期刊簡介 | |||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
期刊名稱![]() | Insights into Imaging LetPub Score 5.9
50 ratings
Rate
Reputation 7.0 Influence 4.8 Speed 7.0 | ||||||||||||||||
期刊簡稱 | INSIGHTS IMAGING | ||||||||||||||||
ISSN | 1869-4101 | ||||||||||||||||
h-index | N.A. | ||||||||||||||||
CiteScore |
| ||||||||||||||||
自引率 (2023-2024) | 2.40%自引率趨勢 | ||||||||||||||||
掲載範囲 |
| ||||||||||||||||
官方網站 | https://www.springer.com/journal/13244 | ||||||||||||||||
在線稿件提交 | https://www.editorialmanager.com/INSI | ||||||||||||||||
開放訪問 | Yes | ||||||||||||||||
出版商 | Springer Berlin Heidelberg | ||||||||||||||||
主題領域 | Medicine | ||||||||||||||||
出版國/地區 | GERMANY | ||||||||||||||||
發行頻率 | |||||||||||||||||
創刊年 | 2010 | ||||||||||||||||
每年文章數 | 208每年文章數趨勢 | ||||||||||||||||
黃金OA百分比 | 99.66% | ||||||||||||||||
OA Related Info![]() | APC: Yes( GBP2190; USD3090; EUR2590; ) APC waiver:Check Notes Other charges: No Keywords: radiology、medical imaging Useful LinksAims & ScopeAuthor InstructionsEditorial BoardDouble anonymous peer review | ||||||||||||||||
Web of Science 四分位 ( 2023-2024) | WOS Quartile: Q1
| ||||||||||||||||
索引 (SCI or SCIE) | Science Citation Index Expanded | ||||||||||||||||
鏈接到PubMed Central (PMC) | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=1869-4101%5BISSN%5D | ||||||||||||||||
平均審稿時間 * | 來自出版商的數據: 來自作者的數據: 13 Weeks | ||||||||||||||||
競爭力 * | 來自作者的數據: | ||||||||||||||||
參考鏈接 |
| ||||||||||||||||
*所有的審稿過程指標,如接受率和審稿速度,僅限於用戶提交的稿件。因此,這些指標可能無法準確反映期刊的競爭力或速度。 |
|
|
首頁 上一頁 1 下一頁 末頁 (頁 | |
[Insights into Imaging] 的評論 | 撰寫評論 |
作者: FMingmingming 領域: 医学 審稿時間: 6.0 month(s) 結果: 拒稿 撰寫評論 |
2024-12-26 18:20:00 評論於 The magazine does like radiomics, but encountered a very disgusting Chinese deputy editor. Those who are interested can look it up for themselves. Think twice before submitting a manuscript as a Chinese and pray not to encounter the only Chinese deputy editor. After six months of external review, we thought that even if the manuscript was not accepted, we would receive good feedback. The reviewers' comments were: Reviewer 1: 1) Insufficient data, 2) Inconsistent MRI scan protocol, 3) We used a specific AI software. They suggested that we make substantial revisions. Reviewer 2: Very interesting, bringing radiomics into clinical research. 1) Language issues, 2) Suggested adding a summary paragraph. That's it! In the end, the deputy editor rejected it, which is ridiculous. ![]() ![]() |
作者: 罗朝天 領域: 医学 審稿時間: 1.0 month(s) 結果: 拒稿 撰寫評論 |
2024-11-03 11:26:40 評論於 Conventional clinical research is not easy to accept, preferring omics and bioinformatics. ![]() ![]() |
首頁 上一頁 1 下一頁 末頁 (頁 |
Contact us