May I ask how much the layout fee is?

(1) 讚！ | 姜姜1

2.8 Submission with editor, updated time after ten days, still with editor
2.17 Under review
3.13 Major revision, but no need for additional experiments, changes are relatively easy
3.21 Revised
3.25 Accepted
Overall, the speed is relatively fast.

(0) 讚！ | 小郭啊

After submission, the time changed one week later with the editor, but it is still with the editor. Did the editor change?

(0) 讚！ | 小郭啊

It has been half a month since submission, and only one reviewer has accepted the review. How long does the first review usually take? How many reviewers are there typically?

(0) 讚！ | 欲郁郁

CEJ suggests transferring investments. Transfers do not incur OA fees.

(0) 讚！ | ayaa

Your layout fee is a crossbreed, huh?

(0) 讚！ | 玺气烊烊girl

May I ask how your article turned out in the end? How should the page fee be paid?

(0) 讚！ | 玺气烊烊girl

It has already become a paid journal.

(9) 讚！ | 5555555

Does anyone have submitted to this journal after September 2020? It is said that there is a page charge. I don't understand, what does it mean? Can someone interpret it? It seems that only gold open access is available, can I still publish if I don't choose open access? I realized this issue only after I submitted.

(1) 讚！ | ddddtt

Did you pay the layout fee? Can you only pay the fee and have no other choice?

(0) 讚！ | ddddtt

Denitrification direction
2020.12.9 Submitted
12.11 With editor
12.16 Under review
2021.1.8 Major Revision (rejected once, revised heavily for a month)
2.6 Revised
2.17 editor
2.21 Provisional Accept
3.1 Accept
Overall, it went relatively smoothly, but unfortunately, there is a page fee of $2000 for the OA submission.

(2) 讚！ | 大砻坊人

The news of the first review was given in 2 months. One month after the submission of revision, it was accepted. The speed was not fast. The comments raised by the reviewers were very pertinent, and it can be seen at a glance that he was an expert in the field. In particular, it should be praised that the editor personally revised and polished the language free of charge. I was toughed. The editor was responsible. I hope it gets better and better. After all, it is a time-honored journal. I hope the impact factor can be over 4. It is strongly recommended that work with certain innovation should be submitted to this journal.

(1) 讚！ | chengquan

First review: 28 days; major revision: 21 days. Comments were received from one reviewer and the editor. We revised it for 12 days and returned it back. 28 days later, the editor responded to accept it, but needs to be approved. It was the editor who helped polishing the language. The editor-in-chief, Angelos M Efstathiou, is particularly good. I had already asked a few people to help modifying the language, but it still had some problems. The editor then personally helped me to polish it. Special thanks to him. This journal has a high requirement for language because of its short length. The research should have a certain novelty. Moderate difficulty to be accepted.

(2) 讚！ | ffx1

2019.1.3 Submission; 2019.1.30 Major revision. 2019.2.28 Resubmission; 2019.3.5 Accepted directly. At that time, one reviewer gave a minor revision, the other rejected it directly, and then made various criticisms, said that the grade of the article was lower than 40% of the same level. If you resubmit, it will be rejected again. At that time, I wanted to cry. After half a month of revising the manuscript carefully, the editors gave the acceptance. I am very grateful to the editors. The editors of Catalysis Communications are very reliable, it is very good. I hope this journal can be included in Q2. After all, it is an old-branded journal. It is very good.

(1) 讚！ | 欧阳小土豆

Which of the gods who selectd for the manuscript, my technical review has not been closed

(0) 讚！ | 763342398@qq.com

2018. 1. 31 submission2018. 3. 1 minor repair2018. 3. 8 back2018. 3. 10 receiving
 This journal should go up, so many years

(2) 讚！ | Anonymous

2018. 1. 31 submission2018. 3. 1 minor repair2018. 3. 8 back2018. 3. 10 receiving
 This journal should go up for so many years

(0) 讚！ | Anonymous

2017.11.14 contribution,2018.12.15, two results come back, overhaul;2018.12.29, repaired;No. 2018.1.14, directly accepted;2018.1.17, proof;2018.1.20, online with page number.Published in 2014,In short, the editor is efficient and friendly.There will be a review result in the basic 15 days.But I found a problem, found on the website that the stock of the journal's employment papers is very good, probably less than 50, now.

(0) 讚！ | tonycjlu

After overhauling twice, edit the touch once and accept it.This journal is very reliable. As long as the opportunity is overhauled and the response is serious, the general editor will be very patient, not casually drafted, and highly efficient.I am very grateful to the editor for helping me to modify it word by word, and the quality of the article has indeed improved.

(1) 讚！ | piece35

Okay!The editor is still very responsible. At the beginning of the select, I will reply to you in 40 days.Changed the data for 2 weeks, and then selectd!Give me a reply in 30 days and accept minor repairs!Accepted for 17 days after the modification!Duration: 40 30 17=88 day

(0) 讚！ | YOUNG

submitted at the end of April, notified the overhaul after three weeks, and acceptd two weeks after the repairThe manuscript is about immobilized enzymes. Compared to other manuscripts in this journal, the content is more biased. The French editor is very efficient.Good journal

(5) 讚！ | tony

Submitted at the end of April, notified the overhaul after three weeks, and acceptd two weeks after the repairThe manuscript is about immobilized enzymes. Compared to other manuscripts in this journal, the content is more biased. The French editor is very efficient.Good journal

(5) 讚！ | tony

Submitted on July 22nd, the review comments were received on September 17th, and the three reviewers returned to the revised draft on October 16th.And then returning to the reviewer on November 12th, the reviewer responded to the comments on November 18th in the field of multiphase catalysis, the German editor is very responsible, and the delivery speed is very fast

(3) 讚！ | 匿名

The review speed is very fast, submitted on September 6th, 12 UnderReview, No. 27 returned to the opinion overhaul on October 25, and received the next day!The editors are very good, and the reviewers give positive comments.Very good and very efficient journal.

(2) 讚！ | 匿名

contributed on the 11th of October, did not receive the confirmation letter, has not assigned the manuscript number, the status is submitted to journal, why is my slow!

(0) 讚！ | 匿名