Similar experiences, I don't know how it is now

(0) 讚！ | simon

Passed the technical review, it's been more than 4 months

(0) 讚！ | simon

I am the same as the host, it has been 4 months. Last year, the comments were quite fast

(0) 讚！ | simon

I am in the same situation as you. How is your article coming along?

(0) 讚！ | xpf199

I am in the same situation as you. How is your manuscript going now?

(0) 讚！ | xpf199

In early December 23rd, the peer review is underway, and it now shows that editors' decisions may take several weeks as they may consult peer reviewers. Does anyone know what this means? I have been following the website all along, and it clearly shows invitations to reviewers, but I haven't seen any reviewers agreeing to review. Does the system not show this? Is it necessary to write an email to follow up?

(1) 讚！ | 独孤荷紫

Review speed: 24.0 | Submission hit rate: 25.0
Sharing experience: Submitted on 23-11-22, still waiting for editor invitation, sent reminder emails several times but only received responses saying the invitation is still pending. Be cautious when submitting in a hurry

(1) 讚！ | Hogan Nehemiah

The submitted article was a case report, which took three and a half months for the first peer review. After receiving comments for revisions, the second review took 20 days. One of the three reviewers did not agree with the revisions, while the other two were satisfied with them. Surprisingly, the article was rejected without giving the authors a chance for further revisions. Sometimes, even reminder emails did not receive responses. Think carefully before submitting your work!

(0) 讚！ | 震雷雪山

The technical review was very fast, and we received a response within almost two days

(0) 讚！ | 震雷雪山

Review speed: 2.0
Emphasis on research direction: Non-tumor
Experience sharing: 2 months for review, returned after 2 weeks of minor revisions, unprofessional reviewers, did not understand Mendelian randomization and reviewed haphazardly, rejected after 2 months of review, total of 4 months, exercise caution with similar studies

(0) 讚！ | 猫巷少女乙巳

Review Speed: 6.0 Experience Sharing: It's been almost 4 months already, speechless

(1) 讚！ | Adam Blake

Is there anywhere else that I can send the pure raw material trust?

(0) 讚！ | 赫莫萨西尼尔

Research Focus: Tumor Molecular Epidemiology Experience Sharing: It has been 2 months, still Editors invited, any hope, has anyone shared the experience of submitting a manuscript from a senior researcher?

(0) 讚！ | 奉天善静

It's too slow, I can't stand it any longer. I can't find the reviewer

(0) 讚！ | Adam Blake

Changed the editor midway, which affected the speed of finding reviewers. Later, due to other matters, it was not managed, but after finding reviewers, the processing speed was very fast. The revised second review was accepted and published within 2 weeks

(0) 讚！ | sharkbaozi

Review speed: 6.0 | Submission hit rate: 50.0. Emphasized research direction: Bioinformatics + Wet lab validation; Non-tumor experience sharing: Longer review time, over half a year

(1) 讚！ | Rosemary Ella

Any news?

(0) 讚！ | 奉天善静

It has been more than 2 months since the manuscript was submitted, but there has been no word from them yet

(0) 讚！ | 一条小竹韵

Submission received, 14 May 2023
Submission under peer review, 19 May 2023
Amendment received, 21 Sep 2023
Revision received, 16 Sep 2023
Submission accepted, 15 Oct 2023

(1) 讚！ | Dr-Wey

What are you talking about?

(0) 讚！ | 幽香丙寅

It has been 4 months since I submitted my paper, and it has been in peer review all this time. I wonder if it has been sent out for review yet

(0) 讚！ | kiki

Have you voted?

(0) 讚！ | 小野寺夏珍

My technical review is still underway for 9 working days

(0) 讚！ | 一条小竹韵

How long does a technical review typically take? It's been 7 working days for mine

(0) 讚！ | 一条小竹韵

Review speed: 6.0 | Submission acceptance rate: 50.0
Experience sharing: One word, slow

(0) 讚！ | 芷蝶三岁啦