Hello, I want to ask you something. After revision, it became DIP after one week with the editor. It should have been UR when I went back. At that time, it was a major revision, but it was easily fixed. Have you experienced this step? I'm worried about being rejected

(0) 讚！ | sssssnz

Can I add you as a friend and ask you about the image processing method of this journal?

(0) 讚！ | 123爱思思7

The processing speed of this journal is quite good. I submitted it at the end of December last year and it was accepted on May 12th this year. The main reason for the long delay is that I didn't know how to handle many processes in the middle. However, this journal does have the most requirements for images among the articles I have submitted. It has been accepted now, but the text in the images needs to be changed, and I don't know how to do it yet

(0) 讚！ | 123爱思思7

Rejection after Major Revision
First Round: When submitting to this journal for the first time, the journal required the use of their own manuscript template during the first submission round. Citations were not allowed to exceed 50, and the number of accompanying figures and tables was limited (a bit of a hassle). The handling speed of the assistant editor was very fast. The first round of review took 3 months, with major revisions requested by 3 reviewers. The revision comments were quite simple, focusing on clarifying the research problem, purpose, and minor writing issues. There were no requests for changes regarding calculations, experiments, or data. The revised manuscript was submitted within a month. However, submitting the revised manuscript was a huge hassle. This time, the assistant editor required all co-authors to separately sign a contribution declaration and conflict of interest declaration, scan and upload them. Additionally, the requirements for uploading revised figures and tables were different from the first round, and these differences were not mentioned in the editor's letter, making the process feel confusing and inconsistent.
Second Round: After a month, the editor rejected the manuscript. Two reviewers mentioned that the issues from the first round had been effectively addressed and improved, but raised questions about the novelty of the article. One reviewer did not provide any comments.
Conclusion: It seems that this journal is run within a domestic circle, as both the editor and assistant editor encountered were Chinese. The review speed was average, neither slow nor fast, but the submission procedures were very cumbersome. This was the first time encountering such a hassle (articles accepted in other journals didn't have this level of complexity). In the first round of review, two reviewers provided overall positive evaluations, and one was neutral, yet the manuscript was still rejected after major revisions. It was quite a time waste, and I will not submit to this journal again in the future

(2) 讚！ | little_seven

Excuse me, is there any result yet?

(0) 讚！ | 尔尔

10 March 2022
With Journal Administrator

15 March 2022
With Editor

28 April 2022
Revision Required

3 reviewers

(1) 讚！ | kjmooo

How much is the layout fee?

(0) 讚！ | 三老板

With the first impact factor in 2020, the coverage of the journal is wide, it is open access, and it is relatively easy to be accepted. The manuscript was submitted in March 2019. Due to the change of journal editors and other reasons, the review cycle is relatively long. Comments were given 8 months later. It was accepted 3 months after revision and published soon afterwards. As the journal is becoming more and more mature, the review speed should change.

(1) 讚！ | Wisdomdou