Excuse me, where can I submit to the special issue? I saw a submission website, but I didn't notice any special issues

(0) 讚！ | sun123789

Do you not charge any layout fees? I thought mine was paid for

(0) 讚！ | lyfree2022

The questions raised by the reviewers are very professional, and the speed of journal editors in handling (plagiarism check, review, response) is also very fast. When submitting a manuscript, innovative explanations are required. No publication fees are required, and the processing speed of domestic journals is still very fast. We hope everyone can support us more!

(0) 讚！ | Yang23

This journal is very mediocre, it should be the so-called "water journal".
There are many people in the lab who submit to it, but I never do.
Either popular or not famous.

(1) 讚！ | yd

What is the speed of not submitting special publications?

(0) 讚！ | 就是爱科研

22.07.26 Submission, plagiarism check, initial review, submission for review
Reviewer 1 22.07.26——22.07.28
Reviewer 2 22.07.26——
Reviewer 3 22.10.27——22.11.09
22.11.20 Initial review and revisions, two minor revisions, need to supplement some data
22.12.05 Revisions submitted, continued submission
22.12.08 Final review by the editorial board
22.12.12 Acceptance
22.12.16 Manuscript published online
23.02.20 Official publication
Reviewer 2 caused a delay of three months, but the editorial department acted quickly, except for the time it took to receive acceptance and official publication.

(56) 讚！ | liwei001

Good luck, try to submit to special editions as much as possible. Mine is very slow, very slow.

(0) 讚！ | 生活过得去

May I ask what's the plan for the follow-up? I also have two reviewers, one from July 26th to July 28th, and the other reviewer still hasn't responded until now. It has been over 20 days since submission.

(16) 讚！ | liwei001

2022-3-11 Manuscript submission;
2022-3-12 Review, three reviewers;
2022-3-28 First review, revisions required. Only received feedback from two reviewers. Revised version returned on 3-31;
2022-4-13 Second review, revisions required. One reviewer has no further comments, but the other reviewer believes that some answers to specific questions during the initial review were not satisfactory, and requests further modifications. Revised version submitted on 4-28;
2022-5-23 Accepted for publication.

(0) 讚！ | 不三

May I know if you are aware of the reviewer's biases before receiving their comments?

(0) 讚！ | xinxin_

My 5.7 external audit, there is still no result now. Please be patient and wait.

(0) 讚！ | xinxin_

Excuse me, external auditor, one of them is between 5.3-5.5, and the other one is currently 5.3, does this mean there is little hope?

(1) 讚！ | nuliya

Hello, how is the latest situation going?

(0) 讚！ | 一peanut一

Fluid dynamics, I feel that what has been done on it is considered relatively good in China. It was submitted on March 11th, and by March 28th, there were already initial review comments, which is a very efficient process. After three days of revisions, I will provide further updates once there is news.

(2) 讚！ | 不三

During the pandemic period, the long-delayed content was sorted out and two articles were written, both of which were submitted to the Journal of Physics. One article was rejected, and the other one was accepted after revision. The manuscript processing speed of the editorial department was very fast, the reviewers were arranged as soon as the manuscript was received. Basically, the reviewers can return the comments in half a month. Two experts felt that one of the articles was too biased to the application of engineering, but lacked of physical connotation, and said that it was not suitable for being published in Journal of Physics, and it was rejected. As for the other article, one expert said something for approval but did not raise any comments. The other reviewer raised two small questions. The corresponding content was added when submitting the revised manuscript, and it was accepted directly.

(58) 讚！ | 刘尔洛

Reviewers are very protracted, and some reviewers have some paranoia.The editor gave the arbitration and changed the seven reviewers for admission.It is recommended to have a good job or to submit in English. The previous essay error in rewriting a formula was rejected by the physics journal, and the second district was changed in English.

(1) 讚！ | 老法师

From the submission to the recruitment for a total of 30 days, the editorial department handles the manuscript very powerfully.The reviewers are very efficient and the questions asked are more professional.The quality of the journal articles is good. It is estimated that because of the Chinese journals, the impact factor is low. In general, it is a rare conscience Chinese SCI. I hope it will be better and better, and I also appeal to everyone to submit high-level articles!

(0) 讚！ | Ran_Z

is very fast, the editor is very nice, as aEngaging in engineering mechanics, it is quite difficult to send paper across the line. I only recorded one of the three articles. As for the level of this publication, I would not comment. I can only say that one of the rejected ones was later translated into the journal of sound andVibration.This publication can be published one or two times. It doesn't make any sense.

(0) 讚！ | 739633869@qq.com

The journal of physics is still very fast, and the reviewer is also very serious. There is a requirement for the innovation of the article

(0) 讚！ | wyds56@163.com

Reviewing is fast, quality?Very bad, relying on self-citing

(0) 讚！ | 16906764@qq.com

experienced two repairs, one is to improve the theoretical content, one is the article format, etc., from the submission to the first-instance opinion for more than three months, after the repair, the results are quickly obtained, to determine the employment for about 4 months, or very soon

(0) 讚！ | 402585133@qq.com

4 District Chinese, domestic irrigation and recycling station, good articles are not sent up, the visitors are not rejected, self-referencing is very serious!See a colleague who sent a bunch of irrigation articles for this journal in a year, and the content would not be evaluated.

(16) 讚！ | IPCAS

The editor is very responsible, the content is not very in line with the requirements of the journal, so the editor is reluctant to refuse

(0) 讚！ | Anonymous

I like this journal too much.The speed was very fast in 2013.1.11, and 1.28 returned to the expert opinion and the editorial opinion.The opinion is very pertinent.

(2) 讚！ | 匿名

I selectd for the theoretical analysis of optics, has been acceptd, talk about feelings:

(0) 讚！ | 匿名