Except for the slow review process, everything else is fine. The well-known journal brand is trustworthy, but we do not recommend urgent submission. It takes one month to receive the initial review comments from four professional and scientific reviewers. The first revision is major, the second is minor, and the third does not require external review. Acceptance and payment notification will be sent within two years.

(0) 讚！ | arthurlee

Although it was accepted for publication, the process was too slow. I submitted in June 23, and the editor's review took about half a month, which was fine. However, the first round of feedback didn't come until early November, with a minor revision request. I made the revisions on November 26, but then heard nothing back. It wasn't until June of the following year (2024) that I sent an email urging them to respond, and it took two days for them to finally accept the article. I strongly suspect that the associate editor had left, as it seemed like the editor only took action after receiving my email.
The feedback from the reviewers was also strange, with some having very minor suggestions and even suggesting acceptance, while others seemed to have not understood the article at all, rambling on and even questioning basic linear regression. However, the editorial team provided a language editing waiver, although it wasn't clear on what basis. The language editor didn't do much, but I was satisfied as it at least reduced the burden of proofreading.
Overall, I do not recommend submitting to this journal as the process is too slow and not particularly professional.

(2) 讚！ | 田品

On the third day after being rejected, I received an invitation to serve as an academic editor... It feels like this journal just wants to deceive people into doing work.

(0) 讚！ | peisirs

The first review took more than six months, and received feedback from 8 reviewers. At first, it seemed like the journal was quite conscientious, but upon closer inspection, one of the reviews was only a short sentence, two reviews were clearly generic and likely generated by AI, and one review was completely irrelevant to the content of the paper. It seemed like the editor had not checked them before sending them out. After revisions, it took almost another half year of just being on the initial checklist, with a couple of reminders in between. Finally, less than a week after being marked as "in review", the paper was rejected. The reason given was that it was believed the paper did not fully address the feedback from the first reviewer (the one with the short sentence). Despite having previously reviewed for and worked as an academic editor for this journal in an effort to build credibility, the submission experience was not very pleasant.

(0) 讚！ | peisirs

Based on my knowledge of them, it is likely that the manuscript you submitted for review will be accepted. Hang in there. This journal can be tough and test your patience

(0) 讚！ | D_D

Without waiting for more than 1 year, forget it. Waiting for half a year is normal especially after repairs. Just wait

(0) 讚！ | D_D

Just been hired. I can only say that if you don't have at least a year and a half, don't expect to escape... It's normal to request reviews during the submission period. Based on my understanding of it, having you review it will actually point out no major issues with the article you submitted. I have reviewed many for them, and they don't actually require a long review time. It is their internal delay that causes the delay, possibly intentionally dragging out the time. Details unknown

(0) 讚！ | D_D

Submitted on November 18, 2022, received an email on January 26, 2023 saying they have received all the reviewers' comments. Waited until October 30, suddenly given minor revisions, and the editor has changed. Submitted the revisions 15 days later, sent another email on January 3, 2024, and received a reply the same day saying they are waiting for the final opinions. Today is January 28, still waiting

(0) 讚！ | 圆圆圆

2023.12.15 proof
2023.12.22 ONLINE
For reference only

(0) 讚！ | BIGSHEEP

The initial review time is indefinite, which actually doesn't mean much. My submission received first feedback after a little over four months. 
The APC has been changed to 1500

(0) 讚！ | BIGSHEEP

Excuse me, how long will it take for the Initial Checklist status?

(0) 讚！ | Fletcher

Revised version should be submitted by July 2023, with a two-week deadline for minor revisions

(0) 讚！ | BIGSHEEP

As one of the few high-impact SSCI journals with large publication volume, it is a good choice for doctoral students who want to lie flat. However, it is important to note that the journal has a slow review process, so it is better to submit early

(0) 讚！ | 大肥羊

I submitted my paper on 12-Oct-2022, received major revisions in December, and submitted again in January. After one month, they told me there was a formatting issue with a section. After I made the corrections and resubmitted the next day, it changed to "In Review." Now, in September, it is still in review, almost one year later

(0) 讚！ | 大灰狼

The replies from everyone are really a bit slow. After submitting this article, it took one and a half months to receive the comments from the external reviewer. The editor asked for minor revisions and gave a 15-day deadline. It was only fixed and sent back in the past two days. Hopefully, it can be accepted soon.

(0) 讚！ | 中小学生

How long did it take for your revision to be reviewed?

(0) 讚！ | 中小学生

How long does it take for you to enter "in review" after you have finished repairing it?

(0) 讚！ | 中小学生

It's really slow. After the repair, it has been in review for nearly 5 months, without any updates. Has anyone ever been accepted? How long does this journal actually take for review? I can't wait anymore!!!

(0) 讚！ | 山楂树

How are things going? After two months of revision, it entered "In Review", and it has been three months in "In Review". Last month, I sent a reminder letter, saying they are still looking for an editor, yes, an editor, not a reviewer!

(0) 讚！ | rc

Is there any news? May I ask?

(0) 讚！ | 山楂树

I am also waiting. It has been over seven months since I submitted my application for minor revisions, and it still shows "In review". I don't know when the results will be released.

(0) 讚！ | Linda

The speed is extremely slow. It has been 8 months since the minor revision was submitted, but there is still no result. While waiting for the paper result, an invitation for peer review came instead.

(1) 讚！ | Allen Zheng

Does it take several months for the review? Can anyone who has passed share their experience? Thank you very much.

(14) 讚！ | t蛮蛮

How long does it take for the review? It has been several months already ?

(0) 讚！ | 山楂树

I want to ask, it has been 4 months already, and it is still "in review". Is this status the external review status?

(0) 讚！ | 只有努力，才会成功