So harsh, 5 reviewers?

(0) 讚！ | 独孤幻月96

23.9.27 Submitted
23.9.28 Associate Editor Assigned Monica A. Cotta
23.10.19 Reject & Resubmitted (180 days); Four reviewers, first one rejected with 7 comments, second one major revisions with 5 comments, two minor revisions with 3 comments each, editor with 6 formatting comments.
24.4.3 Resubmitted
24.4.4 Associate Editor Assigned Monica A. Cotta
24.4.30 Major Revise 21 days; Editor with 4 formatting comments, Reviewer 1: publish as is, Reviewer 3: 6 new comments.
24.5.7 Resubmitted
24.5.14 Minor Revise 14 days; Editor's comments: add responses to 4 comments from major revision to the article instead of just replying without changes.
24.5.16 Resubmitted
24.5.21 Word spelled wrong in Revised TOC
24.5.23 Accepted
24.5.30 Proof & Published ASAP
24.6.14 Published in the Journal

(0) 讚！ | 独孤幻月96

24/4/12 Submission
4/18 Assignment to Editor
4/22 Review
4/27 Revision (5 minor revisions, 29 comments for modification)
5/7 Editor's revision
5/11 Acceptance
The editing review process is fast, and this website provides a lot of reference information. Thank you

(0) 讚！ | AAA159

2024.2.15 Submission
2024.2.21 with editor
2024.2.25 under review
2024.3.15 Rejected and resubmitted after 180 days, four reviewers, 19 comments, two major revisions with additional references, one direct rejection with no suggestions, one rejection with suggestions
2024.4.10 Resubmission after revisions
2024.5.9 Accepted

(0) 讚！ | LL56

Hello, may I ask if your status has changed? I have submitted my paper for a month now and it was assigned to an editor four days after submission. However, it is still under review and has not progressed to being in peer review

(0) 讚！ | CHR

5.9 Submission
5.13 Editor Assignment
6.9 has been under review all this time,
The last time I submitted to an ACS journal, the review was in peer review. I don't know what's going on this time???

(0) 讚！ | CHR

Hello, my editor is also Nan Liu. Is the process quick, and has the paper been published yet?

(0) 讚！ | 小鱼儿

Is the article submitted to this journal directly under review?

(0) 讚！ | 小鱼儿

3.10 Submit manuscript
3.12 Assigned to editor Bowden
3.31 Review comments received, from 4 reviewers - 1 rejection, 1 minor revision, 2 major revisions, editor suggested major revisions (26 total comments, 20 days given, no additional experiments requested)
4.13 Submit response to review comments
4.15 Editor replied satisfied with response to review comments, no further reviewer suggested, provided 3 formatting modifications
4.18 Resubmit after formatting modifications
4.19 Accept
5.1 Publish

(0) 讚！ | 岳岳酱

I also have the same experience. The questions raised by the two reviewers are quite practical and friendly, but the third one is stubborn and refuses to pass, saying that my work lacks novelty and he doesn't understand what the author wants to convey through this work. The editor always listens to the third reviewer, rejecting my argument and even suggesting me to submit to journals like ACS Applied Optical Materials, wasting half a year

(0) 讚！ | Danielwtz

Unfortunately, the two small revisions were rejected directly, and the editor is Isabel Pastoriza Santos, who didn't provide any comments

(0) 讚！ | Danielwtz

The associate editor is Isabel Pastoriza Santos

(0) 讚！ | Danielwtz

After three months of initial submission, my paper was rejected. The first two reviewers provided minor revisions, but the third reviewer rejected it due to lack of novelty without asking substantial questions. After arguing, it was given a chance for resubmission. Three months after revisions, I resubmitted it, and one and a half months later, the results came back. The first two reviewers had no issues and accepted it, but the third reviewer, seemingly from Iran, raised new concerns that were not mentioned during the initial review. They even asked me to upload the software I used to GitHub and accused me of not making any new changes. I am truly frustrated. The associate editor assigned to me simply followed the reviewers' opinions without having their own judgment. This journal may not be trustworthy anymore, especially with the decline of AMI. Think twice before submitting

(0) 讚！ | Danielwtz

Hello, how long does it take for a paper to be indexed in SCI?

(0) 讚！ | 科研涛涛

I am also this editor, but your luck is really good

(0) 讚！ | xu

Hello, I would like to ask how long it takes to receive the online retrieval publication. Our school needs to retrieve it

(0) 讚！ | 科研涛涛

2024.04.01 Submission
2024.04.12 External review comments back, 4 reviewers, 2 major revisions, 2 minor revisions, a total of 20 comments.
2024.05.06 Supplementary experiments, tests, manuscript revisions, re-submission.
2024.05.11 Accepted after formatting revisions.
I sincerely thank Editor Ned Bowden and the reviewers for their suggestions. After making revisions based on their feedback, I feel that my article now provides a more comprehensive explanation of the work. I wish the ACS Applied Nano Materials journal continued success!

(0) 讚！ | 粉色独角兽

The reviewers were very professional and provided nearly 30 comments in total. The standard revision time was 3 weeks. After response, there were two technical revisions within approximately 10 days, including TOC and other details. Finally, the paper was accepted. It is currently not online

(0) 讚！ | stony

2.27 Submitted for review
3.21 External review returned (two major revisions, two minor revisions - 20 days)
4.9 Feedback received
4.11 Agreement on feedback, but high similarity index (two weeks)
4.16 Feedback returned
4.18 Accepted

(0) 讚！ | 巴扎黑123

I have also been assigned to Qi Limin's editing team, but so far I haven't received any news for several days. I saw others saying that they had been assigned to the editor for two months without any updates, so I'm a little anxious. I hope they will handle it soon

(0) 讚！ | Cola-Guan

Please edit, I submitted an article two years ago and it was accepted in one month by an editor named Zhao

(0) 讚！ | 吴江

I am also slow, I have been in the editor's hands all the time

(0) 讚！ | 桥

Why was the review process so quick after submission? It's been over ten days since the editors were assigned, but they haven't rejected or sent it for review yet

(0) 讚！ | 桥

Good journal, ACS should have a good development. The review process takes over a month, with three reviewers providing major revisions. After the revisions, it took another half a month to make formatting changes before acceptance

(0) 讚！ | 李先森

Oh my, I am also an editor. What should I do? I am a little scared. It has been a month since submission and still no news

(0) 讚！ | Xu