Hello classmates! Do you have any news now?

(0) 讚！ | 全勤王

Hello classmates! Do you have any news now?

(0) 讚！ | 全勤王

It's been a week since the second revision was submitted and the technical review was approved. Has it slowed down again recently? Does anyone have the same situation?

(0) 讚！ | 江江

Have you received a response now?

(0) 讚！ | lizhida1

I want to ask if there is a problem with the submission system of the Cellulose journal recently. Have any of your research friends encountered similar issues with the inability to submit manuscripts?

(0) 讚！ | Gala1

It has been a month and a half since the editing was informed that all the review comments have been received. It will be a huge loss if it is rejected.

(0) 讚！ | lizhida1

Modified several times, it is still "with editor" now.

(1) 讚！ | 江江

Any news, brother?

(0) 讚！ | 雨神aaaaaaaaaaa

Hello, do you have any news now? I just voted and encountered the same issue.

(0) 讚！ | 哈换

Submitting to this journal is different from submitting to others. I'm not sure if I submitted it correctly, it has been a week and it is still under technical review, with no changes so far.

(0) 讚！ | 江江

I have also been waiting for nearly a month, but still no results. Why is that?

(0) 讚！ | 雨神aaaaaaaaaaa

Brother, how long does it take for the results to come out after the modification? I have been waiting for 20 days for the rework and still haven't received any results.

(0) 讚！ | 雨神aaaaaaaaaaa

After the modification is submitted, how long does it take to see the results, experts?

(0) 讚！ | 雨神aaaaaaaaaaa

Does anyone want to add a second author during the minor revisions phase?

CELLULOSE allow adding authors?
If it allows, what needs to be done?

(0) 讚！ | 奥斯卡王尔德

Prof. Thomas Rosenau

(0) 讚！ | 全勤王

Classmate, which publisher are you waiting for edits from? It's been four or five months for me and I still haven't heard anything. It's taking forever

(1) 讚！ | SCI期刊审稿人

Wait patiently, the road ahead is long and far... The progress of this journal is indeed inconsistent, sometimes fast and sometimes slow. But the editors have a good attitude, even the chief editor is involved

(1) 讚！ | upup恺恺

Finally accepted after 5 months and two revisions

(0) 讚！ | 全勤王

Which editor is it? It's been over two months and it hasn't been sent for review yet

(0) 讚！ | SCI期刊审稿人

2024.1.27, Accepted
2023.12.02, Submission under peer review
2023.12.02, Submission passed technical check
2023.12.02, Revision received
2023.09.05, Submission under peer review
2023.09.05, Technical check
2023.09.05, Submission passed technical check
2023.09.05, Submission received

(1) 讚！ | 小杭776

I have submitted for the second time now, and I am already very familiar with cellulose. This time the review process feels a bit inconsistent, with varying speeds, mainly due to the longer response time for reviews. The editing efficiency is high, with emails typically receiving a response within 24 hours. 
Submitted on June 2nd
Major revisions based on first review on August 29th
Returned on September 11th
Major revisions based on second review on September 26th
Returned on October 2nd
Editor raised small issues on November 26th and requested minor revisions
Accepted on December 17th
Proofreading and copyright on December 27th
The article was published online 1-2 days after submission.

Both submissions went smoothly, and I encountered accommodating editors, the main editor, and reviewers. I feel that my responses to their comments were average, with particularly professional feedback from the main editor

(0) 讚！ | upup恺恺

Submission under peer review 12 Dec 2023
Revision received 11 Dec 2023
Submission under peer review 24 Nov 2023
Revision received 24 Nov 2023
Submission under peer review 20 Oct 2023
Submission received 18 Oct 2023
First two reviewers provided some comments, evaluation was positive. After making the revisions and resubmitting, external review, suddenly received a request for a second round of revisions from the editor, but the email did not include any specific comments. Emailed the editor to request clarification but did not receive any feedback. Went into the system and realized that the updated response may not have been uploaded properly, so re-uploaded it. The editor is currently evaluating the revision. A few days later, 18 reviewers were invited, out of which 3 accepted. This is one more reviewer compared to the initial two, so unsure if the revised manuscript reached the original reviewers. Uncertain about the outcome of this round of reviews. Frustrating process. The journal's feedback only asks for revisions without specifying major or minor changes, causing confusion

(0) 讚！ | 全勤王

My paper was submitted in April, and after peer review, I received feedback for major revisions. After resubmitting, I received the following feedback: "The size of text and details in the figures is still too small in several of your figures (3-5). They are not fit for print." Has anyone else encountered this issue? Any suggestions for solutions?

(0) 讚！ | 佛祖保佑顺利毕业

Hello, has your article been published yet? I am still waiting for news on publishing and rights for my submission received on October 19th, to see if any revisions are needed

(0) 讚！ | lanl

Submitted on September 16, 2022
Technical review passed on September 29, 2022
Started a long revision process on October 7, 2022 (approximately replied every two months, with about three rounds of revisions due to cellulose structure issues. It is important to check the journal's principles on cellulose structure when submitting cellulose-related papers)
Accepted on October 13, 2023
Currently waiting for news on Publishing and rights, to see if revisions are needed

(0) 讚！ | wjxc