It's about 7 days, but it's not too fixed. I've also seen some people say they waited for a few weeks.

(0) 讚！ | Adelaide Lawson

Hello, how many days does it usually take for him to edit this magazine?

(0) 讚！ | 星辰小娘子

Submitted in early May, the editor received it within a week. I thought BMC wouldn't be as slow as rumored, but it wasn't until the end of August that the review process began. It wasn't until mid-September that the first reviewer appeared. It looks like the rumors were true. I suspect that once the magazine took over, they forgot about it and only reluctantly sent it for review without directly rejecting it. Sigh.

(0) 讚！ | 筒学长

Friendly editing, submissions accepted until March 3rd.

(0) 讚！ | 应龙冰珍

Which direction, frontiers in neurology has accepted it

(0) 讚！ | 雾都宇轩

How did this journal, after finishing the technical review, go straight to peer review?

(0) 讚！ | 南川立轩

I really can't believe it. After waiting for 3 months for feedback from 4 reviewers, responding to each one, 2 months later reviewers 1 and 2 gave no issues, reviewer 3 suggested integrating the response content into the article, and reviewer 4 seemed to directly reject the paper. The editor asked for major revisions, and after adding experimental results and making revisions, it took another month to receive the rejection letter from reviewer 4, who used a rejection template out of nowhere, and even got the journal name wrong ([the Journal Name]). After over half a year of submission time, I really feel like crying

(1) 讚！ | 如影以菡

Review Speed: 6.0 | Submission Acceptance Rate: 25.0 Experience Sharing: Ahhhhh

(0) 讚！ | 半月佑运

Submission success rate: 25.0 Experience sharing: healthy and happy

(0) 讚！ | 半月佑运

How are you doing now?

(0) 讚！ | 六合三诗

How long did you finally wait, is it the editor's decision or evaluation?

(0) 讚！ | 擒龙语寒

How much is the layout fee?

(0) 讚！ | 东风歌阑

My submission was rejected behind me. I have revised it and resubmitted it, taking it seriously for the first time submitter. The revised manuscript has now been submitted to Frontiers in Neurology, and is currently under external review. Waiting for a response

(0) 讚！ | 是强圉吖

Submitted in mid-October of the 22nd year, stuck in "initial technical check" for a month and a half, and in early December, they notified me that it was "out of scope" and asked me to submit to another journal... If they had taken a few minutes to glance at it during this time, they wouldn't have wasted the author's time by only realizing it didn't belong to their journal after such a long period.

(1) 讚！ | Baytars

I was under review for about 50 days at that time, and then I waited for 4 months and was rejected because there were no reviewers

(0) 讚！ | Hobart Hobson

I have been feeling overwhelmed for over two months

(0) 讚！ | 仲夏宏峻

It has been over two months, and we are still in Editorial Assessment. Is it still necessary to wait?

(0) 讚！ | 仲夏宏峻

Editorial Assessment has been two months, seeing that everyone is like this, I have decided to wait a little longer

(0) 讚！ | 神古景苑

It has been 74 days, grass.

(0) 讚！ | ruiruiruirui

It has been 68 days, damn it.

(0) 讚！ | ruiruiruirui

Review speed: 6.0 | Submission hit rate: 75.0 Research focus: neuroexperience sharing: really exhausted. Submitted on 7/4, minor revisions requested on 9/25, and resubmitted afterwards. It's been 60 days since the minor revisions and there has been no progress. The last three reminders were ignored, it's like dealing with a dead person. The last response was waiting for the final evaluation by the editor-in-chief, but they have already started recruiting. It's so frustrating

(0) 讚！ | 冬马云天

56 days after the minor revision, they haven't contacted me anymore. At first, they replied to my reminders and said they were waiting for the final decision from the editor-in-chief. But recently, they didn't even reply to my reminders, not even with a template response... My child is still waiting to find a job, I'm really fed up! What are they procrastinating for!?

(18) 讚！ | ruiruiruirui

Review Speed: 1.0 | Submission Acceptance Rate: 50.0
Experience Sharing: Submitted for revision less than two months ago, with two reviewers. One reviewer recommended acceptance, while the other suggested revisions. After resubmitting and discussing, the article was accepted in less than two weeks

(0) 讚！ | 孤云建本

Waited for two months, started looking for ae, under review turned into reviews received after 2 weeks. Now another two weeks, waiting for the associate editor to decide on rejection or minor or major revisions. It's been so long, it's likely to be major revisions if rejected, which should be quick, and minor revisions should not take this long

(0) 讚！ | 是强圉吖

It took two months to find a deputy editor, who is a prominent scientist in Japan publishing a lot of papers in scientific journals. The status changed to "under review" and then to "reviews received" two weeks later. Now, after waiting for 12 days, we are still waiting for the deputy editor's decision on major revisions, minor revisions, or rejection. It is likely to be major revisions, and the latter two periods will be relatively short

(0) 讚！ | 是强圉吖