期刊簡介 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
期刊名稱 | BIOTECHNOLOGY LETTERS LetPub Score 5.7
50 ratings
Rate
Reputation 6.5 Influence 4.2 Speed 9.4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
期刊簡稱 | BIOTECHNOL LETT | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
ISSN | 0141-5492 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
E-ISSN | 1573-6776 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
h-index | 92 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
CiteScore |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
自引率 (2023-2024) | 5.00%自引率趨勢 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
掲載範囲 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
官方網站 | https://www.springer.com/10529 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
在線稿件提交 | https://www.editorialmanager.com/bile/ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
開放訪問 | No | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
出版商 | Springer Netherlands | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
主題領域 | 工程技术 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
出版國/地區 | NETHERLANDS | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
發行頻率 | 月2回刊行 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
創刊年 | 1979 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
每年文章數 | 106每年文章數趨勢 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
黃金OA百分比 | 9.66% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Web of Science 四分位 ( 2023-2024) | WOS Quartile: Q3
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
索引 (SCI or SCIE) | Science Citation Index Science Citation Index Expanded | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
鏈接到PubMed Central (PMC) | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=0141-5492%5BISSN%5D | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
平均審稿時間 * | 來自出版商的數據: 來自作者的數據: About 1.0 month(s) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
競爭力 * | 來自作者的數據: 42% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
參考鏈接 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
*所有的審稿過程指標,如接受率和審稿速度,僅限於用戶提交的稿件。因此,這些指標可能無法準確反映期刊的競爭力或速度。 |
|
|
首頁 上一頁 1 2 下一頁 末頁 (頁 | |
[BIOTECHNOLOGY LETTERS] 的評論 | 撰寫評論 |
作者: 猪猪读博士 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2024-04-11 11:20:45 評論於 Is there any layout fee?(0) 讚! | 猪猪读博士 |
作者: YL@YL 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2023-03-03 11:09:00 評論於 Hello, may I ask how long it took from submission to acceptance for you? I submitted mine half a month ago and it changed from "Editor Assigned" to "Reviewers Assigned." Does this mean it has been sent for external review?(0) 讚! | YL@YL |
作者: hciavgugv ues 領域: 生物学 審稿時間: 1.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2022-11-11 16:32:11 評論於 August 2022. One month after investment, minor adjustments will be made and acceptance will be confirmed within one week after the modifications.(0) 讚! | hciavgugv ues |
作者: 幽若 領域: 生物学 審稿時間: 4.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2021-02-21 11:38:52 評論於 Hello, may I ask if your article has been accepted? How long did the review process take?(0) 讚! | 幽若 |
作者: 不爱写论文 領域: 生物 審稿時間: 1.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2020-08-31 21:22:29 評論於 This journal requires a checklist when submitting revised manuscript. It is said that it can be found on the website, but I can’t find it. Can anyone provide it? Thanks! (0) 讚! | 不爱写论文 |
作者: 努力活着yang 領域: 生物 審稿時間: 2.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2020-05-25 11:17:11 評論於 2 days after submission, it became under review, and it took almost a month before it became awaiting editor’s decision. I immediately got worried. Is it possible because of the epidemic? After about 1 week, it became under review again, and it has been almost 2 months until now. Looking forward to being accepted. (0) 讚! | 努力活着yang |
作者: 科研小厮 領域: 农林科学 審稿時間: 3.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2019-05-29 09:18:02 評論於 It's been nearly three months, and the status is still under review, which is not the same as everyone's feedback. After submitting in two or three days, it changed to editor assign reviewer from production, and then under review for nearly three months. I don’t know what the situation is. Do I need to send an email to ask editor? (3) 讚! | 科研小厮 |
作者: 914735630@qq.com 領域: 化学科学 審稿時間: 1.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2017-07-31 09:24:03 評論於 The article has been received, saying that it is 2-3 weeks online, but now it has been more than a month, no news, I don't know what happened, I dare not send an email to ask the editor.(2) 讚! | 914735630@qq.com |
作者: 西瓜烤红薯 領域: 化学科学 審稿時間: 1.0 month(s) 結果: 直接被接受 撰寫評論 |
2017-06-22 13:17:42 評論於 submitted for 2 weeks and received it directly.Happy(3) 讚! | 西瓜烤红薯 |
