One month later, I wrote a reminder letter to the editor, and sure enough, the domestic editor was changed the next day. The paper was submitted for review on the third day, and ten days later, feedback from three reviewers was received. After revising for two weeks, the paper was accepted three days later. This is the second paper on Carbon accepted this year. I hope to return to Zone 1 as soon as possible

(0) 讚！ | 一贱封神

Don't worry, we all start from one month

(0) 讚！ | rio-djo

5.25 Review feedback received (from two reviewers, with over a dozen questions)
6.14 Revised version sent back
6.18 Waiting for Editor

(0) 讚！ | rio-djo

I have been waiting anxiously for a week since I submitted my manuscript

(0) 讚！ | 且罢

20240329 Submission
20240403 Under review
20240510 Revision (Reviewed by four reviewers with 38 comments)
20240603 Submit revised manuscript
20240608 Under review 
20240616 Acceptance

(1) 讚！ | Pu

It has been a week since I submitted the article on 6.10, and we are still waiting. This is really frustrating

(0) 讚！ | 且罢

Hello, may I ask which editor you are?

(0) 讚！ | aochenhit

How long was the interval between receiving the copyedited manuscript and the final proof from you?

(0) 讚！ | txqqzyy

May I ask how long it has been since you received the edited manuscript of your article?

(0) 讚！ | txqqzyy

May I ask how long it took for you to receive the edited version of your article?

(0) 讚！ | txqqzyy

5.27, reject

(1) 讚！ | cfiber

Has your result come out?

(0) 讚！ | cfiber

One month is really too long! There's no reason to take this long

(0) 讚！ | cfiber

15 days is very fast, with a large amount of submissions, editors need to make a decision on whether to send them for review

(0) 讚！ | txqqzyy

My two submissions both took one month for the editors to make a decision, which was considered the faster one in fifteen days

(0) 讚！ | rio-djo

Why does it have to take so long for review?

(1) 讚！ | cfiber

15 days is really too long, I don't understand why it takes so long!

(0) 讚！ | cfiber

Be patient. A decision will generally be made in about 15 days. Please do not rush

(0) 讚！ | txqqzyy

Normally, a decision will be made in about 15 days. Please do not rush. Be patient and wait

(0) 讚！ | txqqzyy

The submission process went smoothly, lasting three months. I worked on graphene aerogels, with four reviewers in the first round of review. Reviewer #123 gave minor revisions while Reviewer #4 rejected the submission, citing a lack of innovation. After receiving major revisions suggested by the editor to persuade the rejecting reviewer, the submission was eventually accepted. In the second round of review, Reviewer #2 also rejected the submission after I modified a piece of data without providing a satisfactory explanation. The reviewer suspected data falsification and gave a rejection. After providing the original data, detailed explanations for the modifications, and the calculation process, I was able to prove that the data was not manipulated. Finally, the submission was accepted. Overall, the processing speed was fast, and I am grateful to the editor. I wish CARBON continued success

(0) 讚！ | txqqzyy

2024.02.27 submit
2024.02.28 with editor
2024.03.11 under review
2024.03.29 major revision
2024.04.29 submit
2024.04.30 with editor
2024.05.02 under review
2024.05.08 major revision
2024.05.18 submit
2024.05.19 with editor
2024.05.20 under review 
2024.05.21 accept

(0) 讚！ | txqqzyy

Submitted 5 days ago, still with editor

(0) 讚！ | cfiber

The editor seems very busy, or with editor

(0) 讚！ | cfiber

5.21 Required Reviews Completed
Is it really okay to torture authors like this, even Carbon, a prestigious journal?

(1) 讚！ | rio-djo

I have been reworked for the second time. I submitted the rework on May 17th and am waiting for the results

(0) 讚！ | txqqzyy