under peer review

(0) 讚！ | 书生凯凯

How long does it usually take for a decision to be notified?

(0) 讚！ | iko

Is there no hope without submitting for review and having decision pending?

(0) 讚！ | 北陆雪梦

Returned for a major overhaul after 2 months, repaired once again, with a moderate speed but slightly slow

(0) 讚！ | Science-AD

I would like to ask, has it been submitted for final review?

(0) 讚！ | 通幽如雪

Can I ask if it has been submitted for review?

(0) 讚！ | 通幽如雪

Hello, may I ask if the status changes back to "with editorial consideration" after "under peer review", and then after 11 days it changes back to "under peer review", does this mean a new reviewer has been sought?

(0) 讚！ | 平原海荣

Hello, may I ask how long it takes for the review process? I have been under editorial consideration for one month now

(0) 讚！ | 平原海荣

Could you please confirm whether the status displayed in the submission system is "Under Editorial consideration" or "under review"?

(0) 讚！ | 平原海荣

I have never encountered a decision pending situation, or perhaps I just haven't noticed

(0) 讚！ | Irma Rusk

Will there be a decision pending before submission?

(0) 讚！ | 明冠和璧

How are you proceeding? Have you submitted for approval?

(0) 讚！ | 明冠和璧

Review Speed: 1.0 Experience sharing: Updated. Submitted on 3.28; sent for review on 4.18; received comments on 5.13, major revisions, 2 reviewers; given 40 days for revisions, requested 1 week extension; revised on 6.26; comments received on 7.6, reviewer 2 raised new issues, second round of revisions, given 40 days for revisions, requested 1 month extension; revised on 9.18; accepted on 9.20! Overall, the journal has a very high efficiency and values the innovation of articles rather than just data accumulation. During the revision process, was also asked to streamline the content of the article, haha, really like this journal

(0) 讚！ | Irma Rusk

What's next after the submission? My application is pending decision

(0) 讚！ | Magee Maugham

What happened to the original poster later? How long did this "Under Editorial consideration" status last?

(0) 讚！ | yyyya

Will the money submitted for brain be processed through Decision pending?

(0) 讚！ | 北海白兰

Journal review speed: 4.0 | Submission hit rate: 5.0 Emphasized research direction: translational neurology; stroke Experience sharing: It takes a really long time, comparable to neurology! Round 1 12-May-2022 Submitted 11-Jul-2022 Decisioned (Major Revision) 3 reviewers with comments Round 2 30-Sep-2022 Submitted 21-Oct-2022 Decisioned (Rejection and Resubmission) 1 endorsed, 2 reviewers with comments Round 3 17-Feb-2023 Submitted 13-Mar-2023 Decisioned (Major Revision) 2 new reviewers with comments Round 4 17-Apr-2023 Submitted 8-May-2023 Decisioned (Major Revision) 1 endorsed, 1 new reviewer with comments Round 5 01-Jun-2023 Submitted 18-Jun-2023 Accepted

(0) 讚！ | 龙鳞彦杰

Review Speed: 1.0 | Submission Hit Rate: 5.0
Focus on research direction: Neuroscience
Experience sharing: The paper was sent out for review 10 days after submission, with revisions based on reviewers' comments one month later. After three months of revisions, back and forth three times, the paper was finally accepted, taking half a year in total. In summary: We submitted a paper on a certain neurodegenerative disease, using various animal models and in vitro experiments. Revisions required clinical translational evidence, taking several months, and clinical experiments were added before acceptance. Thus, without clinical translational evidence, it is difficult to be published in neurology journals. For this reason, the same paper was rejected by Science. Overall, the experience was challenging, comparable to publishing in Neuron, and more focused on neurology and medicine

(0) 讚！ | 东海平雅

The text translates to:

"Submitted for external review 10 days later, revised based on the feedback received after one month. After 3 months of further modifications, there were 3 rounds of revisions back and forth, and finally accepted, taking a total of half a year.
Summary: Our paper is about a neurodegenerative disease, using various animal models and in vitro experiments. The revisions required clinical translational evidence, which took several months. Clinical experiments were added to supplement the study, and it was finally accepted. Therefore, it is difficult to conduct pure basic research in the brain without clinical translational evidence. For this reason, the same paper was rejected by Science."

(0) 讚！ | Runbashi

Hello! My submission has been with the editor for 14 days now. What should I expect based on experience?

(0) 讚！ | Aaron Saxton

Already invested and hired oneline.

(0) 讚！ | MJZhu

It might be soon

(0) 讚！ | Irma Rusk

Submitted to Brain twice, both times took 3 weeks for review. The first review took 2 months, during which I saw the journal status change several times, possibly due to re-inviting reviewers, which extended the review time. The second review only took 3 weeks, very fast speed

(0) 讚！ | Irma Rusk

Submitted to Brain twice, both times were reviewed in three weeks. The first submission took two months for review, during which the review status changed, possibly because a new reviewer was appointed, thus extending the review time. The second review took three weeks, very fast

(0) 讚！ | Irma Rusk

How long has your "under editorial consideration" status been going on? Mine has been for one month now

(0) 讚！ | 碧水莹雪