How is it going?

(0) 讚！ | popor

20240611 submit to journal
First time submitting, hoping for good news

(0) 讚！ | 张海涛

May I ask which editor I am speaking to?

(0) 讚！ | popor

The editor is Dr. Rodrigo Salvador, but the one I submitted to was not him, it should have been assigned by the editor-in-chief. 
It's a bit exaggerated to take four months for the first review, the review process of this journal shouldn't be that long, right? Could it be that the initial reviewers rejected it, and the editor had to find new reviewers, causing the delay?

(0) 讚！ | 棋石

Which editor rejected it? I was rejected a few months ago, and one reviewer rejected it all

(0) 讚！ | popor

I would like to express my gratitude to the teacher for their hard work guidance, as well as their high tolerance and support towards my anxious mindset during the submission and revision period

(0) 讚！ | 棋石

2024.02.20 Submitted to Journal
2024.02.21 With Editor
2024.02.23 Under Review
It may be because we contacted the previous reviewers, so the process was quick; I can't remember the previous submission clearly, but it definitely didn't take more than a week

(0) 讚！ | 棋石

Congratulations! May I ask how long after we will submit the application, sir?

(0) 讚！ | 张七曜

2024.02.20 Submitted to Journal
2024.03.28 Major revision
2024.04.24 Minor Revision
2024.05.09 Minor Revision
2024.05.19 Accept
I majored in mechanical processes, but my paper leans towards industrial engineering.
I was just accepted, feeling excited, and came to share. It would be an honor if it could be helpful.
The submission experience was a bit bumpy. I submitted last year, received very negative feedback from three reviewers, and was rejected. However, after modifications, I was allowed to resubmit. (For friends who have had a similar experience, you can choose to provide explanations to the editors and submit a Marked-up and Clean manuscript with corresponding responses. Of course, if the review comments are particularly negative, please ignore them).
The modifications were quite thorough; two of the three reviewers responded with suggestions for acceptance without any other comments, but still gave a major revision. I made several adjustments along the way, including two minor revisions that were quite nerve-wracking.
Two personal observations:
1. The journal is extremely efficient, processing submissions almost immediately, with a fast review period.
2. The Editor was extremely responsible, guiding me step by step to complete the final draft. Thank you, Editor.
I hope all my friends can also achieve their wishes (feeling excited, going to calm down

(1) 讚！ | 棋石

2024.04.27 Out of scope, reject

(0) 讚！ | DeweyDU

Sure, you can find it on the MSI official account, or check the backstage code on the webpage by pressing Fn+F12

(0) 讚！ | 赵补拙

It has been almost two weeks since the decision was made by the editor and it changed to "with Editor". What does this mean?

(0) 讚！ | 希望早日accept

Hello, I would like to ask if I can track which reviewers are assigned to review my submission during external audit

(0) 讚！ | GH.S

04.25 submitted
04.25 with editor

(0) 讚！ | DeweyDU

Apr 24, 2024 Submitted to Journal
Apr 24, 2024 Reject
God-level speed, scored 6, tastes worse than the bitterness of love, 555!
------Wish you all a smooth submission process and early acceptance!

(0) 讚！ | Zero2021

Submission on 4th March, 2024.
The review of comments on 30th March was too quick

(0) 讚！ | 早日正刊

I am also in a similar situation, how should I proceed?

(0) 讚！ | lucky xian

Dreamy Romance

(0) 讚！ | DUDU

Additional, on February 13, 2024, three reviewers were invited for external review, with two accepting the review. Thank you to the editors for taking the time to review and submit the article during the Spring Festival

(1) 讚！ | 赵补拙

2024.2.6 Submission
2024.3.17 First round of comments returned, major revisions, two reviewers gave relatively positive feedback, minor issues to address, editor pointed out some formatting and detail issues, emphasized the importance of innovation, one month given for revisions.
2024.3.25 Resubmitted after revisions, actually finished early but hesitated to submit too soon, editor felt revisions were not made carefully.
2024.3.30 Second round of comments returned, minor revisions. Editor did not invite reviewers, likely because he reviewed and found no issues to invite reviewers for, primarily formatting and standardization of units.
2024.3.31 Resubmitted after second round of revisions.
2024.4.2 Accepted.
Thank you for the recognition from the editor and reviewers! Wishing the journal continued success, and best wishes to all teachers

(0) 讚！ | 赵补拙

Carbon emissions direction, record this double 1 area journal. Before, I won a clean production award, and I originally wanted to submit it to the comprehensive environmental journal. However, after checking the publication volume, it is estimated that it has increased from over 8,000 to 11,000 this year. I finally chose this one, hoping to receive a major revision through blind review.

2024.3.24 submission
2024.3.25 with editor
2024.3.26 rejected

(0) 讚！ | dengzi13

Has your article been accepted? After I submitted it, there was no confirmation of acceptance, just a document number generated when creating the PDF

(0) 讚！ | Echo-X

Have you received yours already? How long did it take to send it for review? Could you share the timeline?

(0) 讚！ | CC小博

Can I ask everyone: After submitting my manuscript, I did not receive a manuscript number. Does this journal not issue manuscript numbers, or when should I expect to receive one?

(0) 讚！ | CC小博

Hello teacher, may I ask about your availability?

(0) 讚！ | 星铁，启动！