X
    學術可視化工作室RC   登錄   提交文稿
學術英文編修

CITIES

期刊標題檢索 CITIES 最新評論: The journal is good, just a bit slow. The peer review process takes ov... (2024-06-16)


期刊名稱:   ISSN:   主題領域:   影響因子範圍: -
索引:   類別:   開放訪問:   排序方式:

[CITIES]您好,您是該頁面的第 65431 位訪客。

期刊簡介
期刊名稱CITIES CITIES

(According to the latest JCR data, this journal is not indexed in the JCR.)
LetPub Score
8.7
50 ratings
Rate

Reputation
9.5

Influence
7.9

Speed
7.0

期刊簡稱CITIES
ISSN0264-2751
E-ISSN1873-6084
h-indexN.A.
CiteScore
CiteScoreSJRSNIPCiteScore Rank
11.201.7331.949
Subject fieldQuartilesRankPercentile
Category: Social Sciences
Subcategory: Sociology and Political Science
Q129 / 1466
Category: Social Sciences
Subcategory: Urban Studies
Q17 / 279
Category: Social Sciences
Subcategory: Development
Q112 / 306
Category: Social Sciences
Subcategory: Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management
Q119 / 146

自引率 (2023-2024)8.30%自引率趨勢
掲載範囲
官方網站https://www.journals.elsevier.com/cities
在線稿件提交
開放訪問No
出版商Elsevier
主題領域URBAN STUDIES
出版國/地區
發行頻率
創刊年0
每年文章數496每年文章數趨勢
黃金OA百分比26.92%
Web of Science 四分位
2023-2024
WOS Quartile: Q1

CategoryEditionJIF QuartileJIF RankingJIF Percentage
URBAN STUDIESSSCIQ15/77
索引 (SCI or SCIE)Social Science Citation Index
鏈接到PubMed Central (PMC)https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=0264-2751%5BISSN%5D
平均審稿時間 *來自出版商的數據:
來自作者的數據:
競爭力 *來自作者的數據:
參考鏈接
相關期刊 【CITIES】CiteScore趨勢
自引率趨勢 每年文章數趨勢
作者評論
*所有的審稿過程指標,如接受率和審稿速度,僅限於用戶提交的稿件。因此,這些指標可能無法準確反映期刊的競爭力或速度。
  • 同一學科的期刊
  • CiteScore趨勢
  • 自引率趨勢
  • 每年文章數趨勢
  •  
    學科內的可信期刊 影響因子
    Energy EconomicsH-index: 0

    CiteScore: 18.60
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC LITERATUREH-index: 0

    CiteScore: 17.80
    QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICSH-index: 0

    CiteScore: 24.20
    AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEWH-index: 0

    CiteScore: 18.60
    JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICSH-index: 0

    CiteScore: 15.80
    Journal of EconometricsH-index: 135

    CiteScore: 8.60
    Global Food Security-Agriculture Policy Economics and EnvironmentH-index: 31

    CiteScore: 20.90
    Energy PolicyH-index: 178

    CiteScore: 17.30
    China Finance Review InternationalH-index: 0

    CiteScore: 12.40
    WORLD BANK RESEARCH OBSERVERH-index: 0

    CiteScore: 12.60
    學科內最受檢索的期刊 頁面查看次數
    Energy Policy210872
    ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS93392
    Resources Policy71363
    Energy Economics57768
    QUANTITATIVE FINANCE56296
    Finance Research Letters50545
    SOCIO-ECONOMIC PLANNING SCIENCES48524
    FOOD POLICY46628
    Journal of Econometrics45156
    ECONOMETRICA44401
  •  

    CITIES CITIES
    明年預測:
    穩步上升 無變化 逐步下降  刷新
  •  

     
  •  

     


首頁    上一頁    1    2    3    下一頁    末頁  (頁
/3)
  [CITIES] 的評論撰寫評論
作者: rhcrazyy


領域: 经济学
審稿時間: 7.0 month(s)
結果: 修改後接受


撰寫評論

2024-06-16 23:47:40 評論於
The journal is good, just a bit slow. The peer review process takes over a month to complete, and each round at the editorial office takes at least another month, which is quite frustrating. The second round took over two months, but luckily a decision to accept was made a few days after it started being processed. It seems like the journal is not likely to reject after revisions have been made, so there shouldn't be a problem with accepting it if the revisions are done carefully
(0) 讚! | rhcrazyy

作者: J&C


領域: 工程技术
審稿時間: 0.0 month(s)
結果: 待定&不明


撰寫評論

2024-06-08 14:04:53 評論於
I wanted to ask, have you ever had a change in date after a reviewer's response?
I encountered a similar issue, where one reviewer completely disappeared
(0) 讚! | J&C

