Hello, may I ask if there are any results yet?

(0) 讚！ | Chong

Hello, may I ask if there are any results yet?

(0) 讚！ | Chong

The second review process has been going on for almost 10 months now, with one of the reviewers being unreachable. There has been no progress at all. Despite reminders, there has been no invitation for a new reviewer, and the editor has not provided any feedback either.

(1) 讚！ | J&C

Hello, may I ask if there are any results available?

(0) 讚！ | Chong

Hello, may I ask how are the results?

(0) 讚！ | 啾妮

5.14 submission
5.18 external review
6.9 return from external review
7.10 major revision
It is a journal with a very fast turnaround time that I have encountered.

(0) 讚！ | dramar

The journal is good, just a bit slow. The peer review process takes over a month to complete, and each round at the editorial office takes at least another month, which is quite frustrating. The second round took over two months, but luckily a decision to accept was made a few days after it started being processed. It seems like the journal is not likely to reject after revisions have been made, so there shouldn't be a problem with accepting it if the revisions are done carefully

(0) 讚！ | rhcrazyy

I wanted to ask, have you ever had a change in date after a reviewer's response?
I encountered a similar issue, where one reviewer completely disappeared

(0) 讚！ | J&C

The entire process left a very good impression on me, it was very efficient and professional

(0) 讚！ | 窝斯泥蝶

Submitted on 10/03, underwent external review on 17th, after four months received two sets of feedback from external reviewers, and was rejected in early January. One reviewer gave constructive feedback with a few suggestions for minor revisions. The other reviewer provided only two somewhat unreasonable methodological comments, leading to rejection by the editor. A rebuttal letter was sent to the editorial office and an email response indicated that the editor had been informed, awaiting further response

(0) 讚！ | Cici雨

Submitted in early October of the 23rd year, external review on the 17th, received two external review opinions until mid-January, one provided good feedback and suggested a few points for modification, and the other gave two absurd and negative opinions before being directly rejected by the editor. Refuting each of the two opinions from external review 2, I wrote a rebuttal letter, replied to the editor with the feedback, and am awaiting a response

(0) 讚！ | Cici雨

It has been two months since submitting the manuscript, and it is still in "with editor" status. Only a template reply was received after following up

(1) 讚！ | CarolGU

The journal is very good, the editors are very responsible, and the reviewers' comments are able to stand at a certain height, starting from the perspective of the whole world and all humanity. The revision process is painful, but it is also a kind of training. I hope that others can learn from it and truly promote the progress of the discipline, influencing the development of human civilization

(0) 讚！ | Nature 小弟

The final editor handled it. It's funny that one reviewer went missing, and the other reviewer uploaded the comments from the first round of reviews. I really can't believe it, what kind of attitude do reviewers have nowadays. Got minor revisions on October 17, had 15 days to respond, the editor gave 3 suggestions. Revised on the 23rd, accepted on the 25th. It's been almost a year of back and forth, submitted on November 28, 2022. Fortunately, the result was good, compared to the 80 days online for the total cycle, it's like night and day

(0) 讚！ | 陆伯言

The first time I saw a major revision, I was only given a month

(0) 讚！ | J&C

I give up. Returned for revisions on April 21st, under review on May 1st. One reviewer uploaded comments on May 24th, while the other reviewer disappeared after accepting the invitation. Still no response. I have reminded the journal, but no results. Feeling dizzy

(0) 讚！ | 陆伯言

Please translate the following paragraph into English and Japanese, and use "English Translation:" and "Japanese Translation:" as titles

(0) 讚！ | Van

Submitted in October 22nd
Received first review results in February 23rd, one minor revision and two major revisions
Revised and submitted in March
This round was quite fast, received second review results in April, two acceptances and one major revision from a reviewer.
Since the reviewer had doubts about certain methods used in the paper, the original text was basically not modified. Had an argument with the reviewer and informed the editor about the situation, and finished the revisions at the end of April.
This round was quite long, received reviewer’s comments in early July, the same reviewer still held onto an issue. The editor requested us to either revise or provide arguments to refute the reviewer, and mentioned that the decision of acceptance will be based on this round of responses.
Made revisions within a week, mainly refuting the reviewer's comments, and submitted.
Received acceptance notice in August.
Overall, the process was smooth, but the total time was still somewhat long (10 months). The associate editor always provided some friendly suggestions during each review, making the submission process comfortable

(0) 讚！ | shire123

Does anyone know if it is necessary for each author to click on the link to confirm co-authorship after submitting a manuscript? Will it be rejected if they do not click on it?

(0) 讚！ | 南瓜goodluck

The whole process took nearly a year, and the editor only found one reviewer. In the end, the reviewer even gave a rejection opinion... It took too long.

(0) 讚！ | Erin_Cloud

with editor for about a month, review process takes about five months, currently in "Decision in Process", let's see how long it will take!!! Be cautious when submitting!

(0) 讚！ | Van

Just following up, it has been nearly 6 months since submission for review, and now it is "Decision in Process".

(0) 讚！ | Van

Follow-up to come, will the final modification be accepted or rejected?

(0) 讚！ | Van

The decision/opinion states "I ask you for a major revision" and gives a time frame of 3 months. If it were 1 month, it would probably be considered a minor revision, or maybe a moderate revision.

(0) 讚！ | 陆伯言

May I ask how you knew it was a major revision? The feedback I received in the first round consisted of comments from two reviewers and an editor, with a one-month deadline for revisions. However, neither the system nor the email mentioned whether it required major or minor revisions; the status only shows as "revised".

(0) 讚！ | 青青子衿悠悠我心