Employed in May 2024

(1) 讚！ | 厚德载物V

I would like to ask, compared with this journal, which one is of higher quality, this journal or the International Journal of Geomechanics?

(0) 讚！ | hh-

I am for everyone, everyone is for me. Evaluation: minus points!!!
Submission: 21-Dec-2023
Rejection: 14-Apr-2024
There were a total of 2 reviewers, both of whom agreed to accept the paper, but the editor decided to reject it directly! What the heck! I waited for so many months, I am truly fed up!

(0) 讚！ | 一碗鸡汤

The speed is really slow
Submitted in September 2023
Major revision in December 2023
Minor revision in February 2024
Minor revision in March 2024

(1) 讚！ | 厚德载物V

I can only say that it's not bad

(0) 讚！ | 人艰不拆

I submitted a paper on the physics model aspect, but I feel like the experts didn't read the article carefully and their comments are a bit disgusting. However, the review process was quite fast, so I'll see what the outcome is when I receive the revisions

(0) 讚！ | 陶通伟

After a month and a half, one expert gave feedback, one expert rejected the manuscript, and one expert requested major revisions. The editor ultimately requested major revisions as well. However, it was difficult to make the suggested changes, and it seemed like the experts did not carefully read the article

(0) 讚！ | 陶通伟

2023.7.3 Submission
2023.7.9 Awaiting AE Assignment
I would like to ask, how much longer do I have to wait for the AE Assignment? I am a little anxious!

(0) 讚！ | 人艰不拆

Hello, I would like to ask how long is the review period for geotechnical submissions in Canada. Thank you.

(0) 讚！ | virtue320

Hello, I would like to ask if this journal has a template?

(0) 讚！ | 对峙

Very good journal, very difficult.

(20) 讚！ | yu@enpc

I published an article at the beginning of this year, but this journal can't be compared to Geotechnique and ASCE-JGGE. However, now there are several other journals with a large number of submissions. The Canadian Geotechnical Journal is also doing well, so it can be considered relatively difficult to get published in.

(0) 讚！ | smallcavity

The level of articles in the Canadian Geotechnical Journal used to be really high, but at some point, I don't know when, this journal became a watering hole for some big shots. Now the level of this journal is really low, and it can't be compared to Geotechnique and the Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering under ASCE. When submitting a paper, there were three reviewers, and only one of them reviewed it seriously. Firstly, they acknowledged the paper's novelty but had doubts about the simplification of the model. They requested a detailed description of the modeling process and recommended major revisions. The other two were simply ridiculous, they didn't even bother to read the paper seriously. They probably only looked at the authors' names and affiliations and wanted to reject the paper. Their reviewing attitude is simply unbelievable for reviewers of the Canadian Geotechnical Journal. None of their suggestions hit the core of the paper.

(22) 讚！ | 换个名字

I had submitted a paper, which was then rejected by the editor without even a chance for peer review. He decided that the methods used in the paper were not "novel" enough. Funny thing is, papers based on results obtained with similar methods were published in last 2 years. 
This journal does not publish that many papers annually and thus it has pretty high rejection rate as they have to keep some room open for "celebrity" researchers (mostly people from the editorial board).

(1) 讚！ | Annonymous

Reviewing is very fast, not as long as online.Thanks to the reviewers, assistant editors and editors for their contributions!

(1) 讚！ | Anonymous

has submitted an article. Due to the long time of the editor incumbent, the review process has been slowed down, and the review has been reviewed for 13 months. Finally, one reviewer is already very good and the other is very poor.The editor-in-chief refused.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

The CGJ submission system was updated during the middle of our submission. It was super frustrating, and the review speed was incredibly slow as a result. We submitted our manuscript in April 2011, and it was finally accepted in December of the following year. Good grief it was a long time. Hopefully the review period is quicker these days as the submission system has been implemented for a while.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

A reviewer's opinion on a foreigner is acceptable. One China's review comments were extremely poor and the results were rejected.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

Journal Homepage URL: http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/journal/cgj

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

Four and a half months return comments revised and reviewed for 2 months last acceptThe journal is the most famous three major journals in the field of geotechnical engineering. The papers published in the theoretical trials of large-scale engineering examples

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

submitted the reviewer's opinion after 5 months, very pertinent, two weeksAccepted within one week after the time is modified.A total of half a year has been acceptd

(0) 讚！ | 匿名