July 9th: Submission
August 9th to present: Under Review

(0) 讚！ | luyuntao

May I ask how long it will take for the proof to be online?

(0) 讚！ | Tingjue Wang

This journal is currently the best journal I have ever submitted to. As long as the article is not too bad, they will send it for review and provide feedback for revisions. Both reviewers and editors can point out issues in the paper. It was rejected and resubmitted once, underwent major revisions once, and minor revisions once before being accepted. The quality of the article has greatly improved. The paper has been proofread but I don't know when it will be available online.

(0) 讚！ | Tingjue Wang

Thank you for your reply. It should be the situation you mentioned. Just received the feedback for revision today, it's a major overhaul ??. There are three reviewers in total, the first one gave fewer comments, the second one gave more comments and they were sharper; the third one also gave some comments, but fewer compared to the second one.

(0) 讚！ | dyt

I have seen several people asking about submission templates. I have submitted to this journal several times and have found that there is no template available, and most other journals also do not provide templates. First-time submitters must absolutely read the Guide for Authors carefully, as it contains important formatting requirements and other instructions. By combining the Guide for Authors with the format of papers already published in the journal, one can generally grasp the submission format. Here are a few specific requirements that are not mentioned in the Guide for Authors: Times New Roman font, size 4 or 5; the journal publishes papers in columns, but do not format your submission in columns; it is recommended to include figures and tables within the main text, but they can also be placed separately; submit a trial submission before your final submission to understand the required documents. These are just a few things to keep in mind for first-time submitters.

(1) 讚！ | 月亮月亮你不懂

Without G, the editor asked me to come back and make some formatting changes. After making the changes, I returned. The current status is WE.

(0) 讚！ | 豆是豆豆

You made a mistake. In this case, the opinions of the two reviewers are not consistent. We need to add another reviewer.

(0) 讚！ | Tingjue Wang

Dialed the wrong number.

(0) 讚！ | Tingjue Wang

No G, return for formatting changes. I've already returned once before, do you have a template, experts?

(0) 讚！ | 豆是豆豆

Submitted on September 13th
During the National Day holiday, it was required to complete the review
Today, on October 10th, it has once again become under review
What does this mean?

(0) 讚！ | dyt

"Directly dipped, should be gone."

(0) 讚！ | 豆是豆豆

Submitted to Journal on 9/24.

(0) 讚！ | 豆是豆豆

Hello, have you resubmitted it? Are there any requirements for font and font size?

(0) 讚！ | dyt

I would like to ask if this journal has a submission template. What font and font size do people usually use? Is it okay to use Times New Roman size 5 font?

(1) 讚！ | dyt

With editor refers to the initial review by the editor. If the editor wants to send the manuscript for external review and notices some issues, they will ask you to make revisions first in order to make the external review process smoother. This is similar to a pre-review process, where the issues raised are similar to those in a normal review, focusing on grammar, writing style, and specific methods, all of which help improve the quality of the article. Of course, during the formal review process, the editor will also provide feedback, showing great responsibility and seriousness, although the speed may be a bit slow. Additionally, BE requires the use of British English throughout the manuscript, so please keep this in mind when writing and translating.

(0) 讚！ | Liulei Pan

Could you please tell me how long it takes with the editor? Can you provide a detailed explanation of the progress and process?

(0) 讚！ | 石大李博

Does "with editor" mean the initial review? What kind of issues are typically raised during the initial review and revision process?

(0) 讚！ | 石大李博

August 11, 2024 With Editor

(0) 讚！ | ahoge

Among the journals I have submitted to, this is the most rigorous. The two editors are very responsible, making edits to every single word and sentence of the article. It's just incredible, they are so meticulous.

(0) 讚！ | Ming_K

Early stage waiting for collapse: After more than a month, the editor began the initial review. After the initial review was revised, it ended up in the spam folder and the editor did not receive it. Unable to bear it, an email was sent to rescue it and it was sent for external review.

Mid-term changes to tears: The review speed was normal, the reviewers and two editors were conscientious, and there were dozens of comments in total. After making revisions for a month and a half, it was resubmitted for a second review.

Finally, receiving relief: The editor and reviewers were moved by the possibly over 40 pages of review responses (or maybe they were just too long to read). They agreed to accept it, and the editor helped with grammar corrections. It was a successful outcome.

(0) 讚！ | Liulei Pan

2024-02-20: Submission
2024-03-27: Under review
2024-05-02: Major revision
2024-06-12: Revised submission
2024-06-17: Under review
2024-07-14: Accept

(0) 讚！ | Liulei Pan

Submit by June 30th, 2024.

(0) 讚！ | FACTUAL

Please translate the following paragraph into English: None

(0) 讚！ | 贾宪

Hello, I would like to ask if this journal manuscript can only be submitted in Word format?

(0) 讚！ | theta

How are you doing now?

(0) 讚！ | zhao512