I submitted it on May 31st, but it still shows as being in the editor's hands today

(1) 讚！ | 月亮987

20240604 Associate Editor Assigned
20240611 Associate Editor Assigned

Our manuscript has been with Associate Editor Bin Liu for a week now and still hasn't been sent out. Not sure how much longer it will take

(0) 讚！ | Gbbb

Our manuscript has been with Deputy Editor Bin Liu for a week, and still has not been sent out. I wonder how much longer it will take

(0) 讚！ | Gbbb

What is the word count requirement? I see there are two word count requirements, one is not exceeding 3000 words, and the other is 3000-4000 words

(0) 讚！ | book_liu

The word count control is quite strict, and the editing process is fast; the quality of the journal is good, and I hope it continues to improve

(0) 讚！ | iesan

Excuse me, is this journal for submitting letters?

(0) 讚！ | Gbbb

Not bad

(0) 讚！ | chudddddddddddd

The first review of submissions coincides with the Chinese New Year, and the return of the revised manuscript coincides with the deadline, so it may be a bit slower

(0) 讚！ | 咸鱼fly

24.1.3 manuscript submitted
24.2.19 major revision (two reviewers gave minor revisions, one had positive comments and four questions)
24.3.3 revision submitted
24.3.22 minor revision (ready to accept, requested formatting changes)
24.3.23 revision submitted
24.3.27 accepted

(0) 讚！ | 咸鱼fly

12.22 submitted
12.27 in peer review
01.08 major revision (one major, three minor)
02.03 resubmitted
02.15 minor revision
02.17 resubmitted
02.22 accepted

(6) 讚！ | bcbcbca

I read the latest issue and personally think the quality is really average, let alone AM, even small is probably hard. But it's a new publication, so let's wait. For now, the prospects look bleak

(0) 讚！ | dataiyang

Submission on June 30, 2023
Received the review comments on July 25, 2023 from two reviewers. Minor revision from one reviewer, major revision from the other.
Received further comments on August 20, 2023
Agreed to accept with formatting modifications on August 25, 2023
Returned comments on the same day, August 25, 2023
Accepted on August 28, 2023
Overall, the reviewers' comments were very professional, the review process was quick, and it is now also included in the first division of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, so it is worth investing in

(204) 讚！ | tianshi

2023.5.24 Submission
2023.6.14 Review comments received from four reviewers. Three minor revisions, one major revision.
2023.6.30 Feedback received
2023.7.19 Review comments returned, accepted with formatting changes
2023.7.19 Feedback returned on the same day
2023.7.20 Accepted
The review process was fast, and the comments provided by the reviewers were very professional. ACS Materials Letters is doing well, as the impact factor of materials journals has generally decreased this year, but it has increased. The future looks promising, and it is highly regarded.

(8) 讚！ | 一直会飞的科研鱼

Instant IF12.1, just calculated.

(1) 讚！ | 宛陵小红旗

Overestimated, the real-time IF is only around 11.

(0) 讚！ | Dr. Sh

After two months of review, my paper in the AM series was rejected. The reviewers' comments were completely off the mark, but my boss kept emphasizing his belief in the quality of my work and told me not to be discouraged. Graduation is imminent, and although I already have a paper in a Tier 1 journal, I still feel that as a chemistry graduate student, it is not perfect without a paper in an ACS journal. So, I gathered my spirits and reorganized my thoughts, rewriting the entire article. I felt that the innovation was highlighted once again.

After my boss read it, he suggested choosing between ACS Nano and ACS Materials Letters. After reading the journal profiles, I felt that Nano is more established but has limited space. ACS Materials Letters is positioned as the flagship journal for ACS materials and is known for its rapid publication. I decided to give it a try. I was delighted to receive the editor's approval, and the review process took about a little over a month, which was acceptable. There were three reviewers, all very professional, and their questions were on point. They all gave evaluations in the top 15%. I felt that ACS Materials Letters has high requirements for the novelty of the article and maintains a high quality standard, which aligns with the journal's materials focus. I heard that the real-time impact factor has already exceeded 15, indicating its potential. I will definitely consider submitting to it again if I have good work in the future.

(2) 讚！ | 宛陵小红旗

Can this journal keep up with ACS Energy Letters?

(0) 讚！ | 一夜很静

Can I apply for the direction of physics and metamaterials? Can someone who has applied before tell me if it is difficult?

(0) 讚！ | YC_seu

I have submitted two articles before, both were reviewed by three reviewers and required three revisions. I have decided not to submit any more in the future as the progress has not been as good as I had imagined.

(6) 讚！ | xiaoyuzi

The phrase "11/16 In peer review" is already in English. It indicates that the mentioned text or document is currently undergoing peer review.

(0) 讚！ | Dr.Jim

Seeking help from fellow research friends who have submitted before, does assigning an editor mean that the paper can be submitted for review?
Or is it necessary for the editor to make further decisions?

(1) 讚！ | Dr.Jim

7.20 submit
8.5 in peer review
8.30 major revisions
9.15 revision submit
9.16 in peer review
9.21 accept

The responsible Associate Editor, Osman M Bakr, is a leading figure in the field, with a fast review process and high expectations for innovation. Currently, many renowned experts in the industry are publishing in ACS Materials Letters. As a flagship journal in materials under ACS, it has great potential for development.

(6) 讚！ | 麒麟9010

11.23 submit - Submitted on November 23rd
11.25 in peer review - Under peer review on November 25th
12.21 minor revisions - Minor revisions completed on December 21st
1.7 revision submit - Revised version submitted on January 7th
1.8 in peer review - Under peer review on January 8th
2.3 minor revision (修改格式) - Minor revision (formatting changes) on February 3rd
2.3 当天修回 - Revised on the same day on February 3rd
2.5 accept - Accepted on February 5th

(3) 讚！ | 嗑盐小学渣

8.7: Submission
8.10: Assignment of editor
8.30: Major revision based on initial comments
9.15: First round of revisions based on reviewer comments
10.6: Editor accepts with formatting changes
10.10: Second round of revisions based on reviewer comments
10.15: Editor mentions high similarity rate
10.22: Revised
10.30: Accepted
The editor is very responsible and works quickly in handling manuscripts. ACS Materials Letters is optimistic about it.

(33) 讚！ | Octavio

May I ask if "under review" refers to email notifications or updates on the submission website?

(0) 讚！ | 1231346