It has been over 70 days since my second review, and I have also sent a follow-up letter, but there has been no response

(0) 讚！ | 静酱

The article was transferred from NC to a new publication, and the reviewers raised forty or fifty minor issues during the peer review process, which was quite rigorous

(0) 讚！ | Galxy

Initially submitted to the top journal Nature's sub-journal, it was rejected layer by layer and eventually gave up to submit to CB.
At first, I looked down on CB, thinking it was some kind of rubbish sub-journal, but I didn't expect the review process to be very strict and almost in line with the standards of the sub-journal.
I had to revise it three times in total, with over 50 review comments (not including multiple small issues under each comment), which was very troublesome.
Finally, in terms of formatting, I had to check and modify a 20-page table one by one to ensure that all requirements met the journal standards.
Overall, this submission experience made me feel that CB's review process is indeed strict and well-deserved of being in Tier 1, not as easy as others have described

(3) 讚！ | Zizi

After more than two months of waiting, I couldn't wait any longer and sent a reminder email. The reply I received said that one reviewer had dropped out and another was still delaying. Currently, I have only received feedback from one reviewer. This is frustrating. How much longer do I have to wait? I hope the minor revisions can be smoothly accepted! I really need to graduate soon!!!

(0) 讚！ | 三五七

The quality of journal papers has been steadily improving, and we hope to manage this magazine well

(2) 讚！ | ............,,,,,

Isn't this journal all about money?

(0) 讚！ | Luft

Could you please provide me with the review time? How long does the first review take?

(0) 讚！ | Gz199

It's been over a month since my second appeal and I haven't heard anything

(0) 讚！ | saiharaneko

Under review for two months, still no news, what should I do, waiting to graduate

(0) 讚！ | 三五七

How is the progress now? It's been almost two months and still no news

(0) 讚！ | 三五七

The follow-up development came, and when it had been under review for 103 days, I wrote a follow-up letter. Three days later, the editor in charge of my manuscript said they were still looking for a third reviewer and asked me to recommend one. That night, I wrote a withdrawal letter to the chief editor. What a waste of over three months by that magazine

(0) 讚！ | Laichengteng

The review speed is too slow, I'm getting impatient

(0) 讚！ | 寺后赵

editor assigned It's been 15 days already, how long will this state last

(0) 讚！ | 毛衣

CDD was transferred, transferred on January 18, processed by the editor 12 days later, submitted for review 7 days later, and then there was no progress. There has been no news from the external review for 86 days. I sent a reminder email saying they are still waiting for a reviewer's response. I am truly puzzled

(0) 讚！ | Laichengteng

Is the magazine on vacation all through March? How long does it usually take for a submission to go back to the first review stage? I have been under review for almost two months now, is this a normal speed for the magazine? Should I follow up?

(0) 讚！ | kristina9911

Hello, may I ask if there is a template for this journal? I have been looking for a template for a long time, but have not found it. Thank you

(0) 讚！ | May8535

Is there any indication in the submission system that the submitted files will be sent to the reviewers in a compressed form? Thank you very much

(0) 讚！ | 会毕业的！

Has it shown "Under Review" on your side?

(0) 讚！ | 会毕业的！

Why does the submission system keep crashing and I can't submit my work? Am I the only one experiencing this?

(0) 讚！ | xishuai Wang

Editor Review Started	15th Jan 24
Initial Manuscript Review Started	5th Jan 24
Editor Assigned	4th Jan 24
Submission	4th Jan 24
Manuscript Transferred	4th Jan 24
Hello, my status has been like this, I don't know if it has been submitted for review

(0) 讚！ | wangmeili

How are you progressing? My status is still at Editor Review Started

(0) 讚！ | wangmeili

Only publishing hot topics will naturally lead to high citation rates, and any classification based solely on citations is rubbish. Journals with good reputations publish both popular and niche topics, so citations are naturally uneven. The Nature series only publishes hot topics – enough is enough, ZKY

(8) 讚！ | 首龚

The new division of the Chinese Academy of Sciences not only considers Impact Factor, but also looks at the distribution of citations. If the citations are relatively evenly distributed, rather than relying on a few reviews or data and tool articles like some journals, the division will be positioned at the forefront

(0) 讚！ | Bio平平

Communications biology, Communications earth & environment, and Communications physics were all classified as first-class journals by the Chinese Academy of Sciences in 2023. The development trend of the Communications series of journals is good

(210) 讚！ | PRLKING

Communications Biology has unexpectedly become the top 1 zone of the Chinese Academy of Sciences. This is unbelievable. Is this the work of those who are in charge of the zoning trying to boost their own journal?

(165) 讚！ | bolysu