Submitted for review on the same day, it was quick, but the review process took a long time. After 4 or 5 months, some minor revisions were given, and the revisions were quickly completed. Overall speed was acceptable and relatively easy.

(5) 讚！ | guojiacai

The list of SCI zones of the Chinese Academy of Sciences is still a necessary reference list for the research performance rewards and title evaluations of many domestic universities and research institutions

(0) 讚！ | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

There are many types of journals, how to choose the right journal?

(0) 讚！ | 魂魄彦露

Do we need to consider different sections when selecting publications?

(0) 讚！ | Oswald Edie

Direct receipt within 14 days of submission.

(0) 讚！ | nihaojvzipi

Five days rejected

(0) 讚！ | Anonymous

Rejected for five days

(0) 讚！ | 四象惜玉

The response to my submission was very quick. Within a week of my first submission, they replied to me saying that the English expression was not good enough, and recommended several other editing agencies for this magazine and other article editing agencies, suggesting that I consider making improvements before resubmission. So I had the recommended agency revise it, but they replied saying that I didn't hire a professional English editor. After confirming multiple times that I didn't send the wrong version, I sent an email asking if there was any misunderstanding, but received no response. I strongly suspect that I encountered unscrupulous editors, and that I will need to have my paper edited by their magazine editors in order to pass

(0) 讚！ | 极乐寻山

Immediately after I submitted my article, the editor replied and stated that the language was poor and recommended that I submit my manuscript to an editing service. The editor said that I should resubmit after I edit the text. I submitted my manuscript to the editing service recommended by the editor; however, when I resubmitted the revised manuscript, they claimed that the language was still inadequate. I was unable to publish in this journal due to language issues in the end, despite following the editor’s recommendations. Unimpressed.

(0) 讚！ | jane

The review process is very fast, and the reviewers are very responsible~ Due to my own delay in revising, it took longer~ The first review took 26 days, the second review took 20 days, and acceptance after minor revisions took 3 days~

(0) 讚！ | 仙灵俊驰

The review speed is very fast, and the reviewer is very responsible. Because he has delayed the revision time, it is slower~ 26 days in the first instance.20 days in the second instance, 3 days after the minor repair~

(1) 讚！ | weevil fly

In any case, this bearish appearance will not change, so as long as it doesn't fall, we can consider ourselves lucky

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

Journal Homepage URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/toc/cbst20/current

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

A very good magazine, fast in speed, and both the external reviewers and editors are very responsible. I submitted it on January 29, 2012, and after three rounds of revisions, it was accepted on May 19th after the first and second major revisions

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

Trashy magazines, who cares, just submit and then we'll see

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

My article was submitted on November 29, 2010, and was accepted on March 20, 2011! This journal is overall pretty good. It only took about three months from submission to acceptance. That's fast!

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