Reviewer comments returned, two reviewers, major revisions
2025.2.20 Revised manuscript submitted
2025.2.21 Under review

(0) 讚！ | zhangsan

The editor invited three reviewers three times, inviting 1-2 each time, so now there are five reviewers, but only one accepted the review. Why were so few invited each time?

(0) 讚！ | Breeze,

May I ask where I can see how many reviewers have been invited?

(0) 讚！ | 15735658814@163.com

Which deputy editor is handling this?

(0) 讚！ | 老牛哥

Reviewers are helpful for the paper, the review process is fast, the editing is quick, and the entire review process is standardized, making it a very good submission experience.

(0) 讚！ | 在

2024.10.04 submitted to the journal
2024.10.04 we (Editor: Pietro Vincenzini)
2024.10.04 we (Editor-in-Chief to Associate Editor: Ernesto Chicardi)
2024.10.5～10.26 under review
2024.10.26 rrc & dip
2024.10.26 major revisions
2024.11.22 revision submitted & we
2024.11.23 under review
2024.11.24 rrc
2024.11.25 dip
2024.11.25 major revision - acceptance and rejection, editor's major revisions
2024.11.27 revision submitted & we
2024.12.03 under review
2024.12.19 rrc
2024.12.20 dip
2024.12.20 accept
The editor's efficient handling and reviewers' comments helped improve the quality of the paper.

(0) 讚！ | 萌萌

So Fast
05.02.25 Submitted 
05.02.25 With Editor
06.02.25 With Sub Editor
08.02.25 Under Review

(0) 讚！ | Bibi

Hello everyone,

Can someone explain how some individuals have access to the article review process information? Such as the following details:

1.11 Under review
1.25 Invited 2, Accepted 1
1.26 Invited 2, Accepted 2
1.30 Invited 2, Accepted 2, Completed 1
2.11 Invited 2, Accepted 2, Completed 2

Is a link to track changes sent to the corresponding author after the review process begins? What is it called?
Please explain with some details.

thanks in advance.

(0) 讚！ | Science enthusiast