Should I upload all the original data or just the WB?

(0) 讚！ | linlang0402

Is all the data uploaded or just the WB uploaded?

(0) 讚！ | linlang0402

Do you need all the raw data, or just the WB?

(0) 讚！ | linlang0402

Do you need to upload all original records or just the WB?

(0) 讚！ | linlang0402

Do you charge a layout fee?

(0) 讚！ | Jamie Carpenter

Do you charge a layout fee?

(0) 讚！ | Jamie Carpenter

It took nearly a year for the journal to accept the submission. The standards of the journal are very high, requiring a minimum of 5 for both data replication and sample size. Original data must be submitted, and the journal editors are very thorough and responsible. It is a top pharmacology journal with a lot of influence! Just not sure why it is in the 2nd tier of the Chinese Academy of Sciences

(1) 讚！ | xuduoduoduo

How long is your final review, and has the article been accepted?

(0) 讚！ | 桂昌酱

How are you doing?

(0) 讚！ | 香风笑春

I have the same question

(0) 讚！ | 桂昌酱

Domestic pharmaceutical journals are still at level 1. BJP is still a classic old magazine

(0) 讚！ | 水桥祺瑞

Review speed: 6.0 | Submission hit rate: 50.0 Emphasized research direction: pharmaceutical experience sharing: The latest Chinese Academy of Sciences zone shows as 2nd tier non-top, an old pharmaceutical journal is now declining, which is really surprising!

(0) 讚！ | 雨巷少年乐意

I would like to ask about the submission timeline of this journal

(0) 讚！ | 平原觅雁

How are you doing now?

(0) 讚！ | 平原觅雁

Has this problem been solved?

(0) 讚！ | 珉林雨橙

Do you need to provide more than five sets of original data, including wb?

(0) 讚！ | 云来涵育

I have uploaded 5 original images in the WB

(0) 讚！ | 爪爪

Published one article in 21, and another in 23 to continue the research. Submission- feedback- revision- feedback- revision- feedback- revision- acceptance- proof- publication, taking approximately 1 year. Both of my articles went through 3-4 rounds of revisions, with strict requirements on data, including uploading original data, and needing N=5 (additional experiments if N=3). The initial feedback usually takes around 2-3 months (definitely within 3 months), followed by major or minor revisions. I had 3 months for revisions for both articles, with various supplementary experiments. After revisions, there is a high chance that reviewers will have some minor feedback, requiring further modifications. Once passing the reviewers' stage, the editor will review the format, data, and ask for more changes if needed. Several list statements may need to be submitted. After passing all stages, it goes to the associate editor and editor-in-chief, with my second article receiving additional feedback at the editor-in-chief level, leading to an additional month of revisions. Finally, it is accepted for publication. The journal does not charge any publication fees

(0) 讚！ | 爪爪

So, Office, Editorial, under review means it's being reviewed, right?

(0) 讚！ | Beau Camp

Is "Under review" displayed that the submission has not been reviewed yet?

(0) 讚！ | Beau Camp

I took a month and five days off for a major overhaul, and was given three months

(0) 讚！ | 克拉克福斯特

Mine is the same, it's been over a month now and I feel like it hasn't been submitted yet. It's been sitting with the editor, maybe they haven't even looked at it

(0) 讚！ | 克拉克福斯特

How are you doing?

(0) 讚！ | 珉林焕焕

I have had the privilege of publishing an article in this magazine. The requirements were really high, with detailed professional suggestions on experimental design and statistical analysis. However, this article underwent three rounds of revisions, taking approximately a year to complete. Unfortunately, its impact factor has not been very high recently.

(3) 讚！ | yeshoupai

How are you, brother?

(0) 讚！ | 珉林焕焕