Submission on 30th October 2024, still with editor. It's a review article. How long should I wait before requesting a status update?

(0) 讚！ | hui hui

It has been half a month since submission, and it is still with the editor. It is a review article that was submitted. How long should I wait before sending a reminder for the manuscript?

(0) 讚！ | hui hui

Good luck!

(0) 讚！ | 培胜超级甜

The review process is very fast, the editors are also very good, and the suggestions from the reviewers are very professional.

(0) 讚！ | 小fairy侠

Submitted on July 17th; Under review since July 20th... This speed is slower than a snail's. Submission requires caution.

(0) 讚！ | 大眼睛@123

Just submitted 2 days ago and the editor was very efficient. It's already under review, now waiting for the results

(0) 讚！ | Wu bo bo

Submitted articles must focus on drugs for animals and cells. There are also many pharmacological experiments afterwards. Rejections are quick, usually within 3 days. Articles that are more focused on chemistry or biology may be preferred for submission, rather than those on traditional Chinese medicine or small molecules

(0) 讚！ | Gabrielruby

No response after submitting for 11 days

(0) 讚！ | 丹尼欧

This is really slow, it has been 10 days with the editor

(0) 讚！ | xu_ye

Why can't I log in after registering? It keeps saying my password is incorrect, even though it's correct! Finally logged in, but it shows that my vote was not recorded

(0) 讚！ | 墟散寻白

Do all authors need to confirm the submission?

(0) 讚！ | 浅时光

Embrace good luck

(0) 讚！ | 霸王初瑶

The processing speed is extremely slow, with one month for editing; two months for review; three months for rejection notification. Please be cautious when submitting manuscripts, and for those who are in a hurry to graduate, please do not submit.

(1) 讚！ | Laoding

2023.03.21 submission,
2023.03.28 under review,
2023.04.21 major revision,
2023.05.12 revised,
2023.05.16 required reviews completed,
2023.05.23 accept

The review process was fast, the editor was friendly, and the handling of the manuscript was also efficient. The comments provided by the reviewers were constructive and had a meaningful impact on the final version of the article.

(1) 讚！ | 蓝兰@小8

2023.04.21 Submitted
2023.04.24 Under review
2023.05.10 Required reviews completed
2023.05.15 Revision
2023.05.19 Accepted

(2) 讚！ | kiss彧

Translation:

20220813 Submitted
20220815 Under review
20220828 Major revision (It took only 15 days for the first round of review)
20220918 Revised
20220920 Under review
20220922 Required Reviews Completed
20220930 Minor Revision
20221004 Revised
20221007 Accepted

The process was very fast, taking less than two months from submission to acceptance. The reviewers provided very professional feedback.

(3) 讚！ | 阿宝vs汤大基

Three reviewers, all minor revisions, why is the decision written as major revision by the editor-in-chief, returned on August 16th, still no result, status still with editor

(0) 讚！ | 岭南凯定

May I ask if you are referring to a minor repair or a major repair? I have submitted 7 issues for major repair and it has been under review for 10 days.

(0) 讚！ | QiQWang

Review speed: 1.0 | Submission acceptance rate: 50.0 Focus on research direction: Chemistry Experience sharing: Just submitted. Wish me luck

(0) 讚！ | Luther Joan

Why can't I see the submission status after my teacher submits it as the first author on the submission system?

(0) 讚！ | 戊寅三岁啦

Why can't I see the submission status after my teacher submitted it, as the first author, all of them are 0

(0) 讚！ | 戊寅三岁啦

The first trial took over four months, and after five days of repair, it was accepted. The editing speed is very fast.

(0) 讚！ | 白鹭

Submit on November 9th in 21, with three reviewers, two revisions, and one rejection.
Receive a reply on February 8th in 22, but due to the pandemic, the response was delayed until March 25th. Minor image revisions were made on April 3rd, and the acceptance was confirmed on April 5th. The review process was indeed slow, but the editing process was fast after the revisions were made.

(0) 讚！ | 暴躁的土豆地雷

I submitted the paper on April 1st last year, and was notified of major revisions a few weeks later. After receiving the revision comments, I realized that the reason for the paper going back to "under review" from "required" on April 10th was because one reviewer recommended acceptance while another recommended rejection, and the third reviewer speculated that it was the editor's decision. Due to the lack of chemical raw materials, I didn't revise the paper until August 30th. I felt that the editor was very nice and recognized the value of the paper, as they readily agreed to a one-month extension. After revising, the paper was accepted within three weeks. I initially thought that it would be difficult for the paper to be accepted as the journal is of high quality and the paper focused more on biology, with weaker aspects in chemical synthesis. So, in summary, my feeling is that the paper needs to cater to the journal's development and meet their requirements.

(4) 讚！ | 玦宁冰洛

The short version of the article title is a concise summary of the research content, which can be regarded as the "nickname" of the article

(0) 讚！ | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德