作者: 窝斯泥蝶


領域: 计算机科学
審稿時間: 2.0 month(s)
結果: 修改後接受


撰寫評論

2024-02-17 18:42:14 評論於
The entire process left a very good impression on me, it was very efficient and professional
(0) 讚! | 窝斯泥蝶

作者: Cici雨


領域: 环境科学与生态学
審稿時間: 4.0 month(s)
結果: 拒稿


撰寫評論

2024-01-24 12:51:31 評論於
Submitted on 10/03, underwent external review on 17th, after four months received two sets of feedback from external reviewers, and was rejected in early January. One reviewer gave constructive feedback with a few suggestions for minor revisions. The other reviewer provided only two somewhat unreasonable methodological comments, leading to rejection by the editor. A rebuttal letter was sent to the editorial office and an email response indicated that the editor had been informed, awaiting further response
(0) 讚! | Cici雨

作者: Cici雨


領域: 环境科学与生态学
審稿時間: 4.0 month(s)
結果: 拒稿


撰寫評論

2024-01-24 12:46:16 評論於
Submitted in early October of the 23rd year, external review on the 17th, received two external review opinions until mid-January, one provided good feedback and suggested a few points for modification, and the other gave two absurd and negative opinions before being directly rejected by the editor. Refuting each of the two opinions from external review 2, I wrote a rebuttal letter, replied to the editor with the feedback, and am awaiting a response
(0) 讚! | Cici雨

作者: CarolGU


領域: 环境科学与生态学
審稿時間: 0.0 month(s)
結果: 待定&不明


撰寫評論

2024-01-13 22:13:35 評論於
It has been two months since submitting the manuscript, and it is still in "with editor" status. Only a template reply was received after following up
(1) 讚! | CarolGU

作者: Nature 小弟


領域: 经济学
審稿時間: 10.0 month(s)
結果: 修改後接受


撰寫評論

2023-12-01 22:51:42 評論於
The journal is very good, the editors are very responsible, and the reviewers' comments are able to stand at a certain height, starting from the perspective of the whole world and all humanity. The revision process is painful, but it is also a kind of training. I hope that others can learn from it and truly promote the progress of the discipline, influencing the development of human civilization
(0) 讚! | Nature 小弟

作者: 陆伯言


領域: 经济学
審稿時間: 0.0 month(s)
結果: 待定&不明


撰寫評論

2023-10-26 08:48:36 評論於
The final editor handled it. It's funny that one reviewer went missing, and the other reviewer uploaded the comments from the first round of reviews. I really can't believe it, what kind of attitude do reviewers have nowadays. Got minor revisions on October 17, had 15 days to respond, the editor gave 3 suggestions. Revised on the 23rd, accepted on the 25th. It's been almost a year of back and forth, submitted on November 28, 2022. Fortunately, the result was good, compared to the 80 days online for the total cycle, it's like night and day
(0) 讚! | 陆伯言

作者: J&C


領域: 工程技术
審稿時間: 0.0 month(s)
結果: 待定&不明


撰寫評論

2023-10-11 16:13:33 評論於
The first time I saw a major revision, I was only given a month
(0) 讚! | J&C

作者: 陆伯言


領域: 经济学
審稿時間: 0.0 month(s)
結果: 待定&不明


撰寫評論

2023-09-16 19:47:50 評論於
I give up. Returned for revisions on April 21st, under review on May 1st. One reviewer uploaded comments on May 24th, while the other reviewer disappeared after accepting the invitation. Still no response. I have reminded the journal, but no results. Feeling dizzy
(0) 讚! | 陆伯言

作者: Van


領域: 环境科学与生态学
審稿時間: 0.0 month(s)
結果: 待定&不明


撰寫評論

2023-09-11 10:44:32 評論於
Please translate the following paragraph into English and Japanese, and use "English Translation:" and "Japanese Translation:" as titles
(0) 讚! | Van

作者: shire123


領域: 计算机科学
審稿時間: 10.0 month(s)
結果: 修改後接受


撰寫評論

2023-08-18 01:11:13 評論於
Submitted in October 22nd
Received first review results in February 23rd, one minor revision and two major revisions
Revised and submitted in March
This round was quite fast, received second review results in April, two acceptances and one major revision from a reviewer.
Since the reviewer had doubts about certain methods used in the paper, the original text was basically not modified. Had an argument with the reviewer and informed the editor about the situation, and finished the revisions at the end of April.
This round was quite long, received reviewer’s comments in early July, the same reviewer still held onto an issue. The editor requested us to either revise or provide arguments to refute the reviewer, and mentioned that the decision of acceptance will be based on this round of responses.
Made revisions within a week, mainly refuting the reviewer's comments, and submitted.
Received acceptance notice in August.
Overall, the process was smooth, but the total time was still somewhat long (10 months). The associate editor always provided some friendly suggestions during each review, making the submission process comfortable
(0) 讚! | shire123

