I am already 16 months old

(0) 讚！ | withier

Have you revised it, OP? Or did you just get rejected directly after 7 months of review?

(0) 讚！ | withier

Keep going

(0) 讚！ | whyen

Hang in there.

###

(0) 讚！ | whyen

Finally published online!

(0) 讚！ | whyen

Seven months later, rejected!!!!!!!

(0) 讚！ | 盈心素月

In the ninth month after submission, it has been reviewed four times and underwent major revisions four times. The reviewers have agreed to accept it, but the editor has found a third reviewer. I just can't understand. Now they are not responding to my reminders and I am thinking about withdrawing the submission

(0) 讚！ | zibozhou

My paper has been under review for nine months, with four rounds of revisions. Originally, two reviewers accepted the paper after the second round of revisions. However, the editor then brought in a third reviewer. I don't understand this strange behavior. I have now been asked to submit revisions twice, but there has been no response

(0) 讚！ | zibozhou

This magazine is just too trashy, the review period is not guaranteed at all. It's been a year, and despite numerous reminders, there has been no response. If I receive their review in the future, I will definitely delay it as much as possible!

(2) 讚！ | ssagw

Review speed: 24.0 | Submission success rate: 50.0
Experience sharing: This journal has been terrible recently, reminders have never received a reply, too too slow!!

(0) 讚！ | Ronald Boswell

Hahaha, it's been 15 months and it's still in peer review

(1) 讚！ | withier

After the external audit, I was asked to revise the document, but there were no review comments in the email sent by the editor. What should I do?

(0) 讚！ | 碧水文山

It has been 8 months since I submitted my work, but there has been no response

(1) 讚！ | zibozhou

Submitted in October 2023, received reviewer comments one month later, revised and resubmitted. Four months later, both reviewers approved publication of the second round of reviewer comments, and the editor found a third reviewer. The third reviewer provided modification suggestions, which were implemented and resubmitted. Two months later, received the third round of reviewer comments, revised again, and by May 2024, there was still no result

(1) 讚！ | zibozhou

2.23 submit
2.26 under review
4.1 Both reviewers recommend minor revisions
4.4 submit
4.5 under review
4.15 accept
Overall the process was quite speedy and smooth

(0) 讚！ | Xiyue Wang

How is upstairs now? I'm exhausted from waiting

(0) 讚！ | withier

My paper has been under technical review for three months. I am waiting for the editor's notification. This journal is very slow to start

(1) 讚！ | nihaojiangnan

Just wait, it's in the hands of the editor

(1) 讚！ | WFRGWETG

Lasted for 10 months, with 3 rounds of revisions, the editorial department quickly completed each format check. The opinions from the reviewers were very good, there were three of them. The main delay was due to the academic editor's slow response, which wasted at least 4 months, but the manuscript was finally accepted

(0) 讚！ | WFRGWETG

Has everyone always been in this state? 35 days, still like this after technical checks. Does anyone know what it means?

(0) 讚！ | shih

+1, submitted in February 23, and returned revised in November, but there has been no progress since then... it's dried up

(0) 讚！ | withier

Have you received any update, OP? It's been over a week since my pre-approval and I still haven't heard anything. It still shows "ready to assign" status...and now it's showing "peer review" as well

(0) 讚！ | 13

It has been almost a year since I submitted in April 2023, and there has been no news. I can't even withdraw my submission

(0) 讚！ | dd

Ready to be assigned to an editor   What's going on with this, it's been quiet

(0) 讚！ | dd

2.5 Request revision
2.14 Revision submitted
2.18 Minor revision (Pre-accept)
2.18 Revision submitted
2.20 Accept
This journal requires technical review for each submission. Even minor issues will be returned for you to revise, causing a delay of one day. Please be careful (especially, do not mark changes in the attached content during modifications, just make direct edits, otherwise you will be asked to revise

(1) 讚！ | 猪猪Pig