Why are there so few people submitting to this journal?

(0) 讚！ | 瓦妮莎

2.9 Submission
5.4 First round of review comments returned (major revisions)
5.20 Revised
6.14 Second round of review comments returned (minor revisions)
6.15 Revised
6.25 Third round of review comments returned (minor revisions)
6.26 Revised
6.30 Fourth round of review comments returned (minor revisions - formatting issues)
7.3 Revised
7.4 Accepted

(0) 讚！ | zhang

The editor is very responsible and accepted my submission after correcting the grammar errors. This journal is expected to be upgraded to a higher classification, and many experts in the field publish their articles in it.

(0) 讚！ | 来者不拒

This journal editor is very responsible, and the processing efficiency is very high.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名用户 #

very junk journal, many articles inside are a lot of mistakes, includingThe theory is completely wrong, can't the editor edit it?This kind of journal is really shameful.

(0) 讚！ | 11

1.21 contribution4.15 Return of the first review draft4.23 repaired back8.12 Return of the second review draft8.14 second repair8.29 receivingThe editor is very good, personally modify

(0) 讚！ | Anonymous

1.21Submission4.15 Return of the first review draft4.23 repaired back8.12 Return of the second review draft8.14 second repair8.29 receivingEditor-in-chief is very good, personally modify

(0) 讚！ | htw1116@hnu.edu.cn

After submitting, I received an acceptance letter within two months. I waited another 10 months for the article to publish. For my second submission, the time to publish was much faster; the article was published four months after acceptance.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

Journal Homepage URL: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find ... ription#description

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

Reply to the 1st floor, how can it be 12 months for review??

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

The review period is longer, and there are fewer articles in each issue, which is easier to hit.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名