Have you been waiting for a year? Is there any progress now?

(0) 讚！ | 天际天硕

Four reviewers agreed in total, but only feedback from two reviewers came back in the end. The editor requested revisions on September 27th, giving a 14-day deadline. One reviewer raised 25 questions (a very good reviewer, gently pointing out the shortcomings of the article), while another reviewer only evaluated the data ethics. Due to a heavy workload, the author couldn't meet the 14-day deadline and requested a 10-day extension via email. Finally, the revised article was submitted on October 20th, underwent technical review, and as of October 24th, it is currently in the hands of the editor with the next steps unknown.

(0) 讚！ | 缱绻他的蓝瞳

I have been waiting for almost eight months, and it still shows "Under Review" in the system.

(0) 讚！ | 东海寄春

How are things now, my friend?

(0) 讚！ | 鹏

It's so annoying, it's been over three months and I still haven't found an editor.. What should I do ?

(0) 讚！ | 鹏

I only have this sentence. News about your peer review process: The editor has invited more than 10 reviewers. Does it mean that no reviewers have accepted the review?

(0) 讚！ | 东海寄春

It's so difficult, I am already almost eight months pregnant.

(0) 讚！ | 东海寄春

Has the status changed? I have been stuck in this state for a long time as well.

(0) 讚！ | 东海寄春

How do you follow up on submissions? I have sent many emails but have not received any replies.

(0) 讚！ | George Sophy

It's good, which means it has passed the preliminary submission check.

(0) 讚！ | Adelaide Lawson

Brothers, what step are we at now?

(0) 讚！ | 长安醉柳

Brother, can you explain what state this is?

(0) 讚！ | 长安醉柳

Brother, take a look at what my situation is.

(0) 讚！ | 长安醉柳

Great comments, you need to log in to view.

(0) 讚！ | 长安醉柳

Every year, whenever we ask for an update, they always say they are waiting on the final review. The responses we receive have never been changed.

(0) 讚！ | 惠丽少女

About 2 weeks

(0) 讚！ | 惠丽少女

Be cautious in your investment. Be cautious in your investment. Be cautious in your investment. Be cautious in your investment. Be cautious in your investment.

(0) 讚！ | 惠丽少女

This magazine is too slow... How long has your editor invited? I'm still stuck here.

(0) 讚！ | 南川元香

Stuck at this step as well, wondering how much longer this process will take?

(0) 讚！ | 小香冬吖

The magazine has a fast review process, providing a first review result four weeks after submission, with a two-week revision period. After the revision, acceptance is granted six weeks later. The entire cycle takes three months.

(0) 讚！ | 奔跑的蜗牛在奔跑

How long does it take from assigning to editors to inviting reviewers? And how long does it take for reviewers to accept the invitation?

(0) 讚！ | 云居水彤

There are 6 reviewer(s) that have accepted to review your manuscript. Will they all review it? How long does the review process usually take?? Nervous jittering.

(0) 讚！ | 两仪宛秋

The magazine editors are irresponsible, so it is advisable for those in a rush to graduate to be cautious when submitting their work.

Submitted in early March 2024, a few days later the format was modified, and on the same day it was revised and assigned to an editor. It took 5 months to be assigned, during which three reminder emails were sent, but there was no response.

In early August 2024, the assignment to an editor was successful, but after inviting reviewers, two months passed without any response from them.

(0) 讚！ | qslark

Reviewer speed: 6.0 | Submission hit rate: 50.0 Emphasis on research direction: obesity; Public health experience sharing: Submitted on September 19, failed the first technical review, resubmitted after the 20th. Checked today (October 7), the editor has invited more than 10 reviewers. There are 5 reviewers that have accepted to review your manuscript. Will there be so many reviewers? If someone declines to review, will it be over?

(0) 讚！ | 两仪宛秋

The magazine, which is completely rotten, has been assigning editors for three months after submission. The day after urging for submission, they directly sent an email saying "not within the scope of the journal" and rejected it. It would have been better if they had rejected it earlier, wasting so much time for the submitter!

(1) 讚！ | 无无