The suggested format by the editorial department at that time was (Last name, initial name, full paper title, journal full name, year; volume (number) first page-last page.) However, I noticed that some of the articles included in BBE are not in this format. If the format does not have any major issues, but only some minor ones, the reviewers or editorial department will point them out in the revision suggestions

(0) 讚！ | 磕币·簿莱蒽忑

Friend, can you send me a copy of your reference template?

(0) 讚！ | fred0538

2023.8.15 submitted
2023.8.16 we
2023.8.21 ur
2023.10.5 rrc
2023.10.26 Major Revise with a total of 16 questions from two reviewers, both with very positive attitudes
2023.11.16 resubmit revised manuscript
2023.11.17 we
2023.12.4 ur
2024.4.17 dip
2024.4.18 Minor Revise with only one reviewer providing feedback on 2 formatting issues, followed by inviting 3 reviewers including the original one, with two not responding and one declining directly, delaying for a total of four months
2024.4.21 resubmit revised manuscript
2024.4.22 we
2024.5.2 decision in process & accept, lasting for 8 and a half months, mainly due to the long delay in the second review causing significant agony

(0) 讚！ | yellow006

After carefully reviewing the reviewer's comments, the main issue is to update the references with the most recent publications from the past 24 years. I will make the revisions and resubmit

(0) 讚！ | 卷喵

I'm speechless. In November of 23, I was asked to resubmit my paper for major revisions based on the feedback from the reviewers and editor. I resubmitted in January of 24. After a month of review, it was rejected for not citing all the literature published in 24

(0) 讚！ | 卷喵

Is it submitted for review? About how long does it take?

(0) 讚！ | 要山葵不要秋葵

2024.1.8 Under Review

(0) 讚！ | 平安

Reject me, the editor asked me to revise and resubmit.

This reviewer is very strict and very serious (I should have read the article very seriously, even the words in it), and very professional, very focused on experimental details. A total of 45 suggestions for revision were given, and this major revision is enough for me to revise for more than two months, equivalent to updating half of the experimental results. In addition to being busy at the end of the year, if only one month is given for modification, it is estimated that the reviewer will not be satisfied, so rejection and resubmission for major revisions can still be understood. This article points out problems or suggestions from experimental settings to words (singular/plural, tense, phrases) and individual data in the table, showing a wealth of experience. I believe that the quality will be greatly improved after the revision, even though it is very tiring, I can only continue to revise. I'll come back later

(0) 讚！ | 卷喵

2023.11.5 resubmit the submission made one week ago, rejected twice due to formatting issues
2023.11.8 with editor until now
2024.1.8 Under Review

(0) 讚！ | 平安

You have received this message for one of two reasons. Either: (a) your manuscript has been transferred from another journal and you must now complete your resubmission, or (b) technical comments (included below) need to be addressed before resubmitting your manuscript. However, EngineeringTechnical comments (if applicable): are empty. Are there any formatting requirements?

(0) 讚！ | aim

Optional for non-OA journals

(0) 讚！ | 艾蕾小天使！

Excuse me, is this journal open access? There was no option regarding open access during the submission process

(0) 讚！ | dabing0212

Submission on 23.6.15, was rejected twice due to formatting issues (must strictly follow the journal's requirements)
Revision on 23.7.15, given one month for revision, very useful and professional revision comments
Revised on 23.8.12
Accepted on 23.9.21
Overall it's fine, just a bit slow in journal processing speed

(0) 讚！ | 艾蕾小天使！

I am not very responsible, after revising it, the editor still feels not very satisfied, giving another month to revise

(0) 讚！ | 卷喵

The second time I submitted to this journal, I felt that the process was still very fast, and it seems that the number of submissions is not very large.
20230711 Submitted
20230712 Under review by editor
20230724 Decision in process
20230725 Editor provided revisions, resubmitted after making changes (one month for revisions)
I will update again later.

(0) 讚！ | 卷喵

This journal is really speechless. I feel that the editor-in-chief is irresponsible. The reasons for rejection are all sorts of strange. They even said that the discussion on the dataset was not thorough enough, despite barely being reviewed, it was rejected by the editor-in-chief. It's ridiculous. Be cautious about submitting to this journal!

(0) 讚！ | Haipeng

Especially pretending, saying that they have received a large number of papers, with the manuscript number 341, submitted on May 19th, pretending so much that it makes one want to vomit.

(2) 讚！ | hugo

2023.5.18 Submit
2023.5.22 Technical advice
2023.5.23 Resubmit

(0) 讚！ | Tynice

Ten days later for processing, three more days for review, one month later for returning with revision comments. Half a month later for making revisions, a little over a week for returning with revision comments. Two days for making revisions, three days later accepted.

(0) 讚！ | 投稿太难了

How long does it usually take for the review process? It has been almost three weeks since it was with the editor.

(0) 讚！ | Paypay

The first review seems to have taken about half a year, with approximately 8 comments from two reviewers. After making modifications according to their suggestions, the paper has significantly improved.
PS: Do not resist the opinions of the reviewers.
Currently, it has been modified and submitted, awaiting the second round of review.

(0) 讚！ | ssaasdasd

2022.12.27 Received
The editor happened to be in the same field, but the first time the modifications were not made according to what the editor wanted. The next day, it was immediately returned for further modifications.
After careful modifications were made during the second time, it was sent back for rework on the 26th and received on the 27th.

(0) 讚！ | 卷喵

2022.10.21 External review completed, waiting for editing decision
2022.11.18 Minor revisions (received comments from one reviewer, made minor revisions. Editor made additional small editing suggestions)
2022.12.01 Minor revisions returned

(0) 讚！ | 卷喵

No, at that time my collaborator did not receive the email.

(0) 讚！ | yinglibme

Is there any result, my friend?

(0) 讚！ | 果