Please translate the following passage into English and Japanese, with titles ":" and ":"

(0) 讚！ | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

The discussion section is the core part of an SCI paper, as it can demonstrate the breadth and depth of the author's research. Therefore, there is no specific word limit for this section. Depending on the article and the author, the length of the discussion section can vary, ranging from a few thousand words to tens of thousands of words

(0) 讚！ | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

How many words are usually recommended for a discussion?

(0) 讚！ | 上清雨真

Can experiments that were intended but not carried out be included in the discussion?

(0) 讚！ | 深渊兴业

Very very difficult journal, the boss said let me shock, then I willHad to try it..

(0) 讚！ | Gaynell

A very difficult journal, the boss told me to give it a try, so I had to give it a shot

(0) 讚！ | 通背光磊

It is still over 5 points, although there is no big change, it can be considered stable, also as upper middle level

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

@chenhu1987, I saw your article, and it contains a lot of data

(0) 讚！ | 昭巫怀梦

Review speed: 1.0 | Submission hit rate: 25.0 Experience Sharing: Recently received a paper, the journal's requirements were high, the review was very careful, and the review speed was fast. 16-3-24 First submission 16-3-25 with editor 16-4-4 reject, the editor said the materials and methods were repetitive with previous articles and asked for revisions before resubmission 16-4-18 resubmission 16-4-19 with editor 16-4-21 under review 16-5-11 returned with modification suggestions, given 60 days for revisions 16-7-7 revised 16-7-8 with editor 16-7-10 under review 16-7-18 required reviews completed 16-7-20 accept 16-7-21 online

(0) 讚！ | 百花凝丝

Review speed: 2.0 | Submission hit rate: 5.0
Experience sharing: The level of this journal is getting higher and higher, and they reject without sending to external review

(0) 讚！ | 宛瑶小仙女

Just received a manuscript, the review period is about one month, the speed is still acceptable. The review process is quite strict, if not major revisions are made in the first submission, it will be rejected. So, I conducted an additional four months of experiments, added a small experiment in the second revision, and finally got accepted after a minor revision in the third submission. One of the reviewers kept mentioning language issues. The whole process took more than 9 months, but the article was finally accepted

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

The speed is alright, you should expect results in around 20 to 30 days

(0) 讚！ | 北风远香

Submitted on June 26th, under review 4 days later, the status has not changed yet. Unsure of how fast the journal is

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

Review speed: 2.0 Experience sharing: The speed of this journal's IF increase is really good. Just received one submission at the end of October, accepted in early December, with minor revisions in between, and changed a figure as well. It should be said that the review process is very rigorous. The initial review was sent to two experts, one said it was very good, while the other raised a lot of criticisms. The editor thought it was good, but still cautiously sent it to a third reviewer, who gave suggestions for minor revisions before confirming acceptance. In the end, only the figure was changed, and some questions were answered. The review speed was about three weeks, which is considered good for a journal

(0) 讚！ | 无击明朗

Bullish, if it goes up again tomorrow, it may break the 3 points mark

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

Just received a paper that was submitted on August 1st. It took two months for the initial review. One reviewer had very simple questions, while the other reviewer asked very professional and thorough questions. We had to conduct an additional 3 months of experiments as requested. Two weeks after submission, we received an acceptance letter. It's not a bad thing to have higher standards - it ensures the quality of the journal

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