Review speed: 2.0 | Submission acceptance rate: 95.0
Experience sharing: Received major revisions in over a month, returned minor revisions in over a week, and then accepted directly after another half month

(0) 讚！ | 九阳凯乐

References order

(0) 讚！ | 北冥景天

How should we proceed from here?

(0) 讚！ | 神古博远

Do you have a template for submissions available for this magazine?

(0) 讚！ | 神古博远

Do you have a template for submissions for this magazine? Should the images be submitted separately?

(0) 讚！ | 神古博远

Me too

(0) 讚！ | Rita Fielding

Has anyone been repeatedly rejected because of the order in which they submitted documents? Please submit your paper in the following order. I have already made the modifications in order, but it has been returned four or five times repeatedly. I keep having to make revisions, and I don't know what the problem is

(0) 讚！ | 秀艳小哥哥

The corresponding author is the overall responsible person for the project, responsible for the funding, design, writing of the article, and ensuring the quality. They are responsible for communication with the journal during submission, peer review, and the entire publishing process

(0) 讚！ | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

The corresponding author of SCI journal papers may not be limited to only one person, and there is no fixed standard for how many there can be. This is because different SCI journals have different policies regarding the number of corresponding authors. For SCI journals that only accept one corresponding author, if the paper lists multiple corresponding authors, the first corresponding author will automatically be selected. If an SCI journal allows for two corresponding authors, then two corresponding authors can be listed. The same applies to other requirements, meaning that the number of corresponding authors listed must comply with the specific policies of the target SCI journal. The first author of an SCI paper is the person who has made the greatest contribution to the experimental work and writing of the paper, and is typically the person whose name appears first in the list of authors. In collaborative work, it is common to have co-first authors. There is no specific rule regarding the number of co-first authors, as it depends on the amount of work, length of the paper, publication guidelines, and recognition by the institution. Generally, a paper can have 2-4 co-first authors

(0) 讚！ | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

What is a corresponding author?

(0) 讚！ | 修然小公主

How many corresponding authors/ first authors can a journal have?

(0) 讚！ | 陶宜三岁啦

I regret my decision to invest in this. I feel anxious after hearing what you said

(0) 讚！ | 西行寺沛雯

It's probably best not to invest

(0) 讚！ | 削月圣哲

Do not submit to those low-scoring magazines

(0) 讚！ | 削月圣哲

This magazine is very strict, is yours a major revision? The review process of this magazine is quite fast. They are just too strict

(0) 讚！ | Broderick Malthus

Deceptive magazines have been plaguing me for months, completely changing the face of my article according to their opinions, only to ultimately reject it. Fellow writers, be cautious when submitting your work

(0) 讚！ | 削月圣哲

No reviewers invited. What does this mean?

(0) 讚！ | Broderick Malthus

The review time for articles in this magazine is longer than that for case reports and anatomical studies

(0) 讚！ | Broderick Malthus

How long does the review process for this magazine usually take?

(0) 讚！ | Broderick Malthus

What plagiarism detection software do you guys use when submitting articles?

(0) 讚！ | Broderick Malthus

Review Speed: 1.0 | Submission Acceptance Rate: 50.0
Experience sharing: A highly efficient journal. The clinical case analysis was submitted and received the first review within a month, but encountered a reviewer who was very rigorous but did not provide all opinions at once, raising over 40 questions and suggestions for revisions in four rounds of review. The article went through 5 revisions before being accepted. However, from submission to acceptance, it only took 3 months in total, showing the journal's high efficiency

(0) 讚！ | 飞月天悦

Review speed: 12.0 | Submission success rate: 25.0
Experience sharing: The requirements of the journal are relatively high. The initial review takes two and a half months, followed by one month for revisions. The second review takes two months for minor revisions, with an acceptance period of one and a half months after revisions are submitted

(0) 讚！ | Jamie Nancy

The review process was very fast for a case study. From submission to publication was one month.

(0) 讚！ | maodanr7@126.com

Review speed: 3.0 | Submission acceptance rate: 25.0
Sharing of experience: Maybe because I submitted a case literature review, the review process was very quick. They basically accepted it within a week and then contacted me online 2-4 weeks later for publication. I plan to submit an original article soon and will provide a review once I have a result. There are quite a few Chinese people publishing articles in this journal, and the review process is generally quick, and the editors are very polite

(0) 讚！ | 明冠岚翠

Review Speed: 6.0 Experience Sharing: Research Direction: Neurosurgery Clinical Anatomy
I submitted a neurosurgery clinical anatomy article which was reviewed in half a month, with minor revisions. After submitting the revisions, it was reviewed again in half a month and accepted a week later. This journal seems to welcome articles on surgical skull base anatomy

(0) 讚！ | 五轮博达