作者: 南瓜goodluck


領域: 管理学
審稿時間: 0.0 month(s)
結果: 待定&不明


撰寫評論

2023-08-04 19:51:16 評論於
Does anyone know if it is necessary for each author to click on the link to confirm co-authorship after submitting a manuscript? Will it be rejected if they do not click on it?
(0) 讚! | 南瓜goodluck

作者: Erin_Cloud


領域: 地球科学
審稿時間: 0.0 month(s)
結果: 待定&不明


撰寫評論

2023-07-13 10:19:37 評論於
The whole process took nearly a year, and the editor only found one reviewer. In the end, the reviewer even gave a rejection opinion... It took too long.
(0) 讚! | Erin_Cloud

作者: Van


領域: 环境科学与生态学
審稿時間: 0.0 month(s)
結果: 待定&不明


撰寫評論

2023-06-16 12:41:52 評論於
with editor for about a month, review process takes about five months, currently in "Decision in Process", let's see how long it will take!!! Be cautious when submitting!
(0) 讚! | Van

作者: Van


領域: 环境科学与生态学
審稿時間: 0.0 month(s)
結果: 待定&不明


撰寫評論

2023-06-16 12:39:30 評論於
Just following up, it has been nearly 6 months since submission for review, and now it is "Decision in Process".
(0) 讚! | Van

作者: Van


領域: 环境科学与生态学
審稿時間: 0.0 month(s)
結果: 待定&不明


撰寫評論

2023-06-16 12:38:01 評論於
Follow-up to come, will the final modification be accepted or rejected?
(0) 讚! | Van

作者: 陆伯言


領域: 经济学
審稿時間: 0.0 month(s)
結果: 待定&不明


撰寫評論

2023-05-25 13:46:05 評論於
The decision/opinion states "I ask you for a major revision" and gives a time frame of 3 months. If it were 1 month, it would probably be considered a minor revision, or maybe a moderate revision.
(0) 讚! | 陆伯言

作者: 青青子衿悠悠我心


領域: 地球科学
審稿時間: 0.0 month(s)
結果: 待定&不明


撰寫評論

2023-05-22 22:01:32 評論於
May I ask how you knew it was a major revision? The feedback I received in the first round consisted of comments from two reviewers and an editor, with a one-month deadline for revisions. However, neither the system nor the email mentioned whether it required major or minor revisions; the status only shows as "revised".
(0) 讚! | 青青子衿悠悠我心

作者: 陆伯言


領域: 经济学
審稿時間: 0.0 month(s)
結果: 待定&不明


撰寫評論

2023-04-25 10:48:30 評論於
This journal is notoriously slow. My first round of review took a little over a month, and I received a major revision decision within 10 days. It has been 4 days since I resubmitted for revisions, and it is still with the editor.
(0) 讚! | 陆伯言

作者: Erin_Cloud


領域: 地球科学
審稿時間: 0.0 month(s)
結果: 待定&不明


撰寫評論

2023-04-25 08:55:03 評論於
After about 9 months, "Decision in Process" has been close to 20 days.
(0) 讚! | Erin_Cloud

作者: 陆伯言


領域: 经济学
審稿時間: 0.0 month(s)
結果: 待定&不明


撰寫評論

2023-04-21 22:53:15 評論於
Have new reviewers been added to the review process for both of your articles?
(0) 讚! | 陆伯言

作者: 幼稚菜狗


領域: 经济学
審稿時間: 12.0 month(s)
結果: 修改後接受


撰寫評論

2023-03-10 23:02:56 評論於
Recently, I got published two articles, one took 8 months and the other took 14 months. Both went through several rounds of revisions, and the editors and reviewers were very responsible.
(0) 讚! | 幼稚菜狗

作者: Erin_Cloud


領域: 地球科学
審稿時間: 0.0 month(s)
結果: 待定&不明


撰寫評論

2023-03-09 15:48:57 評論於
It has been eight months since the manuscript submission, does it really take this long? I have sent two reminder emails but there has been no response at all...
(1) 讚! | Erin_Cloud

作者: mia9999


領域: 地球科学
審稿時間: 0.0 month(s)
結果: 待定&不明


撰寫評論

2023-03-07 09:56:41 評論於
May I ask how long it will take for you to receive the message again?
(0) 讚! | mia9999

首頁    上一頁    1    2    3    下一頁    末頁  (頁
/3)

開始撰寫 [CITIES] 的評論:





Contact us

Contact us  

Your name*

Your email*

Your message*

Please fill in all fields and provide a valid email.

Security Code*