Has it been submitted for review?

(0) 讚！ | xueshu xiaobai

13.09.2024 Submitted to journal
14.09.2024 With editor
Good luck
Already submitted, leaving a mark

(0) 讚！ | 艾森伯格

Have you made any progress on your manuscript?

(0) 讚！ | yinyin19

Good journals, except for the slow pace, everything else is great. Hope to become a highly cited article~

(0) 讚！ | Xu Yifei

Hello, may I ask where I can contact the editors to urge for manuscripts on the public account?

(0) 讚！ | xiaoxiao1120

Congratulations on your article being accepted for publication!

(0) 讚！ | arcpy

Overall, the editing editor is quite responsible. The main issue is that reviewers A and B are too irresponsible. The comments they gave after the first review were decent, but they both disappeared, causing the entire process to take 17 months.
2022.07.14 Submission
2022.08.07 Under Review
2022.10.31 Major Revision by reviewers A and B
2022.12.01 Submission
2022.12.27 Under Review, reviewer A did not review and reviewer C was added
2023.05.23 Major Revision by reviewers B and C
2023.06.12 Submission
2023.06.23 Under Review, reviewer B did not review and reviewer D was added
2023.10.12 Minor Revision
2023.10.19 Submission
2023.11.01 Under Review
2023.12.06 Accept

(0) 讚！ | 渔樵耕读

It seems there is an option for a revised manuscript; if not, then replace it with the manuscript. Additional materials can only be placed in the appendix data, etc

(0) 讚！ | arcpy

When I submit my work to English journals, I usually directly upload the modified Word document (without track changes or highlighted text). I have never tried uploading a document with obvious editing marks like yours

(0) 讚！ | ayzx

Hello, I have now uploaded the first round of revisions, and I found that there is no option to upload the modified track changes. So I uploaded it in the additional materials section. However, the editor now requests that the highlighting in the supplementary file be removed. This should be the revised draft. I would like to ask how to resolve this

(0) 讚！ | mia9999

Hello, I have now uploaded the revised file for the first review and noticed that there is no option to upload a marked-up version. I uploaded it in the supplementary materials instead. However, the editor now requests that the highlighting in the supplementary file be removed. This should be the revised version. Can you please advise on how to proceed? If the highlighting is removed, should the screenshots of the revised sections in the response letter also be adjusted?

(0) 讚！ | mia9999

Who understands, still "With editor"

(0) 讚！ | 疯狂的兔子会receive

Yes, it is indeed because there was Chinese involved, such as translating the website into Chinese. The system did not recognize it properly, and as a result, the PDF generated with Chinese was unacceptable and got rejected.

(0) 讚！ | 顺利毕业aaa

Excuse me, OP, how did you solve the problem posted by the editor? I also encountered the same issue, specifically, what needs to be changed?

(0) 讚！ | OKC-KD

20230522 submitting
20230524 Return and revise the format, and resubmit the recommended reviewers
20230525 with editor

(0) 讚！ | 桐老师

You can send a system email to the responsible editor to inquire about the specific status of the manuscript.

(0) 讚！ | arcpy

It has been two months, still "With Editor".

(0) 讚！ | 疯狂的兔子会receive

In the manuscript, Chinese text or charts appear, and they need to be translated into English or have English notes.

(0) 讚！ | arcpy

Hello, I just submitted a post and it was rejected with the message "Please provide the item description in English language." May I ask what does this mean?

(0) 讚！ | 顺利毕业aaa

Hello, I just submitted a contribution and it was returned with the prompt "Please provide the item description in English language." May I ask what does this mean?

(0) 讚！ | 顺利毕业aaa

Borrowing the advice of the guru. I hope for good luck too.

(0) 讚！ | SilviaSCI

After three months, the manuscript entered the "under review" status with the editor. It underwent major revisions during the first review, which took two months. Following this, there was a month and a half for minor revisions. After the minor revisions, further minor revisions were required. The entire process, from submission to acceptance, took a total of one and a half years.

(0) 讚！ | 快快快接收

Does editing follow such a regular pattern?

(0) 讚！ | arcpy

Low quality or irrelevant articles may be rejected quickly, but sometimes taking longer is not necessarily a bad thing.

(0) 讚！ | arcpy

3.11 submitted, 3.16 with editor, 4.16 status still updated as with editor, anxious. How long does it usually take for everyone to get reviewed?

(0) 讚！ | SilviaSCI