Hello teacher, may I ask how long it takes for you to accept revisions? I am feeling a bit anxious waiting for the revisions

(0) 讚！ | accept1111

Originally a journal in Zone 2, the impact factor has been fluctuating between 3-4 as the interest in stem cell research declines. It is a journal with a fast review process and moderate standards. Personally, I feel that the review comments are very professional, and by reading them, you can get an idea of whether the reviewers are likely to agree with or are very close to the direction you are taking. You can learn a lot during the revision process. If the content of your article is solid but lacks innovation, you can give it a try

(0) 讚！ | lijian0926

When using UnionPay payment, encountered the same issue, may I ask how did you resolve it? Thank you

(0) 讚！ | 神古巧芹

Review speed: 12.0 | Submission success rate: 5.0
Emphasized research direction: Tumor; Natural active drug
Experience sharing: Too slow, submitted on April 27th, still no news, no one responds to urge, garbage journal

(0) 讚！ | 宗室才捷

Review speed: 24.0 | Submission acceptance rate: 25.0 
Prominent research direction: Oncology 
Experience sharing: My roommate submitted a paper, it took 13 months from submission to acceptance

(0) 讚！ | 宗室才捷

Review Speed: 12.0 | Submission Hit Rate: 50.0
Emphasis on Research Direction: Tumor; Sharing of Experience with Natural Active Drugs: It's insanely slow...Submitted on April 27th, reviewed on May 9th, it's already been 4 and a half months. The manuscript interface for urging reviews doesn't reply, so I found the associate editor's personal email, and occasionally they reply to me. But the editorial department won't rush the reviewers, just very zen a couple more reviewers... Just waiting

(0) 讚！ | 宗室才捷

Review speed: 12.0 | Submission hit rate: 50.0 Experience sharing: slow

(0) 讚！ | 白云锐思

Review speed: 24.0 | Submission success rate: 50.0
Experience sharing: Be cautious when submitting your paper if you are eager to graduate, as the review process is unusually slow

(0) 讚！ | 白云锐思

"P

(0) 讚！ | 仲夏甜茜

Recently, I was invited to help with reviewing a manuscript. I reviewed it very carefully and provided valuable feedback. It seemed to be a research topic for a graduate student, and I thought it was done quite well. There were some small requests for the author to supplement additional data, which I thought was a pity. However, the second reviewer gave a low rating and recommended reconsideration. I don't know how it will develop from here. Of course, as a reviewer, I am willing to support the author. After all, they have put in a lot of hard work!

(0) 讚！ | 我是涛哥哥

Why can't I pay the layout fee after accepting it? The link always says "The transaction could not be processed." Is there anyone who can help me with this?

(0) 讚！ | 书生振琪

Choose the post-hoc test method based on the data results obtained

(0) 讚！ | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

Statistics generally uses the p-value obtained from significance testing methods, with P

(0) 讚！ | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

What kind of post hoc test should I use?

(0) 讚！ | 龙鳞孝礼

Please translate the following paragraph into English and Japanese, and title them ":" and ":"

(0) 讚！ | 平原文波

Today I received an email asking for payment of $2300. Does anyone know how to make the payment and what is the deadline?

(0) 讚！ | 上清雨真

It is gratifying to see this journal steadily rising. There are reasons for strictness, as long as it is not rejection, I am willing to wait

(0) 讚！ | 上清雨真

Research focus: Clinical research experience sharing: Submitted in May, revised multiple times, received a response this month, reviewers are satisfied, expected to be online next year

(0) 讚！ | 上清雨真

Reviewing is really slow, the review process is also very strict, receiving a lot of revision suggestions, but the revisions are very helpful, I think it's very useful for improving personal articles. It can only be said that it is more suitable for people who are confident in their own writing

(0) 讚！ | 上清雨真

The first review will take a while, so if you're in a rush, it's better not to submit. They also have strict requirements for articles, so it's best suited for experienced writers to submit

(0) 讚！ | 上清雨真

Reviewing takes 8-12 weeks, but it can be expedited. The second review is generally faster than the first review, taking around two to three weeks

(0) 讚！ | 上清雨真

Review speed: 3.0 | Submission acceptance rate: 50.0
Experience sharing: Received an email this month accepting the submission, preparing to pay the APC which is not as expensive as rumored, now it is $2300

(0) 讚！ | 上清雨真

My supervisor said my article was written very well, but I was still nervous when I first submitted it for publication at the end of June. There were no major revisions, just one minor revision, and I just received an acceptance email. Although it was not a quick process, as long as the article is solid, I should still have confidence!

(0) 讚！ | 上清雨真

Submitted in May, received first review in July, second review in September, finally received a response in November. It's not a superficial journal, the revision suggestions were very detailed, and it took 4 revisions to pass. However, the overall improvement of the article is significant, and I am very satisfied with my own work. I hope to receive the email proof as soon as possible

(0) 讚！ | 上清雨真

Submitted once in 2019, got rejected. My article was not very well-written back then. I spent the past two years learning, analyzing, and rewriting. I submitted again in October and received revision comments this month. I am very happy that it was not rejected this time

(0) 讚！ | 上清雨真