The invitation to the editor started on 23-12-22, but it was not until April 12, 24 that they were finally brought on board. Now the reviewers are in the process, and it has been over a month since we last heard any updates. The entire process has been almost 6 months now, and we are getting frustrated

(0) 讚！ | lika

Review speed: 12.0
Emphasis research direction: imaging; cardiovascular
Sharing experience: Delayed for a year with no response. Just received review comments recently, but didn't receive any related emails in my inbox, and can't find it in the submission system... TMD, this is really garbage

(0) 讚！ | 风满依童

Have you found it, brother? They dragged me for almost a year, gave me feedback on the manuscript, I didn't receive it in the email, and I can't find it in the system. I have nowhere to send a reminder

(0) 讚！ | 风满依童

Does it take more than a year to get results, and still inexplicably rejected?

(0) 讚！ | Angela Toby

I don't know if it's because of the approaching update of the IF, there are clearly more rejections recently, but I feel something is wrong lately. This is an article I reviewed before, about three or four months ago, I can't remember specifics, anyway a long time ago, to be honest, the article is average, but after all, the quality of the article needs to be combined with the journal's IF, otherwise it's playing a trick; the data is not very innovative, but it has its own verification, in my opinion it still matches this IF, so I made some revisions. Today I saw the final decision, in fact, all three reviewers suggested revisions, and the most common criticism was lack of innovation. But in the case of all reviewers agreeing that it can be accepted after modifications... the editor rejected it... Why did I bother to submit it for review. Therefore... be cautious

(1) 讚！ | 墨鱼头

Review speed: 24.0 | Submission acceptance rate: 5.0
Experience sharing: After two rounds of review post submission, the review expert approved it. However, more than a year later, the editor rejected it. Damn it

(0) 讚！ | 桃花运菱

Be careful when submitting your work to this journal, it is a huge pit. Submitted on August 26, 2023, received technical check on September 19, revised on September 20, passed technical check on September 21, then under peer review, remained in this status until March 4 when the revision comments were given. During this period, I sent 4 reminder emails, the first reminder on December 5 received a reply on the 7th saying they couldn't find reviewers or editors for my submission, but with a good attitude, so I waited for some time. On the 20th still no news, so I wrote to withdraw the submission, got a reply on the 21st saying to give them another week. Sent another reminder on January 9, they replied still waiting for the final report. The 4th reminder on February 14, still waiting for the final report. Finally received revision comments for minor changes on March 4, resubmitted on March 19, under peer review again on the 21st, then rejected on April 29!!! The reviewers didn't have major issues but it was rejected by the editor!! Really infuriating

(1) 讚！ | 石榴baby

Submission on 23-8-29, Typo

(1) 讚！ | 墨鱼头

Submitted on 29th September 2023, entered peer review on 17th September 2023, received comments from 5 reviewers at the end of February 2024, revised on 9th March 2024, received a private message from one of the reviewers on 15th March 2024 asking for money (claiming to charge for polishing, but the manuscript was actually polished by an editing agency found to be the director of a hospital in Henan, contacted the journal on the same day), received rejection notice on 15th April 2024 (the director mentioned language issues, and despite already having 5 reviewers, invited a 6th reviewer and raised several small issues, editor rejected based on overall feedback). Appeal unsuccessful.. To be honest, rejection doesn't matter to me, as I am not a first author, but pointing out when there is clear evidence of reviewers violating academic ethics.. It's impressive that the editor can turn a blind eye and continue to let them review; inviting a new reviewer after addressing all issues raised by the 5 reviewers is quite a move

(1) 讚！ | 墨鱼头

Submitted in October 23rd, I received the request for revision yesterday, exactly half a year later! Good luck!

(0) 讚！ | 榆木脑袋

I wish I had seen the message from the OP earlier. It has been almost 3 months for me too and there has been no progress. My manuscript is still in Peer review status and I have no idea what's going on. Have you heard any news about your submission?

(1) 讚！ | 永远18

**
Do not submit at all. It has been a full three months since submission, and we haven't even found the responsible editor, let alone sent it for review. There is no responsibility at all.

**

(0) 讚！ | lika

Could you please translate the following passage into English and Japanese, with the titles ":" and ":" respectively?

(0) 讚！ | 千花若芳

Review speed: 2.0 | Submission hit rate: 50.0
Research focus: Obesity; miRNA; Experience sharing on echocardiography: 2023.4.4 submitted, received minor revision in early June 2023, then the editor asked for revisions two or three times. Entered peer review on June 30, 2023.8.27 because one reviewer could not be contacted, another reviewer was assigned for major revisions, asked very high-level questions, and the edits left me overwhelmed. Revised on September 6, 2023, and accepted by the editor on September 7, who was very responsible and patiently responded to many prompts for status updates. The reviewers were very professional and asked challenging questions, but I also learned a lot. The speed was a bit slow, so if you are in a rush to graduate, it could be a bit overwhelming

(0) 讚！ | 烨华君

Could you please let me know your submission website link? I'm afraid I might have submitted it to the wrong system. Thank you very much

(0) 讚！ | 日月俊拔

Research focus: Cardiovascular. Sharing experiences: Would you like to accept a review?

(0) 讚！ | Debby Barrett

And then what happened?

(0) 讚！ | 代桃姑娘

Are you specializing in cardiology or echocardiography?

(0) 讚！ | 稻妻素真

Do you need the original data besides providing typical images?

(0) 讚！ | 稻妻素真

It is 2480 dollars

(0) 讚！ | 孤云绮思

Is it resolved now? I am also facing the same issue

(0) 讚！ | 龙象志勇

Why do I have animal ethics, and the animal ethics and their guidelines template are the same, the editing technical review still cannot pass

(0) 讚！ | 暴风涵菱

Why did my animal ethics pass, with an animal ethics number and statement, but still fail technical review? The editor keeps asking me to provide a statement

(0) 讚！ | 暴风涵菱

Where is the progress of the submissions for this magazine? I couldn't find it in the submission system. I have to log in with my 0RID account, but there is no message and it says my password is incorrect, even though I haven't changed it. Also, why does the submission system prompt me to either re-enter the submission page or enter my email address to receive a new password? I changed the submission password, so let me enter a new password

(0) 讚！ | 中原梓瑶

Hello, I wanted to ask how long it took for your article to be accepted from submission, I have also sent a few reminder emails, it's been 2 months now and there has been no response

(0) 讚！ | 中原梓瑶