期刊簡介 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
期刊名稱![]() | Cardiovascular Diabetology LetPub Score 7.3
50 ratings
Rate
Reputation 7.9 Influence 6.8 Speed 6.9 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
期刊簡稱 | CARDIOVASC DIABETOL | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
ISSN | 1475-2840 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
h-index | 64 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
CiteScore |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
自引率 (2023-2024) | 16.50%自引率趨勢 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
掲載範囲 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
官方網站 | http://cardiab.biomedcentral.com | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
在線稿件提交 | https://submission.nature.com/new-submission/12933/3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
開放訪問 | Yes | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
出版商 | BioMed Central | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
主題領域 | 医学 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
出版國/地區 | ENGLAND | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
發行頻率 | 不定期刊行 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
創刊年 | 2002 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
每年文章數 | 335每年文章數趨勢 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
黃金OA百分比 | 99.76% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
OA Related Info![]() | APC: Yes( GBP2990; USD3990; EUR3390; ) APC waiver:Check Notes Other charges: No Keywords: cardiovascular medicine、diabetes、metabolic syndrome Useful LinksAims & ScopeAuthor InstructionsEditorial BoardAnonymous peer review | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Web of Science 四分位 ( 2023-2024) | WOS Quartile: Q1
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
索引 (SCI or SCIE) | Science Citation Index Expanded | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
鏈接到PubMed Central (PMC) | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=1475-2840%5BISSN%5D | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
平均審稿時間 * | 來自出版商的數據: 來自作者的數據: Average 1 Month(s) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
競爭力 * | 來自作者的數據: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
參考鏈接 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
*所有的審稿過程指標,如接受率和審稿速度,僅限於用戶提交的稿件。因此,這些指標可能無法準確反映期刊的競爭力或速度。 |
|
|
|
首頁 上一頁 1 2 3 4 5 6 下一頁 末頁 (頁 | |
[Cardiovascular Diabetology] 的評論 | 撰寫評論 |
作者: Adelaide Lawson 領域: 医学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2024-10-13 19:49:45 評論於 Teacher, have your manuscript been accepted now? Please share. ![]() ![]() |
作者: 凌霄方方 領域: 医学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2024-10-13 15:17:50 評論於 It has been a month and a half since the submission to receiving comments from external reviewers. Without conducting additional experiments, I wasted three weeks on revisions. After resubmitting, it took five days to receive acceptance. The submission was done as an amateur, with a common background in communication. However, one of the affiliated units has a collaboration laboratory with an academician, which may have a positive impact. ![]() ![]() |
作者: Adelaide Lawson 領域: 医学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2024-10-12 12:51:30 評論於 Sure, sure. Bring good luck. How long did you take for the total duration? ![]() ![]() |
作者: 凌霄方方 領域: 医学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2024-10-10 09:56:02 評論於 Review speed: 1.0 Experience sharing: The wish has come true. The first basic article was accepted, and after submission, it passed the technical check within a few days and was quickly sent for external review. The review came back after a month, and the reviewer did not require any additional experiments. After a few days of revisions, the article was accepted. It was about diabetic cardiomyopathy and iron death. I feel that the editor approves of the article, and the reviewer was probably satisfied. Good luck to everyone. ![]() ![]() |
作者: kunkung 領域: 医学 審稿時間: 1.0 month(s) 結果: 拒稿 撰寫評論 |
2024-10-04 16:49:25 評論於 Trash magazines, specializing in collecting articles with various TYG-like indicators, numerous statistical methodological errors, and extremely poor quality. Is there insider trading going on? Clearly meeting the scope of the journal's submission, they are directly rejected with "not in line with the journal's scope", editors!!! Do you read the title? Do you read the abstract? Do you read the manuscript? ![]() ![]() |
作者: 东京腾逸 領域: 医学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2024-07-14 13:54:45 評論於 How are you doing now? ![]() ![]() |
作者: 雾都飞莲 領域: 医学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2024-06-10 18:17:06 評論於 It has been 20 days, what's going on? ![]() ![]() |
作者: 舒兰小仙女 領域: 医学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2024-06-09 22:30:05 評論於 It's been two weeks since I last heard from you. How have you been? ![]() ![]() |
作者: 雾都飞莲 領域: 医学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2024-06-04 17:24:39 評論於 Excuse me, has your technical review been approved? It's been 10 days already. ![]() ![]() |
作者: 雾都飞莲 領域: 医学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2024-06-02 11:51:13 評論於 It's been 10 days, time used to pass by quickly. ![]() ![]() |
作者: Fay Faulkner 領域: 医学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2024-05-29 10:39:55 評論於 Please translate the following paragraph into English and Japanese, and label them ":" and ":" ![]() ![]() |
作者: 破戒悦宜 領域: 医学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2024-05-28 08:09:50 評論於 May I ask if the review has been approved now? It's been over a week and there hasn't been any progress ![]() ![]() |
作者: 魔都玉航 領域: 医学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2024-05-25 10:53:39 評論於 Is the peer review submitted for external review? How long has your status been like this? ![]() ![]() |
作者: 魔都玉航 領域: 医学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2024-05-23 23:19:52 評論於 Should I send this for external review or directly to the editor? ![]() ![]() |
作者: 魔都玉航 領域: 医学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2024-05-23 21:18:00 評論於 What's your status now? I'm also on a one-week break ![]() ![]() |
作者: 开心的小墨墨 領域: 医学 審稿時間: 1.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2024-05-21 22:38:53 評論於 My technical review has been over 6 days, no progress at all. How much longer do I have to wait? I'm anxious ![]() ![]() |
作者: 王大锤 領域: 医学 審稿時間: 8.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2024-05-20 23:57:27 評論於 How long does the technical review take? I've been waiting for over a week ![]() ![]() |
作者: 金山纪阳 領域: 医学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2024-05-20 08:14:26 評論於 Has it been sent for review, or for editing? ![]() ![]() |
作者: 金山纪阳 領域: 医学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2024-05-19 12:38:07 評論於 How long does your technical review take? It's been over a week for mine ![]() ![]() |
作者: 金山纪阳 領域: 医学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2024-05-19 11:50:05 評論於 How long have you been waiting for your technical review? ![]() ![]() |
作者: 金山纪阳 領域: 医学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2024-05-18 13:37:24 評論於 Technical review has been going on for a week, it's too slow, how long is yours? ![]() ![]() |
作者: 金山纪阳 領域: 医学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2024-05-17 19:01:11 評論於 How long has your technical review taken? Mine has been a week and still at the initial technical review stage ![]() ![]() |
作者: 北海慧琴 領域: 医学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2024-05-17 14:14:49 評論於 With such a high self-quarantine rate, are people not worried? ![]() ![]() |
作者: 金山纪阳 領域: 医学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2024-05-16 08:29:02 評論於 The technical review has been a week, and it hasn't reached the editing department yet. How much longer will it take? ![]() ![]() |
作者: 江南远悦 領域: 医学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2024-05-15 12:09:52 評論於 Do you need a plagiarism report or a proofreading report? ![]() ![]() |
首頁 上一頁 1 2 3 4 5 6 下一頁 末頁 (頁 |
Contact us