期刊簡介 | |||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
期刊名稱 | Soil LetPub Score 7.3
50 ratings
Rate
Reputation 8.2 Influence 6.2 Speed 9.4 | ||||||||||||||||
期刊簡稱 | SOIL-GERMANY | ||||||||||||||||
ISSN | 2199-3971 | ||||||||||||||||
E-ISSN | 2199-398X | ||||||||||||||||
h-index | N.A. | ||||||||||||||||
CiteScore |
| ||||||||||||||||
自引率 (2023-2024) | 0.00%自引率趨勢 | ||||||||||||||||
掲載範囲 |
| ||||||||||||||||
官方網站 | https://www.soil-journal.net/ | ||||||||||||||||
在線稿件提交 | |||||||||||||||||
開放訪問 | Yes | ||||||||||||||||
出版商 | Copernicus | ||||||||||||||||
主題領域 | Agricultural and Biological Sciences | ||||||||||||||||
出版國/地區 | GERMANY | ||||||||||||||||
發行頻率 | |||||||||||||||||
創刊年 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||
每年文章數 | 33每年文章數趨勢 | ||||||||||||||||
黃金OA百分比 | 99.21% | ||||||||||||||||
OA Related Info | APC: Yes( EUR1030; ) APC waiver:Check Notes Other charges: No Keywords: plants、soil、atmosphere、health、biodiversity、food security Useful LinksAims & ScopeAuthor InstructionsEditorial BoardOpen peer review | ||||||||||||||||
Web of Science 四分位 ( 2023-2024) | WOS Quartile: Q1
| ||||||||||||||||
索引 (SCI or SCIE) | Science Citation Index Expanded | ||||||||||||||||
鏈接到PubMed Central (PMC) | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=2199-3971%5BISSN%5D | ||||||||||||||||
平均審稿時間 * | 來自出版商的數據: 來自作者的數據: 30 Weeks | ||||||||||||||||
競爭力 * | 來自作者的數據: | ||||||||||||||||
參考鏈接 |
| ||||||||||||||||
*所有的審稿過程指標,如接受率和審稿速度,僅限於用戶提交的稿件。因此,這些指標可能無法準確反映期刊的競爭力或速度。 |
|
首頁 上一頁 1 下一頁 末頁 (頁 | |
[Soil] 的評論 | 撰寫評論 |
作者: MapleVivid 領域: 环境科学与生态学 審稿時間: 8.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2022-07-04 02:20:32 評論於 The journal of the European Geosciences Union is quite challenging, and the number of articles published each year is very low. After the initial review and free plagiarism assessment, the manuscripts are published as preprints, followed by at least 6 weeks of open interactive discussion. This process is very helpful in improving the articles by receiving more useful opinions, but sometimes it can be quite lengthy depending on the field. Authors need to publicly respond to all comments from reviewers and scholars from various fields, and during this stage, they cannot upload modified manuscripts. It seems to resemble the forum style of the Frontiers series (I haven't submitted to it yet). Based on the author's provided responses and revision plans during the open discussion, the editor decides whether to allow revisions or reject the manuscript. After acceptance, all stages of review comments, different versions of the manuscript, and author responses are made public. Therefore, personally, I feel that this journal also provides a transparent sharing and learning platform for everyone to learn how to write and revise papers. I appreciate this rigorous publishing model by the Germans (except for the sometimes slow process, but at least it is transparent). Colleagues who mind publishing preprints can avoid it.(7) 讚! | MapleVivid |
作者: yxx 領域: 环境科学与生态学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2022-06-17 20:50:13 評論於 Very slow, the reviewers found do not match the field of the article. The second reviewer we found didn't respond for 20-30 consecutive people, either directly rejecting or not responding. There are also a few who accepted the review invitation but still did not reply after the deadline. It feels like the reviewers for soil really lack a sense of commitment.(13) 讚! | yxx |
作者: ling_19 領域: 农林科学 審稿時間: 7.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2022-01-19 16:44:17 評論於 Is the final decision a rejection?(0) 讚! | ling_19 |
作者: li9991 領域: 农林科学 審稿時間: 3.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2021-11-05 21:56:05 評論於 Other journals are different, they have a popular review process, which feels unprofessional. Some of the questions are explanations of nouns, which leaves one speechless. Everything is done in three months, and the editor accepts the revised images, but then waits for half a month and rejects it again, stating that there are problems with the experimental design. Sometimes, the system does not send emails for updates, and the opinions given by the editor are unacceptable. It feels like being biased and discriminated against when the submission is accepted and then rejected, encountering it once feels like being prejudiced and discriminated against.(11) 讚! | li9991 |
作者: 椭圆三向箔 領域: 农林科学 審稿時間: 12.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2021-09-19 11:13:08 評論於 This year is about to become the first quarter, everyone, let's put in some effort, and it will be done.(0) 讚! | 椭圆三向箔 |
首頁 上一頁 1 下一頁 末頁 (頁 |
Contact us