The editing is very good, but the requirements for the article format are very strict

(0) 讚！ | 新芙小郎君

Review speed: 2.0 | Submission hit rate: 50.0 Emphasized research direction: macromolecular Experience sharing: Submitted in March, reviewed by 2 reviewers in May, one of them commented that the article was not good, disappointing, while the other reviewer mainly suggested to supplement various experimental methods. After revising for 2 months, the two reviewers had some more questions, which were addressed in a month, with one reviewer pointing out a minor issue but providing helpful advice on how to address it. Returned in 3 days and accepted. Perhaps due to my limited ability, a 2-point article is not easy to handle

(0) 讚！ | 新芙小郎君

How long does it take to receive a reply after submitting it? How long does it take for the review?

(0) 讚！ | 东京嘉言

Please translate the following passage into English and Japanese, and title them as ":" and ":"

(0) 讚！ | 星熊咸英

Revision once, recommended for acceptance by reviewers, rejected by editor with templated reasons. Ridiculous

(0) 讚！ | 气甲爱欢

Even though there aren't any big changes this year, we'll see how things go in the future

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

Review speed: 2.0 | Submission acceptance rate: 75.0 Experience sharing: Most of the publications under BMC are like this, but it seems difficult to exceed 3 points. Now the polarization of journals is very severe

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

So steady, just a little bit stronger, and it's already surpassing 3 points? It's really hard, very hard

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

Review Speed: 12.0 Experience Sharing: The editing process is too slow for this magazine. It has been in the hands of the editor for over a month. The editor asked for several changes before submitting it. After making the changes, I sent it over and waited for 8 months without any news. I continued to wait, and if it was just a minor change, I would have accepted it. But waiting for a year only to receive a rejection would really make me want to jump off a building

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