作者: bz 領域: 化学科学 審稿時間: 1.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2015-08-10 09:37:06 評論於 The review speed is very fast, and the results are fed back in 3 weeks.The journal has a high standard of language and writing.After I was repaired, I was re-repaired. It was edited by the editor-in-chief.Very responsible and responsible for the editor of nice.(3) 讚! | bz |
作者: bz 領域: 化学科学 審稿時間: 1.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2015-08-10 09:36:56 評論於 The review speed is very fast, and the results are fed back in 3 weeks.The journal has a high standard of language and writing.After I was repaired, I was re-repaired. It was edited by the editor-in-chief.Very responsible and responsible for the editor of nice.(0) 讚! | bz |
作者: 匿名 領域: 生命科学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 撰寫評論 |
2013-10-28 16:56:00 評論於 was rejected one month, before the brothers selectd an article, the editor reply similarity is too high, halo(0) 讚! | 匿名 |
作者: 匿名 領域: 生命科学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 撰寫評論 |
2013-09-19 16:17:00 評論於 Select Submission Classifications,,, can not be selected, is empty, dizzyNow!!!(0) 讚! | 匿名 |
作者: 匿名 領域: 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 撰寫評論 |
2013-08-14 17:08:00 評論於 I submitted it in 13.8.12. The journal's submission system is not very useful.But the speed of review is as fast as many people say.13.8.12 Even in the evening, NEW SUBMISSION, 13.8.13 was already assigned by Editor in the morning, but I got the message in the morning of 13.8.14, because the content was too light and was directly rejected..Reject: results too slight*/results too preliminary* is the opinion given by Editor in chief, so it is more informative.We receive m(0) 讚! | 匿名 |
作者: 匿名 領域: 生命科学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 撰寫評論 |
2013-08-03 22:42:00 評論於 In my opinion, this journal is rather easy to get published in – the journal only requires a small amount of innovation. The one-month review period is very reasonable, especially for graduate students who are looking to publish quickly. This is a great SCI journal. I do, however, recommend that all submissions are written in the format requested by the journal and that the language is polished prior to submission. (0) 讚! | 匿名 |
作者: 匿名 領域: 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 撰寫評論 |
2013-07-06 23:00:00 評論於 Just submitted an article today, insecticidal protein microcapsules,,, blessing can be....2 weeks, no information yet..Calm..Nearly 3 weeks of tragedy..It is said that the experiment is incomplete and it is recommended to do biometric tests..Halo, our lab can't do that..(0) 讚! | 匿名 |
作者: 匿名 領域: 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 撰寫評論 |
2013-05-25 18:08:00 評論於 Submitted for 2 months, the efficiency is high, as long as the content is new.The editor is very responsible.(0) 讚! | 匿名 |
作者: 匿名 領域: 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 撰寫評論 |
2013-04-07 13:38:00 評論於 Two weeks after submission, return to review comments(0) 讚! | 匿名 |
作者: 匿名 領域: 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 撰寫評論 |
2013-03-22 11:27:00 評論於 I have been submiting for 20 days, and I have been NEW SUBMISSION.(1) 讚! | 匿名 |
作者: 匿名 領域: 生命科学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 撰寫評論 |
2013-01-30 16:50:00 評論於 Writing in strict accordance with the requirements of the journal before submission, the review is very fast.Be novel, short and fine.(0) 讚! | 匿名 |
作者: 匿名 領域: 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 撰寫評論 |
2013-01-29 22:55:00 評論於 Edit reply: We have removed your submission from our submission queue. Please feel free to contact me should you have any questions.(1) 讚! | 匿名 |
作者: 匿名 領域: 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 撰寫評論 |
2012-11-03 11:08:00 評論於 under review 3 weeks, seeking calm ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~(0) 讚! | 匿名 |
作者: 匿名 領域: 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 撰寫評論 |
2012-08-23 23:53:00 評論於 Please consult, after the revision is submitted, is it in the state of Editor Assigned?How long does it usually give the result(0) 讚! | 匿名 |
作者: 匿名 領域: 審稿時間: 1.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2012-06-12 15:39:00 評論於 as long as the article is innovative, it is quite fast.I have revised comments after 1 week of submission, minor repairs.Be carefully revised according to the reviewer's comments, especially paying attention to the format of the article.Prepare to return the revised comments in these two days, I hope everything goes well~~~:)(0) 讚! | 匿名 |
作者: 匿名 領域: 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 撰寫評論 |
2012-04-21 17:25:00 評論於 Submitted in the previous period, was pitted, rejected after 2 revisions, saying that my last modification did not meet the requirements.Directly rejected, without any detailed reasons.(0) 讚! | 匿名 |
首頁 上一頁 1 2 下一頁 末頁 (頁 |
Contact us