After the formatting review, why did the status change to locked when I resubmitted? Has anyone encountered this situation before? How was it resolved?

(0) 讚！ | 淡如清风

Has anyone recently applied for this? My application has been under review for almost two months and I still don't know if it has been sent for review since submission

(0) 讚！ | dshnature

The three major journals in the environmental field have unexpectedly dropped to such a low impact factor. EST and Water Research have long exceeded 10, while BB is still struggling at around 4... If it weren't for its reputation, it would have fallen to the third zone long ago

(0) 讚！ | Jackie-Wang

In the field's well-established journal, with a good reputation, after two rounds of reviews lasting four months, the paper was finally accepted. The reviewers' comments were helpful, but overall, it was challenging

(16) 讚！ | WilliamzzZ

The preferred journal of the mentor is filled with editors who are considered experienced and respected in the industry. The review process is moderately paced, with responses typically received within two months. The reviews are conducted professionally, with input from two reviewers and the editor.

(4) 讚！ | 极大

Posted on April 5th, 2022, accepted on July 17th, 2022. The reviewer is very responsible, and the review comments are very valuable!

(0) 讚！ | 缘起168

I have been applying for four months. After the first review, it was directly rejected.

(0) 讚！ | 雨落半夏

The submission is a review article, but it has been almost two months now and it is still in the "selecting for review" status. Have you also been in this situation?

(0) 讚！ | yigenaisideren

Students who are in the "selecting for review" status, did you submit an experimental article? Does this journal accept review articles?

(0) 讚！ | 安晴

Fellow students in the "selecting for review" status, did you submit practical articles? Does this journal accept review articles?

(0) 讚！ | 安晴

The text "selecting for review状态我的持续一个月左右" translates to "The selecting for review status lasts for about a month."

(0) 讚！ | 安晴

Yes, about one month.

(0) 讚！ | 安晴

I have been submitting my work for a month now, and it has been in the "Selecting for Review" status. Do you have this stage? How long does it usually last?

(0) 讚！ | yigenaisideren

I submitted it on November 16, 2020. It is currently in the waiting stage for reviewer scores. It has been two months. Does anyone know how long it generally takes for the first review to be completed?

(1) 讚！ | 安晴

What happened after you waited for two months? This is also the case for my submission.

(0) 讚！ | yigenaisideren

It was submitted on July 22, it was firstly “selecting for review”, and then “assigning for review”, and then it changed to “selecting for review”, and this status lasts until now. I am panic, I don’t know what the situation is.

(6) 讚！ | 21LLL23

17-03-27 Submission;17-06-24 Return to the review comments, minor repairs;17-07-12 Accepted.The cycle is longer than I thought.The journal has a small number of articles per year, and the requirements are still quite high.Innovative, experimental results, language.Good luck ~

(2) 讚！ | xiaodanxdz

became the Assigning Editor three days after submitting the manuscript. After two days, the editor-in-chief refused, saying that the manuscript is rich, not the quality of the manuscript, but the publishing space is limited.

(2) 讚！ | Anonymous

good journal, in our school belongs to the top 100.On July 12th, the August 7th overhaul.Returned on September 30, the National Day has come back.quite fast.

(1) 讚！ | 匿名

A week, still in the assigning editors, I don’t know if it’s awkward.I thought about this very quickly, I didn't expect the first step to be so slow.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

has selectd for 3 articles this year, and fortunately, 2 articles were rejected.A revision was sent to the chemosphere. BB is a journal of Willy, the impact factor has not been very high, but the influence in the industry is huge, together with EST, Water research and called the three major ace journals in the environmental field.I personally think that the quality of the article is better than Water research.The editor is very bullish, and there is basically no chance of irrigation. In 2011, there were 12 domestic articles, of which Yu Hanqing’s laboratory accounted for 4 articles.The review speed is very fast. Generally, the editor should have 7-14 days for the first trial and 14 days for the external trial.Sending these articles is also a good example of the natural fund that failed this year. I will apply again next year...

(3) 讚！ | 匿名

is a very good journal, and it is faster regardless of whether it is received or rejected.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

was a half-monthly journal, and now it has been published in a monthly journal. It was directly edited by the editor.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

In the past two years, many metabolic engineering big cows have alreadyTransferring the direction of submission, basically not publishing articles on BB, all turned to ME to submit the manuscript...I have to ask Mr. Zhong to pay attention to this trend...

(1) 讚！ | 匿名

The first time I submitted to this journal, I felt that the requirements for publication were quite strict. The reviews were completed within 1 month; there were three peer reviewers. Two reviewers recommended acceptance pending minor revisions, while the other reviewer suggested major revision. Overall, it was not a terrible experience but the editor was extremely slow to respond to any inquiries. After our manuscript was accepted, it was selected for a video abstract by the editorial department. Unfortunately, because there was no indication of this in advance, we could not complete the video abstract in the amount of time allotted by the journal. If you submit to this journal, be prepared for a video abstract request (apparently this is common).

(0) 讚！ | 匿名