Only one reviewer agreed to review the manuscript, and it has been in this state for over a month without the editor inviting other reviewers.

(0) 讚！ | 勇者骑恶龙

Submitted on March 28, 2023.
Reviewed on December 29, 2023, with two reviewers providing major and minor revisions, with the status changing to "Reviewers assigned" multiple times during the process.
Accepted on March 2, 2024.

The journal is great, albeit the long publication period. However, with a positive outcome, it is all worth it!

(0) 讚！ | AcceptOne

I have been waiting for a month and I am still in the "reviewers assigned" stage.

(0) 讚！ | JIM-XIANFEN

Hello, how is your thesis going?

(0) 讚！ | jojoDuan

Dec 15, 2022, New submission
I don't know how efficient this magazine is. The official website says that the average time to receive the initial review results is 45 days.

(0) 讚！ | Roderick

Hello, may I ask if the revised draft needs to separate the text and images? Or can I just insert the images into the corresponding positions in the main text, just like when submitting the article? Thank you.

(0) 讚！ | LizzyQiao

Hello, may I ask if the revised draft needs to separate the images and place them individually or if they can be directly inserted into the corresponding positions? Thank you!

(0) 讚！ | LizzyQiao

2021 5.22 Submission
2021 11.02 Received comments from external reviewers, a total of three reviewers, with a long review period. Sent multiple emails to the editorial department to urge the review.
2021 11.17 Submitted revised manuscript
2022 1.25 Accepted

(1) 讚！ | 寒鸦微凉

11.28 Submission
12.7 Under review
12.14--Currently Under review

(0) 讚！ | 张大亮

The manuscript was initially submitted to ES, and after major revisions, four reviewers agreed to accept it, but one reviewer rejected it. The editor also rejected it.
After careful revision, it was resubmitted to Bulletin. The following is the submission record:
8.20 Submitted; 8.21 Editor Assigned; Editor invited;
8.22 Reviewer assigned, under review; 8.28 Under review; 10.12 Editor Assigned; 11.9 Reviewer assigned;
11.10 Under review, 11.20 Under review; 12.17 Editor Assigned; 12.20 Editor Assigned, 12.20 Under review; 12.31 Accepted
The journal handled the manuscript quickly, and the editor was responsible. The reviewers were scholars who performed relatively well in the field, and most of their suggestions were constructive. They were strict but provided opportunities for revision, resulting in two rounds of acceptance.
We hope the journal will continue to improve.

(4) 讚！ | 蔡小帅

The journal has a high influence in the field of earthquake engineering. The questions raised by the two reviewers are of high quality, and their suggestions greatly contribute to improving the paper.

(0) 讚！ | Dream on the way

Submission: 24 June 2020. 
Acceptance after two major revisions: 06 February 2021.
Published online: 26 February 2021.
Reviewers were really professional and their comments improved the quality of the paper. I will definitely submit more papers to this journal.

(0) 讚！ | seyed.viand@altinbas.edu.tr

The influence of the journal is very great, the three reviewers were very responsible, and the questions were raised sharply and their level was very high! Reply must be taken seriously! It was easy to be rejected when revising the manuscripts!

(0) 讚！ | yf23227

Two reviewers. It was sent to reviewers on March 22; Comments returned on July 26, major revision; the revised manuscript was submitted on September 23; major revisions of supplementing experiments were required on October 20; it was submitted again on December 20 and was directly accepted the next day. The reviewers were very strict, and the questions he raised were sharp to the point. They were very friendly to authors. The manuscript was not rejected for two major revisions. They were principled but not too cold.

(0) 讚！ | 法克妄语

I submitted it on January 22, the result of first review came out in nearly two months, and it was major revision. There were two reviewers and many comments, but the comments were all on technology. I submitted the manuscript after revising it attentively for a month. The comments of second review came out in one month, it was minor revision. One reviewer accepted it and another one gave the minor revision; it was all minor issues. I revised it for one week and submitted the second-revised manuscript. It was accepted in a month, that is, it was accepted on June 5.

(0) 讚！ | 桂成

three reviewers, the review comments are very sharp, it takes a long time, have patience, the editor is very nice

(0) 讚！ | alre

If you submit to this journal you need to have some patience. The editor and reviewers are all professional, but it takes time to receive the reviews. The reviewers’ comments were very pertinent and detailed.

(1) 讚！ | alre

2018.4.6 under review2018.5.29 editor assignedI don't know how to follow

(0) 讚！ | weilicivil

Three reviewers, put forward a lot of opinions, ask for quite high

(0) 讚！ | 123456