Do you need the full map of World of Warcraft?

(0) 讚！ | 建柏mio

Review speed: 2.0 | Submission hit rate: 75.0 Emphasized research directions: Oncology; Pharmacology; Chemotherapy experience sharing: A small review manuscript has been submitted for three weeks for the first time, but it is still editor assigned, and I feel it is too slow so I withdrew the manuscript. Then it was rejected by others, so I submitted it again later. The second submission was on 2023-05-17 submitted 2023-05-18 Reviewers Assigned (changed on 06-02 halfway) 2023-06-05 Under Review 2023-06-09 Reviewers Assigned (changed on 06-15, 06-23, 07-03, 07-10 halfway) 2023-07-17 minor revision (given ten days for minor revisions, with only one reviewer, editor pointed out that English level and abstract were too short, so I sent back a revised version, and it was returned on the 23rd. Then because of some formatting issues, it was returned immediately, and resubmitted on the 24th) 2023-07-24 Editor assigned 2023-07-27 Accept

(0) 讚！ | 猫巷少女怀双

Any news?

(0) 讚！ | 岭南正初

Hello, how long does it take after online publication to officially be published?

(0) 讚！ | 书生梦幻

Hello, how much is the layout fee?

(0) 讚！ | 金山沛容

Not necessary

(0) 讚！ | 元绿酱大魔王

Does WB need the full original image?

(0) 讚！ | 宗室忆安

Review speed: 3.0 | Submission acceptance rate: 50.0
Emphasized research direction: Cancer; Pharmacology experience sharing: The first review is very fast, about one week, minor revisions take about a month and a half, and once revised, it is accepted within half a day, very efficient

(0) 讚！ | 风见妙晴

Review speed: 1.0 | Submission hit rate: 75.0 
Research focus: Tumors; Experience sharing on chemotherapy: Submitted at the end of August, received reviewer comments in September requesting a small experiment, resubmitted in November, accepted within a week, and published by the end of December

(0) 讚！ | Donald Catharine

Prepare the complete map of the World Bank

(0) 讚！ | 玄冰姣妍

Do you need the raw data?

(0) 讚！ | 华清冬雁

Do you want the raw data?

(0) 讚！ | 华清冬雁

Try to make up for the experiment as much as possible if conditions allow. If it is really not possible, then carefully consider reasons for defense, but a humble and cautious attitude is essential. After all, there is also a certain rejection rate for major revisions

(0) 讚！ | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

Issues related to experiments and writing articles

(0) 讚！ | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

What questions do reviewers and journal editors generally ask?

(0) 讚！ | 八坂篷蔚

The reviewer required me to conduct additional experiments, but my samples have already been used up/the experiment has already been completed. Will my paper be rejected if I directly state that my samples have been used up?

(0) 讚！ | 龙鳞孝礼

The paper has been accepted, with a total processing time of nearly 4 months. The editor-in-chief is very kind, and the reviewers are very professional, providing me with excellent insights for my paper. Overall, it is a very good journal!

(0) 讚！ | 小野寺英范

Review speed: 3.0
Emphasis on research direction: tumor; experience sharing on chemotherapy: I would like to ask everyone, what is the possibility of being rejected after major revision? The reviewer's comments were very good, although they gave a major revision, mainly focusing on modifying the discussion section. The major revision suggestions mainly provided some ideas from the reviewer, which I have all incorporated into the discussion section. It has been under review for 1 week

(0) 讚！ | 小野寺英范

Have you got any news?

(0) 讚！ | Doreen Bertha

It is an American magazine, not German one

(0) 讚！ | 元绿酱大魔王

1 month after submission, received a message. Minor revisions were accepted, answered questions point to point as required, added some polish. It has been over half a month since resubmission, still under review. Probably the reviewers are not satisfied, it might get rejected

(0) 讚！ | 元绿酱大魔王

How long after the online will be officially published
wind1060 2018-01-09 21:01:00 Posted: If the magazine does not choose open access, you do not need to pay for the layout. The editor is relatively friendly, the opinions of the reviewers are very professional. It took two months for a submitted article to be reviewed, and then 1.5 months were given for experiments and revisions. A new experiment was added, and the questions were answered carefully as required. After the revisions, it was reviewed for another half month and then accepted. Proof was received about half a month after acceptance, with a 2-day deadline for proofreading. The article was online the day after the proof was returned. Overall, the efficiency was quite high, and the Germans are indeed very responsible. Good luck to everyone!

(0) 讚！ | 终幕嘉俊

Haha, scored a three-pointer!

(0) 讚！ | 葵花谷兰

What happened later? It's been almost 3 weeks, have you not found any reviewers yet? It has been showing "Reviewers Assigned" the whole time, plus 10 days for delivery processing, a month wasted, the speed is really slow! I won't submit again next time!

(0) 讚！ | 宫古晨星

Review Speed: 3.0 | Submission Hit Rate: 50.0
Experience Sharing: The review process of this journal is relatively slow (I submitted in early May and received the reviewer's comments in early August, almost 3 months), but the reviewers' comments are very professional, and the editors are very kind. Despite major revisions being requested, the editor expressed a willingness to accept the paper. After 1.5 months of revisions, carefully addressing the reviewers' comments and conducting 3 additional experiments, the paper was accepted 9 days after resubmission. The proofreading and online publication processes were both very fast. In conclusion, the slowest step was the initial review. I feel that the reviewers and editors were very helpful to me, and the editor was very nice

(0) 讚！ | 葵花谷兰