Excuse me, how long is the review period, it has been almost 3 months and still no response

(0) 讚！ | 胖丁97

May I ask how long the review period is, senior? It's been almost 3 months and there's still no feedback

(0) 讚！ | 胖丁97

9.25 submitted
9.28 under review
10.4 under review
10.15 revision by one reviewer
10.20 revised
10.30 under review
11.09 under review
11.13 accepted
Only one reviewer was found, but the reviewer was very responsible, read it very carefully, and the problems and suggestions were very helpful for improving the quality of the manuscript. Overall, it's pretty good

(0) 讚！ | han涵

The levels of all three journals in the Acta series are not low, but in order to control quality, the number of articles accepted in a year is limited too strictly. In this era of crazy internal competition in materials science, it is also a good operational direction to open a journal to absorb quality transferred articles that were not able to be accepted by the three main journals for various reasons. In my opinion, this new journal can also keep up with the three big brothers and become a good journal

(1) 讚！ | mong

Is this a new journal? Why can't I find the Chinese Academy of Sciences classification?

(0) 讚！ | Zseven

I previously used real-time impact factor to calculate, and the result is approximately between 2.5 and 3.

(0) 讚！ | 薛定谔的布偶猫

The conversion rate is fast, but it seems that the impact factor will not be high, and there is also a significant difference in article quality.

(0) 讚！ | RaymondDai

Same question, I feel that the impact factor just released should be around 2, not exceeding 3.

(0) 讚！ | forstudy

What will be the impact factor in 2023, and approximately how high can it be?

(0) 讚！ | 贾斯丁

I first submitted to the journal ACTA Materialia, and then transferred to Materialia. Overall, I feel the speed is good, and I hope for smooth development in the future.

(0) 讚！ | xjx