Submitted May 22, 2024
Submissions Sent Back to Author May 27, 2024
Resubmitted May 27, 2024
With Editor May 28, 2024
Under Review May 31, 2024

(0) 讚！ | 贵金属小周

2024-05-30 submitted
2024-06-3 still submitted

(0) 讚！ | cfiber

2024-05-14 submitted
2024-05-21 with editor

(0) 讚！ | 潇洒哥

How is the senior's article going?

(0) 讚！ | Finn123

It's quite embarrassing for a materials scientist not to publish in Acta, why not submit to Advanced Materials?

(0) 讚！ | 潇洒哥

The process of editing the manuscript is currently slower

(0) 讚！ | 念念不忘必有回响

I have also submitted for review, but it has been almost 40 days, and Acta is really slow

(0) 讚！ | 媛吃萝卜蛋操心

Buddy submitted it, two weeks

(0) 讚！ | xxxhsu

How long does it take for the editors to review the submissions, brothers?
Submitted on February 16, 2024, and still no Manuscript Number assigned, it's been 10 days now

(6) 讚！ | 媛吃萝卜蛋操心

Submitted on 23.9.22 

Accepted on 24.2.22

(4) 讚！ | 电铸小王子

Initially rejected by NC SA, went directly to Acta
23.9.22 Submitted, editors very fast, sent out for review in 2 days;
23.11.9 Received comments, two reviewers, one major revision (tepid), one minor revision (positive), after major revision, re-review process took 2 months;
24.1.7 Revisions made, honestly a bit anxious during this period;
24.2.14 Received comments, minor revision, one month, first reviewer agreed to accept, second reviewer had two suggestions (accepted after modifications);
24.2.17 Second round of revisions;
24.2.18 Under review; still waiting

(128) 讚！ | chantonfi

Aug 23, 2023 submitted
Aug 27, 2023 with editor
Sep 09, 2023 under review
Oct 14, 2023 under review
Oct 27, 2023 under review
Nov 08, 2023 under review
Nov 17, 2023 under review
Dec 12, 2023 required reviews completed
Dec 14, 2023 major revision
Jan 14, 2024 resubmitted
Jan 14, 2024 with editor
Jan 15, 2024 with editor
Jan 25, 2024 under review
Feb 05, 2024 accepted

(72) 讚！ | CTang626

Making perovskite for Acta is not very good

(0) 讚！ | tmh123

Many people say that it is difficult to get published in Acta, but it is not as difficult as they imagine. I prepared an article to submit to NC, only to be told that similar content had already been published by someone else, who turned out to be a collaborator from our lab. Feeling frustrated, I had no choice but to submit to Acta. Luckily, the quality of my manuscript was accepted and it took only about a month and a half from submission to acceptance, which was quite fast

(66) 讚！ | BJM

Although the comments from the third reviewer did not mention rejection, the final decision should be rejection when the option is selected

(0) 讚！ | 西瓜是坏蛋

Actually, all three people were invited at the same time, but the third one accepted the review late. The first two reviewers made some comments, but did not reject it. The third reviewer said they were hesitant about rejecting or suggesting major revisions, but ultimately suggested major revisions. However, when it reached the editor, it was rejected

(0) 讚！ | 无名xiao卒

There is likely a difference of opinion, so we sought arbitration, but the outcome was not optimistic

(0) 讚！ | 整个大的

Hopes to disappoint only in an instant.
11.8 submitted
11.13 with editor
11.16 under review
11.23 under review
12.14 required reviews completed
12.14 under review
12.31 required reviews completed
01.04 reject

(0) 讚！ | 无名xiao卒

Hello, does it take two months to review Acta? It feels like a long cycle

(0) 讚！ | DadaW

Overall, things went quite smoothly, I wasted a lot of time myself, otherwise it might have been accepted within 3 months. This is my submission process, I hope it can help you
1. submit to journal 2023.08.28
2. with editor 2023.09.04
3. under review 2023.09.10
4. under review 2023.09.18
5. Major revisions (actually minor revision) 2023.11.09
6. resubmitted 2023.11.28 (here I wasted quite a lot of time)
7. Required Reviews Completed 2023.12.10
8. accept 2023.12.12
9. online 2023.12.13

(0) 讚！ | Sunny

4.28; submitted
5.7; with editor
6.7; under review
There were several changes in between, seems like can't find reviewers
7.21; under review with one reviewer's comments
9.2; under review, contacted customer service and was told there is only one reviewer, still waiting for the other one, couldn't stand it anymore, sent an email to urge, but no response for over ten days, feeling uneasy.
9.18; saw the status change at night, decision in process, stayed up all night nervously, at four in theraffic, it turned out to be minor revision, only one reviewer raised three minor issues.
10.7; minor revision suggestions submitted, status: submitted
11.10; under review Can't help but say, the editors are really slow.
11.27; required reviewers completed
12.4; checked early in the morning, status changed to decision in process
12.4; in the morning, Accepted. I just submitted my graduation thesis, and three seconds later, yes, just three seconds later, it got accepted. I wrote "Minor Revision" in the article status of my thesis, it's just so unlucky, a few seconds apart, it's really not easy to have an Acta in the field of metals, I also hope the journal can speed up the review process

(0) 讚！ | 科研太难了。。

After eight months of waiting, I finally received it. The process was so difficult, checking the status every day, watching countless times, it was too slow

(4) 讚！ | 科研太难了。。

Thank you, senior brother, for answering my questions and clearing up my confusion!

(0) 讚！ | DadaW

The number seen when downloading the PDF before the "with editor" status (submitted to journal) and the number seen after "with editor" may be different. The number will no longer change beyond that point

(0) 讚！ | Rockstone

Every time a new reviewer is added, the status will change to "under review" with a new date

(0) 讚！ | Rockstone